女性和男性-女性联合骨盆损伤风险函数在正面膝带负荷条件下。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Connor Hanggi, Joon Seok Kong, James Caldwell, Bronislaw Gepner, Martin Ӧstling, Jason R. Kerrigan
{"title":"女性和男性-女性联合骨盆损伤风险函数在正面膝带负荷条件下。","authors":"Connor Hanggi,&nbsp;Joon Seok Kong,&nbsp;James Caldwell,&nbsp;Bronislaw Gepner,&nbsp;Martin Ӧstling,&nbsp;Jason R. Kerrigan","doi":"10.1007/s10439-025-03777-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Iliac wing fractures due to lap belt loading have been observed in laboratory settings for 50 years and recent data suggest they are also occurring in the field. Automated driving systems (ADS) and other occupant compartment advancements are expected to offer enhanced flexibility in seating orientation, which could place a greater reliance on the seatbelt to restrain occupants. Such changes may increase seatbelt loads and create new challenges in successfully restraining occupants and mitigating injury to areas, such as the pelvis. Injury criteria exist for component-level male iliac wing fractures resulting from frontal lap belt loading, but not for females.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study explored female iliac wing fracture tolerance in the same loading environment as a previous study that explored the fracture tolerance of isolated male iliac wings. Male and female fracture data were combined to evaluate the effect of sex. Injury risk functions were created by fitting Weibull survival models to data that integrated censored and exact failure observations.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty female iliac wings were tested; fourteen of them sustained fracture with known failure forces (exact), but the remaining six wings either (1) did not fracture or (2) fractured after an event that changed the boundary conditions (right-censored). The fracture tolerance of the tested specimens ranged widely (1134–8759 N) and averaged 4240 N (SD 2516 N).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Female data and combined male–female data were analyzed. Age was the only covariate investigated in this study that had a statistically significant effect and improved the predictive performance of the models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7986,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","volume":"53 10","pages":"2669 - 2678"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10439-025-03777-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Female and Combined Male–Female Injury Risk Functions for the Anterior Pelvis Under Frontal Lap Belt Loading Conditions\",\"authors\":\"Connor Hanggi,&nbsp;Joon Seok Kong,&nbsp;James Caldwell,&nbsp;Bronislaw Gepner,&nbsp;Martin Ӧstling,&nbsp;Jason R. Kerrigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10439-025-03777-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Iliac wing fractures due to lap belt loading have been observed in laboratory settings for 50 years and recent data suggest they are also occurring in the field. Automated driving systems (ADS) and other occupant compartment advancements are expected to offer enhanced flexibility in seating orientation, which could place a greater reliance on the seatbelt to restrain occupants. Such changes may increase seatbelt loads and create new challenges in successfully restraining occupants and mitigating injury to areas, such as the pelvis. Injury criteria exist for component-level male iliac wing fractures resulting from frontal lap belt loading, but not for females.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study explored female iliac wing fracture tolerance in the same loading environment as a previous study that explored the fracture tolerance of isolated male iliac wings. Male and female fracture data were combined to evaluate the effect of sex. Injury risk functions were created by fitting Weibull survival models to data that integrated censored and exact failure observations.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty female iliac wings were tested; fourteen of them sustained fracture with known failure forces (exact), but the remaining six wings either (1) did not fracture or (2) fractured after an event that changed the boundary conditions (right-censored). The fracture tolerance of the tested specimens ranged widely (1134–8759 N) and averaged 4240 N (SD 2516 N).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Female data and combined male–female data were analyzed. Age was the only covariate investigated in this study that had a statistically significant effect and improved the predictive performance of the models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"2669 - 2678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10439-025-03777-0.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-025-03777-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-025-03777-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在实验室环境中观察到由膝带载荷引起的髂翼骨折已有50年的历史,最近的数据表明这种情况也在现场发生。自动驾驶系统(ADS)和其他乘员舱的改进有望提供更大的座位方向灵活性,这可能会更多地依赖安全带来约束乘员。这些变化可能会增加安全带的负荷,并为成功地约束乘员和减轻对骨盆等区域的伤害带来新的挑战。损伤标准存在于前部搭带载荷导致的男性髂骨骨折,但不适用于女性。方法:本研究与之前研究离体男性髂翼的骨折耐受性的研究一样,在相同的负载环境下研究女性髂翼的骨折耐受性。将男性和女性骨折数据结合起来评估性别的影响。伤害风险函数是通过将威布尔生存模型拟合到集成了审查和精确失效观察的数据中来创建的。结果:共检测20只雌性髂翅;其中14个在已知破坏力的情况下持续断裂(准确),但其余6个机翼要么(1)没有断裂,要么(2)在改变边界条件的事件后断裂(右截)。试样的断裂耐受性范围很广(1134-8759 N),平均为4240 N (SD 2516 N)。结论:对女性资料及男女合并资料进行分析。年龄是本研究中唯一具有统计学显著影响并提高模型预测性能的协变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Female and Combined Male–Female Injury Risk Functions for the Anterior Pelvis Under Frontal Lap Belt Loading Conditions

Purpose

Iliac wing fractures due to lap belt loading have been observed in laboratory settings for 50 years and recent data suggest they are also occurring in the field. Automated driving systems (ADS) and other occupant compartment advancements are expected to offer enhanced flexibility in seating orientation, which could place a greater reliance on the seatbelt to restrain occupants. Such changes may increase seatbelt loads and create new challenges in successfully restraining occupants and mitigating injury to areas, such as the pelvis. Injury criteria exist for component-level male iliac wing fractures resulting from frontal lap belt loading, but not for females.

Methods

This study explored female iliac wing fracture tolerance in the same loading environment as a previous study that explored the fracture tolerance of isolated male iliac wings. Male and female fracture data were combined to evaluate the effect of sex. Injury risk functions were created by fitting Weibull survival models to data that integrated censored and exact failure observations.

Results

Twenty female iliac wings were tested; fourteen of them sustained fracture with known failure forces (exact), but the remaining six wings either (1) did not fracture or (2) fractured after an event that changed the boundary conditions (right-censored). The fracture tolerance of the tested specimens ranged widely (1134–8759 N) and averaged 4240 N (SD 2516 N).

Conclusion

Female data and combined male–female data were analyzed. Age was the only covariate investigated in this study that had a statistically significant effect and improved the predictive performance of the models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Biomedical Engineering is an official journal of the Biomedical Engineering Society, publishing original articles in the major fields of bioengineering and biomedical engineering. The Annals is an interdisciplinary and international journal with the aim to highlight integrated approaches to the solutions of biological and biomedical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信