普瑞巴林治疗韩国成人不宁腿综合征的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Yong Won Cho, Won Chul Shin, Jung-Ick Byun, Jung-Won Shin, Ki-Young Jung
{"title":"普瑞巴林治疗韩国成人不宁腿综合征的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验","authors":"Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Yong Won Cho, Won Chul Shin, Jung-Ick Byun, Jung-Won Shin, Ki-Young Jung","doi":"10.3988/jcn.2025.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in Korean adults with restless legs syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 78 patients with RLS with an International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 were randomized 1:1 to receive either pregabalin (<i>n</i>=39) or placebo (<i>n</i>=39) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the IRLS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and changes in scores on other RLS symptom questionnaires. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161027).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the mean IRLS scores were 23.2±5.8 in the pregabalin and 24.5±5.2 in the placebo group (<i>p</i>=0.297). After 12 weeks, the baseline-adjusted change in the IRLS score was -6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.3 to -4.3) in the pregabalin group and -5.4 (95% CI -7.9 to -2.8) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i>=0.420). The secondary efficacy outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of TEAE was similar between the two groups (48.7% vs. 51.3%, <i>p</i>=0.821), with dizziness being the most common TEAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study failed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of pregabalin compared with placebo for RLS in Korean adults. Possible reasons for the negative results include low dose, insufficient sample size, and substantial placebo response. Further investigations are warranted to optimize pregabalin therapy in Korean adults with RLS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","volume":"21 4","pages":"325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jun-Sang Sunwoo, Yong Won Cho, Won Chul Shin, Jung-Ick Byun, Jung-Won Shin, Ki-Young Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.3988/jcn.2025.0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in Korean adults with restless legs syndrome (RLS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 78 patients with RLS with an International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 were randomized 1:1 to receive either pregabalin (<i>n</i>=39) or placebo (<i>n</i>=39) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the IRLS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and changes in scores on other RLS symptom questionnaires. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161027).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the mean IRLS scores were 23.2±5.8 in the pregabalin and 24.5±5.2 in the placebo group (<i>p</i>=0.297). After 12 weeks, the baseline-adjusted change in the IRLS score was -6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.3 to -4.3) in the pregabalin group and -5.4 (95% CI -7.9 to -2.8) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (<i>p</i>=0.420). The secondary efficacy outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of TEAE was similar between the two groups (48.7% vs. 51.3%, <i>p</i>=0.821), with dizziness being the most common TEAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study failed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of pregabalin compared with placebo for RLS in Korean adults. Possible reasons for the negative results include low dose, insufficient sample size, and substantial placebo response. Further investigations are warranted to optimize pregabalin therapy in Korean adults with RLS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"325-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303681/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2025.0092\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2025.0092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:评价普瑞巴林治疗韩国成人不宁腿综合征(RLS)的临床疗效和安全性。方法:在这项随机、多中心、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,78名国际不宁腿量表(IRLS)评分≥15分的RLS患者被1:1随机分配,接受普瑞巴林(n=39)或安慰剂(n=39)治疗12周。主要疗效指标为IRLS评分的变化,次要疗效指标包括临床总体印象改善量表和其他RLS症状问卷评分的变化。通过监测治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)来评估安全性。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04161027)。结果:在基线时,普瑞巴林组的平均IRLS评分为23.2±5.8分,安慰剂组为24.5±5.2分(p=0.297)。12周后,普瑞巴林组IRLS评分基线调整变化为-6.8(95%可信区间[CI] -9.3至-4.3),安慰剂组为-5.4(95%可信区间[CI] -7.9至-2.8),两组间无显著差异(p=0.420)。两组间的次要疗效结果无差异。两组患者的TEAE发生率相似(48.7% vs. 51.3%, p=0.821),其中头晕是最常见的TEAE。结论:本研究未能证明普瑞巴林与安慰剂相比对韩国成人RLS的治疗效果。阴性结果的可能原因包括低剂量、样本量不足和大量安慰剂反应。需要进一步的研究来优化普瑞巴林治疗韩国成人RLS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin for Restless Legs Syndrome in Korean Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Background and purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin in Korean adults with restless legs syndrome (RLS).

Methods: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 78 patients with RLS with an International Restless Legs Scale (IRLS) score ≥15 were randomized 1:1 to receive either pregabalin (n=39) or placebo (n=39) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in the IRLS score, and the secondary outcomes included the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale and changes in scores on other RLS symptom questionnaires. Safety was assessed by monitoring treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04161027).

Results: At baseline, the mean IRLS scores were 23.2±5.8 in the pregabalin and 24.5±5.2 in the placebo group (p=0.297). After 12 weeks, the baseline-adjusted change in the IRLS score was -6.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -9.3 to -4.3) in the pregabalin group and -5.4 (95% CI -7.9 to -2.8) in the placebo group, with no significant difference between the groups (p=0.420). The secondary efficacy outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The incidence of TEAE was similar between the two groups (48.7% vs. 51.3%, p=0.821), with dizziness being the most common TEAE.

Conclusions: This study failed to demonstrate the therapeutic effect of pregabalin compared with placebo for RLS in Korean adults. Possible reasons for the negative results include low dose, insufficient sample size, and substantial placebo response. Further investigations are warranted to optimize pregabalin therapy in Korean adults with RLS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurology
Journal of Clinical Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCN aims to publish the cutting-edge research from around the world. The JCN covers clinical and translational research for physicians and researchers in the field of neurology. Encompassing the entire neurological diseases, our main focus is on the common disorders including stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson''s disease, dementia, multiple sclerosis, headache, and peripheral neuropathy. Any authors affiliated with an accredited biomedical institution may submit manuscripts of original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor. The JCN will allow clinical neurologists to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信