儿童胃空肠造口管置换的频率和结果-单中心经验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s00247-025-06310-6
Swetha S Yatham, Lara Herbert, Angela Rogers
{"title":"儿童胃空肠造口管置换的频率和结果-单中心经验。","authors":"Swetha S Yatham, Lara Herbert, Angela Rogers","doi":"10.1007/s00247-025-06310-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At present, there is no consensus on whether gastrojejunostomy tubes should be routinely changed and if so, on what timescale.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe our 5-year experience following the 2018 introduction of an interventional radiology lead service of four to six monthly elective changes. We focused on the impact this had on the number and length of hospital admissions, and radiation dose.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective review of gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges performed from 2011-2022 in a single centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 11 years, 89 gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges were performed in ten patients. Following the introduction of the interventional radiology-led elective service in 2018, 50 gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges were done electively vs 25 done as emergencies. On average, gastrojejunostomy tubes were replaced every 5.6 months (elective 6.4 months, emergency 3.3 months). The median was 4 months. The most cited reasons for an emergency replacement were a malfunctioning tube or displaced tube. General anaesthetic was required for 61 exchanges. Admission time was shorter for elective exchanges (1.2 days vs 3.1 days). There was no significant difference in the average dose area product for elective vs emergency procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that an optimal time for gastrojejunostomy tube replacement is 4 months. Elective replacement of gastrojejunostomy tubes results in a reduced number and length of admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1838-1845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and outcomes of gastrojejunostomy tube replacement in children - a single-centre experience.\",\"authors\":\"Swetha S Yatham, Lara Herbert, Angela Rogers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00247-025-06310-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At present, there is no consensus on whether gastrojejunostomy tubes should be routinely changed and if so, on what timescale.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe our 5-year experience following the 2018 introduction of an interventional radiology lead service of four to six monthly elective changes. We focused on the impact this had on the number and length of hospital admissions, and radiation dose.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective review of gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges performed from 2011-2022 in a single centre.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 11 years, 89 gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges were performed in ten patients. Following the introduction of the interventional radiology-led elective service in 2018, 50 gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges were done electively vs 25 done as emergencies. On average, gastrojejunostomy tubes were replaced every 5.6 months (elective 6.4 months, emergency 3.3 months). The median was 4 months. The most cited reasons for an emergency replacement were a malfunctioning tube or displaced tube. General anaesthetic was required for 61 exchanges. Admission time was shorter for elective exchanges (1.2 days vs 3.1 days). There was no significant difference in the average dose area product for elective vs emergency procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that an optimal time for gastrojejunostomy tube replacement is 4 months. Elective replacement of gastrojejunostomy tubes results in a reduced number and length of admissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1838-1845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06310-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-025-06310-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,关于胃空肠造口管是否应该常规更换,如果需要,在什么时间尺度上没有共识。目的:我们描述了我们在2018年引入介入放射学先导服务后的5年经验,该服务每月进行4至6次选择性改变。我们关注的是这对住院次数和时间长短以及辐射剂量的影响。材料和方法:回顾性分析2011-2022年在单一中心进行的胃空肠造口管交换。结果:11年来,10例患者共行胃空肠造口管置换89例。自2018年引入介入放射学主导的选择性服务以来,50例胃空肠造口管置换是选择性的,25例是急诊。平均每5.6个月更换一次胃空肠造口管(择期6.4个月,急诊3.3个月)。中位数为4个月。紧急更换的最常见原因是管道故障或管道移位。61例交换手术需要全身麻醉。选修交换生的入院时间较短(1.2天比3.1天)。选择性手术与紧急手术的平均剂量面积乘积没有显著差异。结论:胃空肠造口管更换的最佳时间为4个月。选择性更换胃空肠造口管可减少住院次数和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency and outcomes of gastrojejunostomy tube replacement in children - a single-centre experience.

Background: At present, there is no consensus on whether gastrojejunostomy tubes should be routinely changed and if so, on what timescale.

Objective: We describe our 5-year experience following the 2018 introduction of an interventional radiology lead service of four to six monthly elective changes. We focused on the impact this had on the number and length of hospital admissions, and radiation dose.

Materials and methods: Retrospective review of gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges performed from 2011-2022 in a single centre.

Results: Over 11 years, 89 gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges were performed in ten patients. Following the introduction of the interventional radiology-led elective service in 2018, 50 gastrojejunostomy tube exchanges were done electively vs 25 done as emergencies. On average, gastrojejunostomy tubes were replaced every 5.6 months (elective 6.4 months, emergency 3.3 months). The median was 4 months. The most cited reasons for an emergency replacement were a malfunctioning tube or displaced tube. General anaesthetic was required for 61 exchanges. Admission time was shorter for elective exchanges (1.2 days vs 3.1 days). There was no significant difference in the average dose area product for elective vs emergency procedures.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that an optimal time for gastrojejunostomy tube replacement is 4 months. Elective replacement of gastrojejunostomy tubes results in a reduced number and length of admissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信