Landon P Frazier, Christopher M Brusalis, Katie J McMorrow, Ryan Quigley, Joshua T Kaiser, Zachary D Meeker, Allen A Yazdi, Alexander C Weissman, Krish S Sardesai, Brian J Cole
{"title":"一种新型皮肤闭合装置加速骨科手术切口的早期美容:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Landon P Frazier, Christopher M Brusalis, Katie J McMorrow, Ryan Quigley, Joshua T Kaiser, Zachary D Meeker, Allen A Yazdi, Alexander C Weissman, Krish S Sardesai, Brian J Cole","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2023.0228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cosmesis of surgical incisions can greatly impact postoperative patient satisfaction. This study aimed to compare the rate and overall cosmetic improvement of orthopaedic surgical incisions between conventional suture closure and a novel skin closure device.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this single-blind, randomised, prospective controlled trial, a consecutive series of patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine procedures of the knee, shoulder and elbow were randomised to undergo wound closure via either conventional suture or a micro-anchor skin closure device (BandGrip; BandGrip, US). Wounds were stratified by incision length (small ≤2cm and large >2cm). Wound cosmesis was evaluated by two blinded observers' ratings according to the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES) at two weeks, two months and one year postoperatively. For both small and large incisions, mean HWES was compared between groups at each timepoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 incisions were evaluated from 83 patients, including 111 incisions ≤2cm and 38 incisions >2cm. Among incisions ≤2cm, HWES ratings were significantly improved at two weeks and two months postoperatively for incisions closed with a micro-anchor skin closure device, whereas no significant differences between treatment groups were detected at one year postoperatively. Among incisions measuring >2cm (mean incision length = 7.74cm), mean HWES ratings were improved using the micro-anchor adhesive device at two months postoperatively, while HWES ratings were comparable at one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel micro-anchor skin closure device achieves comparable cosmetic outcomes to conventional suture and may reach satisfactory cosmesis more rapidly following orthopaedic sports medicine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 Sup7","pages":"S23-S28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel skin closure device accelerates early cosmesis in orthopaedic surgical incisions: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Landon P Frazier, Christopher M Brusalis, Katie J McMorrow, Ryan Quigley, Joshua T Kaiser, Zachary D Meeker, Allen A Yazdi, Alexander C Weissman, Krish S Sardesai, Brian J Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2023.0228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cosmesis of surgical incisions can greatly impact postoperative patient satisfaction. This study aimed to compare the rate and overall cosmetic improvement of orthopaedic surgical incisions between conventional suture closure and a novel skin closure device.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this single-blind, randomised, prospective controlled trial, a consecutive series of patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine procedures of the knee, shoulder and elbow were randomised to undergo wound closure via either conventional suture or a micro-anchor skin closure device (BandGrip; BandGrip, US). Wounds were stratified by incision length (small ≤2cm and large >2cm). Wound cosmesis was evaluated by two blinded observers' ratings according to the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES) at two weeks, two months and one year postoperatively. For both small and large incisions, mean HWES was compared between groups at each timepoint.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 incisions were evaluated from 83 patients, including 111 incisions ≤2cm and 38 incisions >2cm. Among incisions ≤2cm, HWES ratings were significantly improved at two weeks and two months postoperatively for incisions closed with a micro-anchor skin closure device, whereas no significant differences between treatment groups were detected at one year postoperatively. Among incisions measuring >2cm (mean incision length = 7.74cm), mean HWES ratings were improved using the micro-anchor adhesive device at two months postoperatively, while HWES ratings were comparable at one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A novel micro-anchor skin closure device achieves comparable cosmetic outcomes to conventional suture and may reach satisfactory cosmesis more rapidly following orthopaedic sports medicine surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 Sup7\",\"pages\":\"S23-S28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.0228\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.0228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A novel skin closure device accelerates early cosmesis in orthopaedic surgical incisions: a randomised controlled trial.
Objective: Cosmesis of surgical incisions can greatly impact postoperative patient satisfaction. This study aimed to compare the rate and overall cosmetic improvement of orthopaedic surgical incisions between conventional suture closure and a novel skin closure device.
Method: In this single-blind, randomised, prospective controlled trial, a consecutive series of patients undergoing orthopaedic sports medicine procedures of the knee, shoulder and elbow were randomised to undergo wound closure via either conventional suture or a micro-anchor skin closure device (BandGrip; BandGrip, US). Wounds were stratified by incision length (small ≤2cm and large >2cm). Wound cosmesis was evaluated by two blinded observers' ratings according to the Hollander Wound Evaluation Scale (HWES) at two weeks, two months and one year postoperatively. For both small and large incisions, mean HWES was compared between groups at each timepoint.
Results: A total of 149 incisions were evaluated from 83 patients, including 111 incisions ≤2cm and 38 incisions >2cm. Among incisions ≤2cm, HWES ratings were significantly improved at two weeks and two months postoperatively for incisions closed with a micro-anchor skin closure device, whereas no significant differences between treatment groups were detected at one year postoperatively. Among incisions measuring >2cm (mean incision length = 7.74cm), mean HWES ratings were improved using the micro-anchor adhesive device at two months postoperatively, while HWES ratings were comparable at one year postoperatively.
Conclusion: A novel micro-anchor skin closure device achieves comparable cosmetic outcomes to conventional suture and may reach satisfactory cosmesis more rapidly following orthopaedic sports medicine surgery.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice.
In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers.
Specifically, JWC publishes:
High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more
The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide
In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments
Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds
Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness
Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.