法律分析:库存吸入器政策和责任:事实还是虚构?

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 LAW
Jessica Wrona, Alan Schwartz, Paige Hardy, Amy Campbell, Andrea A Pappalardo
{"title":"法律分析:库存吸入器政策和责任:事实还是虚构?","authors":"Jessica Wrona, Alan Schwartz, Paige Hardy, Amy Campbell, Andrea A Pappalardo","doi":"10.1080/01947648.2025.2524669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Asthma is the most common chronic lung disease in children and disproportionately impacts children from marginalized populations. Pediatric asthma health disparities are persistent, and multi-level solutions are needed to achieve health equity. Health policy, when equitably and successfully implemented, has the capacity to address these disparities and improve health outcomes. A stock inhaler policy is a simple policy solution to the lack of rescue inhaler access in the school setting, with a necessity for deescalating asthma symptoms, which are common. Despite this being a commonsense policy, implementation of stock inhaler programming after passage of Public Act 100-0726 in 2018 has been slow. One reason for this has been the reluctance of prescribers and school administrations due to liability concerns. Two recent studies corroborated that this was a heightened concern. To assess the legitimacy of potential liability concerns raised, a legal analysis of Public Act 100-0726 was conducted. This article details our collaborative legal analysis conducted with key partners in public health, medical, and legal fields. The results of the legal analysis suggest that risk of liability is low and concerns are overestimated. Therefore, efforts to mitigate perceptions of liability and to link schools to universal prescribers may facilitate stock inhaler policies in Illinois and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":44014,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Analysis: Stock Inhaler Policy and Liability: Fact or Fiction?\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Wrona, Alan Schwartz, Paige Hardy, Amy Campbell, Andrea A Pappalardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01947648.2025.2524669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Asthma is the most common chronic lung disease in children and disproportionately impacts children from marginalized populations. Pediatric asthma health disparities are persistent, and multi-level solutions are needed to achieve health equity. Health policy, when equitably and successfully implemented, has the capacity to address these disparities and improve health outcomes. A stock inhaler policy is a simple policy solution to the lack of rescue inhaler access in the school setting, with a necessity for deescalating asthma symptoms, which are common. Despite this being a commonsense policy, implementation of stock inhaler programming after passage of Public Act 100-0726 in 2018 has been slow. One reason for this has been the reluctance of prescribers and school administrations due to liability concerns. Two recent studies corroborated that this was a heightened concern. To assess the legitimacy of potential liability concerns raised, a legal analysis of Public Act 100-0726 was conducted. This article details our collaborative legal analysis conducted with key partners in public health, medical, and legal fields. The results of the legal analysis suggest that risk of liability is low and concerns are overestimated. Therefore, efforts to mitigate perceptions of liability and to link schools to universal prescribers may facilitate stock inhaler policies in Illinois and beyond.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2025.2524669\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01947648.2025.2524669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

哮喘是儿童中最常见的慢性肺部疾病,对边缘人群儿童的影响尤为严重。儿童哮喘健康差距持续存在,需要多层次的解决方案来实现卫生公平。卫生政策如果得到公平和成功的执行,就有能力解决这些差距并改善健康结果。库存吸入器政策是解决学校环境中缺乏救援吸入器的简单政策解决方案,有必要减轻常见的哮喘症状。尽管这是一项常识性政策,但在2018年通过第100-0726号公共法案后,库存吸入器规划的实施进展缓慢。其中一个原因是处方医生和学校管理部门出于责任方面的考虑而不愿使用这种药物。最近的两项研究证实,这是一个高度关注的问题。为了评估所提出的潜在责任问题的合法性,对Public Act 100-0726进行了法律分析。本文详细介绍了我们与公共卫生、医疗和法律领域的主要合作伙伴进行的合作法律分析。法律分析的结果表明,责任风险较低,担忧被高估。因此,努力减轻责任观念,并将学校与普遍处方者联系起来,可能会促进伊利诺伊州和其他地区的库存吸入器政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Analysis: Stock Inhaler Policy and Liability: Fact or Fiction?

Asthma is the most common chronic lung disease in children and disproportionately impacts children from marginalized populations. Pediatric asthma health disparities are persistent, and multi-level solutions are needed to achieve health equity. Health policy, when equitably and successfully implemented, has the capacity to address these disparities and improve health outcomes. A stock inhaler policy is a simple policy solution to the lack of rescue inhaler access in the school setting, with a necessity for deescalating asthma symptoms, which are common. Despite this being a commonsense policy, implementation of stock inhaler programming after passage of Public Act 100-0726 in 2018 has been slow. One reason for this has been the reluctance of prescribers and school administrations due to liability concerns. Two recent studies corroborated that this was a heightened concern. To assess the legitimacy of potential liability concerns raised, a legal analysis of Public Act 100-0726 was conducted. This article details our collaborative legal analysis conducted with key partners in public health, medical, and legal fields. The results of the legal analysis suggest that risk of liability is low and concerns are overestimated. Therefore, efforts to mitigate perceptions of liability and to link schools to universal prescribers may facilitate stock inhaler policies in Illinois and beyond.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: The Journal of Legal Medicine is the official quarterly publication of the American College of Legal Medicine (ACLM). Incorporated in 1960, the ACLM has among its objectives the fostering and encouragement of research and study in the field of legal medicine. The Journal of Legal Medicine is internationally circulated and includes articles and commentaries on topics of interest in legal medicine, health law and policy, professional liability, hospital law, food and drug law, medical legal research and education, the history of legal medicine, and a broad range of other related topics. Book review essays, featuring leading contributions to the field, are included in each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信