乳房切除术后乳房植入物重建的区域麻醉无阿片类药物:一项随机对照研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Croatian Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-05
Domagoj Eljuga, Rhea Marie Mužar, Ivo Jurišić, Jasminka Peršec, Ksenija Eljuga, Josip Jaman, Željka Roje, Krešimir Martić, Zlatko Vlajčić, Rado Žic
{"title":"乳房切除术后乳房植入物重建的区域麻醉无阿片类药物:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Domagoj Eljuga, Rhea Marie Mužar, Ivo Jurišić, Jasminka Peršec, Ksenija Eljuga, Josip Jaman, Željka Roje, Krešimir Martić, Zlatko Vlajčić, Rado Žic","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare regional anesthesia without opioid administration following subcutaneous mastectomy and breast reconstruction with implants in the pre-pectoral plane with general anesthesia in terms of pain relief, opioid consumption, and hospital stay duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study enrolled patients who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction of the breast either with permanent implants or tissue expander placement in the pre-pectoral plane. A total of 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. The regional anesthesia group (n=20) received a pectoralis muscle block (PECS I), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and serratus anterior muscle plane block (SAP) following a uniform protocol, and the control group (n=20) underwent general anesthesia. Pain was assessed by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) from 30 minutes after surgery up to ten days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS pain scores were significantly higher in the regional anesthesia group, independent of the patients' physical daily activity level, even up to 10 days after surgery. Opioid consumption and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regional anesthesia using a combination of a TBVP, PECS I, and SAP has a long-lasting and satisfactory analgesic effect without the introduction of opioids. In the future, a novel gold standard protocol should be established that can be offered to every patient undergoing breast surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":10796,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Medical Journal","volume":"66 3","pages":"213-219"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional anesthesia without opioid administration in mastectomy surgeries followed by breast reconstruction with implants: a randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Domagoj Eljuga, Rhea Marie Mužar, Ivo Jurišić, Jasminka Peršec, Ksenija Eljuga, Josip Jaman, Željka Roje, Krešimir Martić, Zlatko Vlajčić, Rado Žic\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare regional anesthesia without opioid administration following subcutaneous mastectomy and breast reconstruction with implants in the pre-pectoral plane with general anesthesia in terms of pain relief, opioid consumption, and hospital stay duration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled study enrolled patients who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction of the breast either with permanent implants or tissue expander placement in the pre-pectoral plane. A total of 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. The regional anesthesia group (n=20) received a pectoralis muscle block (PECS I), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and serratus anterior muscle plane block (SAP) following a uniform protocol, and the control group (n=20) underwent general anesthesia. Pain was assessed by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) from 30 minutes after surgery up to ten days postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NRS pain scores were significantly higher in the regional anesthesia group, independent of the patients' physical daily activity level, even up to 10 days after surgery. Opioid consumption and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Regional anesthesia using a combination of a TBVP, PECS I, and SAP has a long-lasting and satisfactory analgesic effect without the introduction of opioids. In the future, a novel gold standard protocol should be established that can be offered to every patient undergoing breast surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Croatian Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"213-219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12246971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Croatian Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较无阿片类药物区域麻醉与全麻在乳房切除术和胸前平面植入乳房再造术后疼痛缓解、阿片类药物消耗和住院时间方面的差异。方法:这项随机对照研究纳入了接受乳房切除术并在胸前平面植入永久性植入物或组织扩张器重建乳房的患者。共有40例患者符合纳入标准。区域麻醉组(n=20)按统一方案行胸肌阻滞(PECS I)、胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)、前锯肌平面阻滞(SAP),对照组(n=20)行全身麻醉。从术后30分钟到术后10天,采用数值评定量表(NRS)对疼痛进行评估。结果:区域麻醉组的NRS疼痛评分明显高于区域麻醉组,且与患者的日常体力活动水平无关,甚至在术后10天内也存在差异。阿片类药物的消耗和住院时间没有显著差异。结论:在不引入阿片类药物的情况下,TBVP、PECS I和SAP联合局部麻醉具有持久、满意的镇痛效果。在未来,应该建立一个新的金标准方案,可以提供给每一个接受乳房手术的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional anesthesia without opioid administration in mastectomy surgeries followed by breast reconstruction with implants: a randomized controlled study.

Aim: To compare regional anesthesia without opioid administration following subcutaneous mastectomy and breast reconstruction with implants in the pre-pectoral plane with general anesthesia in terms of pain relief, opioid consumption, and hospital stay duration.

Methods: This randomized controlled study enrolled patients who underwent mastectomy with reconstruction of the breast either with permanent implants or tissue expander placement in the pre-pectoral plane. A total of 40 patients met the inclusion criteria. The regional anesthesia group (n=20) received a pectoralis muscle block (PECS I), thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), and serratus anterior muscle plane block (SAP) following a uniform protocol, and the control group (n=20) underwent general anesthesia. Pain was assessed by using the numeric rating scale (NRS) from 30 minutes after surgery up to ten days postoperatively.

Results: NRS pain scores were significantly higher in the regional anesthesia group, independent of the patients' physical daily activity level, even up to 10 days after surgery. Opioid consumption and length of hospital stay did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: Regional anesthesia using a combination of a TBVP, PECS I, and SAP has a long-lasting and satisfactory analgesic effect without the introduction of opioids. In the future, a novel gold standard protocol should be established that can be offered to every patient undergoing breast surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Croatian Medical Journal
Croatian Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Medical Journal (CMJ) is an international peer reviewed journal open to scientists from all fields of biomedicine and health related research. Although CMJ welcomes all contributions that increase and expand on medical knowledge, the two areas are of the special interest: topics globally relevant for biomedicine and health and medicine in developing and emerging countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信