Kavita Patil , Manita Adhikari , Peter Rubinelli , Jennifer C. Acuff
{"title":"一种肠道沙门氏菌替代物,用于脱脂奶粉和低水分食品环境的未来验证研究。","authors":"Kavita Patil , Manita Adhikari , Peter Rubinelli , Jennifer C. Acuff","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low-moisture food persistent bacterial populations (LMF PBPs) may be responsible for pathogen harborage in LMF processing environments, resulting in outbreaks and recalls. To address this issue, industry requires a surrogate to understand the survivability of LMF PBP and perform in-plant validation studies to reduce the level of this pathogen to an acceptable level. Hygienic controls for the LMF industry must be tailored to different equipment, environments, and food types. In-plant validations with a surrogate would assist with evaluating the efficacy of sanitation protocols that eliminate LMF PBPs and harborage. This study explored surrogates for <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBP to provide tools for challenge studies to eliminate LMF PBPs from stainless-steel surfaces. Three surrogates (<em>Escherichia coli</em> MP 26, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, <em>Pediococcus acidilactici</em>) were evaluated for similarity to a <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBP in nonfat dried milk (NFDM) formed on stainless steel coupons stored at 30% or 70% relative humidity (RH) at 25 °C. Coupons were prepared with a previously established method to form an LMF PBP (0.5 g of NFDM, 0.4 mL culture). Microbial survival was enumerated at intervals (0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days) using standard plating techniques. An ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to compare log reductions to identify suitable surrogates. <em>E. faecium</em> exhibited higher survival trends that were most similar to <em>Salmonella</em>, with no significant differences in log reductions (<em>p</em> > 0.05). In contrast, <em>E. coli</em> surrogate panel and <em>P. acidilactici</em> showed significantly greater reductions, making them unsuitable surrogate candidates for <em>Salmonella</em>. Matrices and RH interactions influenced survival, but <em>E. faecium</em> consistently mirrored <em>Salmonella</em> behavior. <em>E. faecium</em> was similar but hardier than <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBPs and could be used in processing environments for challenging and validating sanitation protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 9","pages":"Article 100578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Salmonella enterica Surrogate for Future Validation Studies for Nonfat Dried Milk and Low-Moisture Food Environments\",\"authors\":\"Kavita Patil , Manita Adhikari , Peter Rubinelli , Jennifer C. Acuff\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Low-moisture food persistent bacterial populations (LMF PBPs) may be responsible for pathogen harborage in LMF processing environments, resulting in outbreaks and recalls. To address this issue, industry requires a surrogate to understand the survivability of LMF PBP and perform in-plant validation studies to reduce the level of this pathogen to an acceptable level. Hygienic controls for the LMF industry must be tailored to different equipment, environments, and food types. In-plant validations with a surrogate would assist with evaluating the efficacy of sanitation protocols that eliminate LMF PBPs and harborage. This study explored surrogates for <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBP to provide tools for challenge studies to eliminate LMF PBPs from stainless-steel surfaces. Three surrogates (<em>Escherichia coli</em> MP 26, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em>, <em>Pediococcus acidilactici</em>) were evaluated for similarity to a <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBP in nonfat dried milk (NFDM) formed on stainless steel coupons stored at 30% or 70% relative humidity (RH) at 25 °C. Coupons were prepared with a previously established method to form an LMF PBP (0.5 g of NFDM, 0.4 mL culture). Microbial survival was enumerated at intervals (0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days) using standard plating techniques. An ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to compare log reductions to identify suitable surrogates. <em>E. faecium</em> exhibited higher survival trends that were most similar to <em>Salmonella</em>, with no significant differences in log reductions (<em>p</em> > 0.05). In contrast, <em>E. coli</em> surrogate panel and <em>P. acidilactici</em> showed significantly greater reductions, making them unsuitable surrogate candidates for <em>Salmonella</em>. Matrices and RH interactions influenced survival, but <em>E. faecium</em> consistently mirrored <em>Salmonella</em> behavior. <em>E. faecium</em> was similar but hardier than <em>Salmonella</em> LMF PBPs and could be used in processing environments for challenging and validating sanitation protocols.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 100578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001309\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Salmonella enterica Surrogate for Future Validation Studies for Nonfat Dried Milk and Low-Moisture Food Environments
Low-moisture food persistent bacterial populations (LMF PBPs) may be responsible for pathogen harborage in LMF processing environments, resulting in outbreaks and recalls. To address this issue, industry requires a surrogate to understand the survivability of LMF PBP and perform in-plant validation studies to reduce the level of this pathogen to an acceptable level. Hygienic controls for the LMF industry must be tailored to different equipment, environments, and food types. In-plant validations with a surrogate would assist with evaluating the efficacy of sanitation protocols that eliminate LMF PBPs and harborage. This study explored surrogates for Salmonella LMF PBP to provide tools for challenge studies to eliminate LMF PBPs from stainless-steel surfaces. Three surrogates (Escherichia coli MP 26, Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici) were evaluated for similarity to a Salmonella LMF PBP in nonfat dried milk (NFDM) formed on stainless steel coupons stored at 30% or 70% relative humidity (RH) at 25 °C. Coupons were prepared with a previously established method to form an LMF PBP (0.5 g of NFDM, 0.4 mL culture). Microbial survival was enumerated at intervals (0, 1, 3, 5, and 7 days) using standard plating techniques. An ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD tests were used to compare log reductions to identify suitable surrogates. E. faecium exhibited higher survival trends that were most similar to Salmonella, with no significant differences in log reductions (p > 0.05). In contrast, E. coli surrogate panel and P. acidilactici showed significantly greater reductions, making them unsuitable surrogate candidates for Salmonella. Matrices and RH interactions influenced survival, but E. faecium consistently mirrored Salmonella behavior. E. faecium was similar but hardier than Salmonella LMF PBPs and could be used in processing environments for challenging and validating sanitation protocols.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with:
Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain;
Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality;
Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation;
Food fermentations and food-related probiotics;
Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers;
Risk assessments for food-related hazards;
Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods;
Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.