Yanpeng Shen, Kanto Nishikawa, Shimpei F Hiruta, Satoshi Shimano, Tom Goldschmidt, Jianping Jiang, Anthony Lau, Daosavanh Sanamxay, Nguyen Thien Tao
{"title":"东亚和东南亚寄主蝾螈(尾目:蝾螈科)和寄生螨(蜱螨目:水蛭科)的系统发育比较研究。","authors":"Yanpeng Shen, Kanto Nishikawa, Shimpei F Hiruta, Satoshi Shimano, Tom Goldschmidt, Jianping Jiang, Anthony Lau, Daosavanh Sanamxay, Nguyen Thien Tao","doi":"10.2108/zs240074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The water mite genus <i>Hygrobates</i> and the newt family Salamandridae are distributed widely in the northern hemisphere. However, only in Eastern and Southeastern Asia a host-parasite association developed, with several <i>Hygrobates</i> species, which belong to the subgenus <i>Lurchibates</i>, parasitizing newts of the genera <i>Laotriton</i>, <i>Pachytriton</i>, and <i>Paramesotriton</i>. Presently, there is no molecular study on parasitic <i>Hygrobates</i>, which impedes our understanding of their phylogeny and the evolutionary history of the host-parasite association between <i>Lurchibates</i> and their hosts. In this study, we performed comparative phylogenetic analyses on parasitic <i>Lurchibates</i> mites and their newt hosts based on their respective phylogenies. Our results did not support the monophyly of parasitic species of <i>Hygrobates</i>, but instead, group them significantly with a free-living species, <i>H. longiporus</i>. Among the parasitic species, <i>H. forcipifer</i>, <i>H. macrochela</i>, <i>H. malosimilis</i>, and <i>H. robustipalpis</i> are significantly grouped together, while branching patterns of the remaining species were not supported. Distance-based approaches of cophylogeny analysis between hosts and parasites found no significant link. On the other hand, among all the cost schemes constructed by event-based cophylogeny methods, four cospeciation events, two duplication and host-switching events, one loss event, and two failure to diverge events between parasitic water mites and newts were discovered. Our findings suggested that host switching events might have played an important role in the evolution of these parasitic mites, which might have led to incompletely exclusive host-parasitic relationships at species level.</p>","PeriodicalId":24040,"journal":{"name":"Zoological Science","volume":"42 3","pages":"279-286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Phylogenetic Study on Host Newts (Caudata: Salamandridae) and Parasitic Mites (Acariformes: Hydrachnidia: Hygrobatidae) in East and Southeast Asia.\",\"authors\":\"Yanpeng Shen, Kanto Nishikawa, Shimpei F Hiruta, Satoshi Shimano, Tom Goldschmidt, Jianping Jiang, Anthony Lau, Daosavanh Sanamxay, Nguyen Thien Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.2108/zs240074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The water mite genus <i>Hygrobates</i> and the newt family Salamandridae are distributed widely in the northern hemisphere. However, only in Eastern and Southeastern Asia a host-parasite association developed, with several <i>Hygrobates</i> species, which belong to the subgenus <i>Lurchibates</i>, parasitizing newts of the genera <i>Laotriton</i>, <i>Pachytriton</i>, and <i>Paramesotriton</i>. Presently, there is no molecular study on parasitic <i>Hygrobates</i>, which impedes our understanding of their phylogeny and the evolutionary history of the host-parasite association between <i>Lurchibates</i> and their hosts. In this study, we performed comparative phylogenetic analyses on parasitic <i>Lurchibates</i> mites and their newt hosts based on their respective phylogenies. Our results did not support the monophyly of parasitic species of <i>Hygrobates</i>, but instead, group them significantly with a free-living species, <i>H. longiporus</i>. Among the parasitic species, <i>H. forcipifer</i>, <i>H. macrochela</i>, <i>H. malosimilis</i>, and <i>H. robustipalpis</i> are significantly grouped together, while branching patterns of the remaining species were not supported. Distance-based approaches of cophylogeny analysis between hosts and parasites found no significant link. On the other hand, among all the cost schemes constructed by event-based cophylogeny methods, four cospeciation events, two duplication and host-switching events, one loss event, and two failure to diverge events between parasitic water mites and newts were discovered. Our findings suggested that host switching events might have played an important role in the evolution of these parasitic mites, which might have led to incompletely exclusive host-parasitic relationships at species level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoological Science\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"279-286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2108/zs240074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoological Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2108/zs240074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Phylogenetic Study on Host Newts (Caudata: Salamandridae) and Parasitic Mites (Acariformes: Hydrachnidia: Hygrobatidae) in East and Southeast Asia.
The water mite genus Hygrobates and the newt family Salamandridae are distributed widely in the northern hemisphere. However, only in Eastern and Southeastern Asia a host-parasite association developed, with several Hygrobates species, which belong to the subgenus Lurchibates, parasitizing newts of the genera Laotriton, Pachytriton, and Paramesotriton. Presently, there is no molecular study on parasitic Hygrobates, which impedes our understanding of their phylogeny and the evolutionary history of the host-parasite association between Lurchibates and their hosts. In this study, we performed comparative phylogenetic analyses on parasitic Lurchibates mites and their newt hosts based on their respective phylogenies. Our results did not support the monophyly of parasitic species of Hygrobates, but instead, group them significantly with a free-living species, H. longiporus. Among the parasitic species, H. forcipifer, H. macrochela, H. malosimilis, and H. robustipalpis are significantly grouped together, while branching patterns of the remaining species were not supported. Distance-based approaches of cophylogeny analysis between hosts and parasites found no significant link. On the other hand, among all the cost schemes constructed by event-based cophylogeny methods, four cospeciation events, two duplication and host-switching events, one loss event, and two failure to diverge events between parasitic water mites and newts were discovered. Our findings suggested that host switching events might have played an important role in the evolution of these parasitic mites, which might have led to incompletely exclusive host-parasitic relationships at species level.
期刊介绍:
Zoological Science is published by the Zoological Society of Japan and devoted to publication of original articles, reviews and editorials that cover the broad field of zoology. The journal was founded in 1984 as a result of the consolidation of Zoological Magazine (1888–1983) and Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses (1897–1983), the former official journals of the Zoological Society of Japan. Each annual volume consists of six regular issues, one every two months.