早期液体复苏对脓毒症死亡率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Michael A Ward, Hani I Kuttab, Robert G Badgett
{"title":"早期液体复苏对脓毒症死亡率的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Michael A Ward, Hani I Kuttab, Robert G Badgett","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While general agreement exists on many sepsis management principles, the details of early fluid resuscitation in sepsis remain contentious. The aim of the current review is to examine the impact of early (≤ 8 hr) fluid dosing, timing, and guideline-based resuscitation on mortality in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000, to November 8, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials and observational data, adjusting for confounding, for adults (≥ 18 yr) with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>From 2,169 citations, 30 studies with 119,583 patients were included.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Dosing: three randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more liberal (~43-72 mL/kg) vs. more restrictive (as low as 30 mL/kg) fluid resuscitative strategies (relative risk, 1.00 [0.81-1.24]). Eleven of 13 studies observed mortality risk when low-fluid volumes were administered (< 20 mL/kg; effect direction/sign test: p < 0.001). Six of 11 studies observed mortality risk when fluid volume dosing exceeded higher limits (> 45 mL/kg; p = 0.55). Timing: four of four studies observed a survival benefit with earlier completion of 30 mL/kg (within 3 hr; p = 0.12). Thirty mL/kg by discrete time: less than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 2 hours-two studies observed survival benefit; less than or equal to 3 hours-one study observed survival benefit and three studies observed no mortality impact; and less than or equal to 6 hours-two studies observed a survival benefit, four studies observed no impact, and two studies observed increased mortality risk (both > 30 groups received > 50 and > 70 mL/kg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For fluid resuscitation within 8 hours of sepsis diagnosis: 1) randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more restrictive and more liberal fluid resuscitative strategies (certainty of evidence: low); 2) dosing less than 20 mL/kg has an effect on increased mortality (low certainty); 3) observational studies trend toward increased mortality with higher volume resuscitation (> 45 mL/kg) but are not supported by randomized trials (very low certainty); and 4) survival benefit is observed when 30 mL/kg is completed within 3 hours (low certainty).</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Early Fluid Resuscitation on Mortality in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Michael A Ward, Hani I Kuttab, Robert G Badgett\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006769\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While general agreement exists on many sepsis management principles, the details of early fluid resuscitation in sepsis remain contentious. The aim of the current review is to examine the impact of early (≤ 8 hr) fluid dosing, timing, and guideline-based resuscitation on mortality in sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000, to November 8, 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials and observational data, adjusting for confounding, for adults (≥ 18 yr) with sepsis.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>From 2,169 citations, 30 studies with 119,583 patients were included.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Dosing: three randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more liberal (~43-72 mL/kg) vs. more restrictive (as low as 30 mL/kg) fluid resuscitative strategies (relative risk, 1.00 [0.81-1.24]). Eleven of 13 studies observed mortality risk when low-fluid volumes were administered (< 20 mL/kg; effect direction/sign test: p < 0.001). Six of 11 studies observed mortality risk when fluid volume dosing exceeded higher limits (> 45 mL/kg; p = 0.55). Timing: four of four studies observed a survival benefit with earlier completion of 30 mL/kg (within 3 hr; p = 0.12). Thirty mL/kg by discrete time: less than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 2 hours-two studies observed survival benefit; less than or equal to 3 hours-one study observed survival benefit and three studies observed no mortality impact; and less than or equal to 6 hours-two studies observed a survival benefit, four studies observed no impact, and two studies observed increased mortality risk (both > 30 groups received > 50 and > 70 mL/kg).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For fluid resuscitation within 8 hours of sepsis diagnosis: 1) randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more restrictive and more liberal fluid resuscitative strategies (certainty of evidence: low); 2) dosing less than 20 mL/kg has an effect on increased mortality (low certainty); 3) observational studies trend toward increased mortality with higher volume resuscitation (> 45 mL/kg) but are not supported by randomized trials (very low certainty); and 4) survival benefit is observed when 30 mL/kg is completed within 3 hours (low certainty).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006769\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006769","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然在脓毒症的许多管理原则上存在普遍的共识,但脓毒症早期液体复苏的细节仍然存在争议。本综述的目的是研究早期(≤8小时)液体剂量、时间和基于指南的复苏对败血症死亡率的影响。数据来源:PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane和谷歌Scholar, 2000年1月1日至2024年11月8日。研究选择:随机对照试验和观察性数据,调整混杂因素,针对成人(≥18岁)败血症。数据提取:从2169篇引文中,纳入了30项研究,共119,583例患者。数据综合:剂量:三个随机试验表明,更自由(~43-72 mL/kg)和更严格(低至30 mL/kg)的液体复苏策略(相对风险为1.00[0.81-1.24])的死亡率没有差异。13项研究中有11项观察到低液量(< 20 mL/kg;效果方向/符号检验:p < 0.001)。11项研究中有6项观察到,当液体体积剂量超过较高限值(45毫升/公斤;P = 0.55)。时间:四项研究中的四项观察到早期完成30ml /kg(在3小时内;P = 0.12)。30 mL/kg按离散时间计算:小于或等于1和小于或等于2小时-两项研究观察到生存获益;少于或等于3小时——一项研究观察到生存获益,三项研究观察到无死亡率影响;小于或等于6小时——两项研究观察到生存获益,四项研究观察到无影响,两项研究观察到死亡风险增加(bbb30组均接受bbb50和bbb70 mL/kg)。结论:对于脓毒症诊断后8小时内进行液体复苏:1)随机试验表明,更严格的液体复苏策略与更自由的液体复苏策略之间没有死亡率差异(证据确定性低);2)剂量低于20ml /kg会增加死亡率(低确定性);3)观察性研究倾向于高容量复苏(> 45 mL/kg)会增加死亡率,但没有随机试验的支持(非常低的确定性);4)当在3小时内完成30 mL/kg时观察到生存获益(低确定性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Early Fluid Resuscitation on Mortality in Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: While general agreement exists on many sepsis management principles, the details of early fluid resuscitation in sepsis remain contentious. The aim of the current review is to examine the impact of early (≤ 8 hr) fluid dosing, timing, and guideline-based resuscitation on mortality in sepsis.

Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000, to November 8, 2024.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials and observational data, adjusting for confounding, for adults (≥ 18 yr) with sepsis.

Data extraction: From 2,169 citations, 30 studies with 119,583 patients were included.

Data synthesis: Dosing: three randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more liberal (~43-72 mL/kg) vs. more restrictive (as low as 30 mL/kg) fluid resuscitative strategies (relative risk, 1.00 [0.81-1.24]). Eleven of 13 studies observed mortality risk when low-fluid volumes were administered (< 20 mL/kg; effect direction/sign test: p < 0.001). Six of 11 studies observed mortality risk when fluid volume dosing exceeded higher limits (> 45 mL/kg; p = 0.55). Timing: four of four studies observed a survival benefit with earlier completion of 30 mL/kg (within 3 hr; p = 0.12). Thirty mL/kg by discrete time: less than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to 2 hours-two studies observed survival benefit; less than or equal to 3 hours-one study observed survival benefit and three studies observed no mortality impact; and less than or equal to 6 hours-two studies observed a survival benefit, four studies observed no impact, and two studies observed increased mortality risk (both > 30 groups received > 50 and > 70 mL/kg).

Conclusions: For fluid resuscitation within 8 hours of sepsis diagnosis: 1) randomized trials suggest no mortality difference between more restrictive and more liberal fluid resuscitative strategies (certainty of evidence: low); 2) dosing less than 20 mL/kg has an effect on increased mortality (low certainty); 3) observational studies trend toward increased mortality with higher volume resuscitation (> 45 mL/kg) but are not supported by randomized trials (very low certainty); and 4) survival benefit is observed when 30 mL/kg is completed within 3 hours (low certainty).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信