药物治疗方法对术后谵妄的有效治疗:发挥状态。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Eric Toyota, Verinder Sharma
{"title":"药物治疗方法对术后谵妄的有效治疗:发挥状态。","authors":"Eric Toyota, Verinder Sharma","doi":"10.1080/14737175.2025.2532075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-operative delirium (POD) is a common neuropsychiatric complication that is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and persistent cognitive deficits. Despite its clinical relevance, pharmacologic treatment options remain limited and inconsistently supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, the authors synthesize the current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying POD then critically evaluate the evidence around pharmacotherapeutic interventions, focusing on the use of antipsychotics, cholinesterase inhibitors, sleep-wake cycle modulators, and dexmedetomidine, in the treatment of established delirium. Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There remains insufficient evidence to support the routine use of pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of POD. While the evidence supporting dexmedetomidine seems most promising, its clinical significance is questionable and therefore its impact is likely in prevention rather than treatment. Various methodological challenges, including heterogeneity in trial design and insufficient stratification by delirium subtype, hinder generalizability of study results and advancements in how delirium is understood. Future progress will depend on reconceptualizing delirium away from a purely descriptive condition and toward a heterogenous, biologically driven disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":12190,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacotherapeutic approaches for the effective treatment of postoperative delirium: the state of play.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Toyota, Verinder Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737175.2025.2532075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-operative delirium (POD) is a common neuropsychiatric complication that is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and persistent cognitive deficits. Despite its clinical relevance, pharmacologic treatment options remain limited and inconsistently supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review, the authors synthesize the current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying POD then critically evaluate the evidence around pharmacotherapeutic interventions, focusing on the use of antipsychotics, cholinesterase inhibitors, sleep-wake cycle modulators, and dexmedetomidine, in the treatment of established delirium. Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There remains insufficient evidence to support the routine use of pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of POD. While the evidence supporting dexmedetomidine seems most promising, its clinical significance is questionable and therefore its impact is likely in prevention rather than treatment. Various methodological challenges, including heterogeneity in trial design and insufficient stratification by delirium subtype, hinder generalizability of study results and advancements in how delirium is understood. Future progress will depend on reconceptualizing delirium away from a purely descriptive condition and toward a heterogenous, biologically driven disorder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2532075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2532075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:术后谵妄(POD)是一种常见的神经精神并发症,与发病率增加、住院时间延长和持续认知缺陷有关。尽管其临床相关性,药物治疗选择仍然有限,证据支持不一致。涵盖的领域:在这篇综述中,作者综合了目前对POD的病理生理机制的理解,然后批判性地评估了药物治疗干预的证据,重点是抗精神病药、胆碱酯酶抑制剂、睡眠-觉醒周期调节剂和右美托咪定在治疗谵妄中的应用。使用PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库确定相关文章。专家意见:目前仍没有足够的证据支持在POD治疗中常规使用药物干预。虽然支持右美托咪定的证据似乎最有希望,但其临床意义值得怀疑,因此其影响可能是预防而不是治疗。各种方法学上的挑战,包括试验设计的异质性和谵妄亚型的分层不足,阻碍了研究结果的推广和对谵妄理解的进展。未来的进展将取决于对谵妄的重新概念化,从纯粹的描述性条件转向异质性,生物学驱动的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacotherapeutic approaches for the effective treatment of postoperative delirium: the state of play.

Introduction: Post-operative delirium (POD) is a common neuropsychiatric complication that is associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospital stays, and persistent cognitive deficits. Despite its clinical relevance, pharmacologic treatment options remain limited and inconsistently supported by evidence.

Areas covered: In this review, the authors synthesize the current understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying POD then critically evaluate the evidence around pharmacotherapeutic interventions, focusing on the use of antipsychotics, cholinesterase inhibitors, sleep-wake cycle modulators, and dexmedetomidine, in the treatment of established delirium. Relevant articles were identified using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.

Expert opinion: There remains insufficient evidence to support the routine use of pharmacologic interventions in the treatment of POD. While the evidence supporting dexmedetomidine seems most promising, its clinical significance is questionable and therefore its impact is likely in prevention rather than treatment. Various methodological challenges, including heterogeneity in trial design and insufficient stratification by delirium subtype, hinder generalizability of study results and advancements in how delirium is understood. Future progress will depend on reconceptualizing delirium away from a purely descriptive condition and toward a heterogenous, biologically driven disorder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (ISSN 1473-7175) provides expert reviews on the use of drugs and medicines in clinical neurology and neuropsychiatry. Coverage includes disease management, new medicines and drugs in neurology, therapeutic indications, diagnostics, medical treatment guidelines and neurological diseases such as stroke, epilepsy, Alzheimer''s and Parkinson''s. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信