整个欧洲的奖学金:来自欧洲眼科调查委员会的见解。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rémi Yaïci, Helena Prior Filipe, Lauriana Solecki, Léa Dormegny, Emilia Koestel, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill, Rimvydas Asoklis, Huban Atilla, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Denise Curtin, Barbara Cvenkel, Lisa Flanagan, Brendan Strong, Tero T Kivelä, Anna Maino, Rafael Martinez Costa, Renata Ivekovic, Siegfried Priglinger, Christian Pruente, Marcin Stopa, Marie José Tassignon, Wagih Aclimandos, Tristan Bourcier
{"title":"整个欧洲的奖学金:来自欧洲眼科调查委员会的见解。","authors":"Rémi Yaïci, Helena Prior Filipe, Lauriana Solecki, Léa Dormegny, Emilia Koestel, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill, Rimvydas Asoklis, Huban Atilla, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Denise Curtin, Barbara Cvenkel, Lisa Flanagan, Brendan Strong, Tero T Kivelä, Anna Maino, Rafael Martinez Costa, Renata Ivekovic, Siegfried Priglinger, Christian Pruente, Marcin Stopa, Marie José Tassignon, Wagih Aclimandos, Tristan Bourcier","doi":"10.1111/aos.17555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Analyse the results of a European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) survey on post-residency training (fellowship) opportunities across Europe, providing insights from ophthalmic educators on the current landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous 31-question online survey distributed to educators in all EBO-affiliated countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 61% with participation of 392 ophthalmic educators. Despite broad participation, Southwestern Europe was overrepresented, while Northern and Central Europe were underrepresented, affecting regional balance. Respondents had a mean age of 51 ± 11 years, with 37.8% as professors and 46.6% as department heads. Most (54.1%) were affiliated with university hospitals. The reported median percentage of residents pursuing post-residency training was 25%, varying between 15% and 100%, with 15.3% of respondents uncertain about their existence, especially in non-university hospitals. Post-residency training durations were predominantly 1 or 2 years. National diplomas were highly valued except in the United Kingdom; language proficiency was required in 84.2% of countries. Respondents reported a median of three positions per department, with 60% filled by local residents. Surgical activity accounted for 65%, with regional variations, whereas 40% of positions involved research. Observerships remained rare (10%). Financial compensation was provided in 67% of cases. A national medical licence was deemed essential, whereas the EBO diploma and letters of recommendation were moderately valued, especially in Northern Europe. Fellowships were highly recommended by 76.2%, while 63% believed that grants would improve access to positions.</p><p><strong>Conlusion: </strong>This survey represents the largest data set on post-residency training in Europe. Results highlight a lack of cohesion in fellowship opportunities, with many respondents uncertain about national programmes. A national medical licence remains the primary requirement, while language proficiency and financial support are key factors influencing access. Institutional support for medical educators is increasing, yet challenges persist regarding time, resources and funding. Focusing on subspecialty training and research, fellowships are crucial for career progression. Expanding training opportunities through international initiatives could further enhance accessibility and standardisation across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fellowships across Europe: Insights from the European Board of Ophthalmology Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Rémi Yaïci, Helena Prior Filipe, Lauriana Solecki, Léa Dormegny, Emilia Koestel, Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill, Rimvydas Asoklis, Huban Atilla, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Denise Curtin, Barbara Cvenkel, Lisa Flanagan, Brendan Strong, Tero T Kivelä, Anna Maino, Rafael Martinez Costa, Renata Ivekovic, Siegfried Priglinger, Christian Pruente, Marcin Stopa, Marie José Tassignon, Wagih Aclimandos, Tristan Bourcier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.17555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Analyse the results of a European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) survey on post-residency training (fellowship) opportunities across Europe, providing insights from ophthalmic educators on the current landscape.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous 31-question online survey distributed to educators in all EBO-affiliated countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 61% with participation of 392 ophthalmic educators. Despite broad participation, Southwestern Europe was overrepresented, while Northern and Central Europe were underrepresented, affecting regional balance. Respondents had a mean age of 51 ± 11 years, with 37.8% as professors and 46.6% as department heads. Most (54.1%) were affiliated with university hospitals. The reported median percentage of residents pursuing post-residency training was 25%, varying between 15% and 100%, with 15.3% of respondents uncertain about their existence, especially in non-university hospitals. Post-residency training durations were predominantly 1 or 2 years. National diplomas were highly valued except in the United Kingdom; language proficiency was required in 84.2% of countries. Respondents reported a median of three positions per department, with 60% filled by local residents. Surgical activity accounted for 65%, with regional variations, whereas 40% of positions involved research. Observerships remained rare (10%). Financial compensation was provided in 67% of cases. A national medical licence was deemed essential, whereas the EBO diploma and letters of recommendation were moderately valued, especially in Northern Europe. Fellowships were highly recommended by 76.2%, while 63% believed that grants would improve access to positions.</p><p><strong>Conlusion: </strong>This survey represents the largest data set on post-residency training in Europe. Results highlight a lack of cohesion in fellowship opportunities, with many respondents uncertain about national programmes. A national medical licence remains the primary requirement, while language proficiency and financial support are key factors influencing access. Institutional support for medical educators is increasing, yet challenges persist regarding time, resources and funding. Focusing on subspecialty training and research, fellowships are crucial for career progression. Expanding training opportunities through international initiatives could further enhance accessibility and standardisation across Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析欧洲眼科委员会(EBO)对整个欧洲住院医师后培训(奖学金)机会的调查结果,提供眼科教育工作者对当前形势的见解。方法:横断面研究采用匿名31个问题的在线调查,向所有ebo附属国家的教育工作者分发。结果:392名眼科教育工作者参与调查,回复率为61%。尽管参与广泛,但西南欧洲的代表人数过多,而北欧和中欧的代表人数不足,影响了区域平衡。调查对象的平均年龄为51±11岁,其中教授37.8%,系主任46.6%。大多数(54.1%)隶属于大学附属医院。据报道,接受住院医师后培训的住院医师中位数百分比为25%,从15%到100%不等,15.3%的受访者不确定他们的存在,特别是在非大学医院。住院医师后的培训时间主要是1或2年。除英国外,国家文凭受到高度重视;84.2%的国家要求具备语言能力。受访者表示,每个部门中位数为3个职位,其中60%由当地居民填补。手术活动占65%,有区域差异,而40%的职位涉及研究。观察员仍然很少(10%)。67%的案件提供经济赔偿。国家医疗执照被认为是必不可少的,而EBO文凭和推荐信则是中等价值的,特别是在北欧。76.2%的人强烈推荐奖学金,而63%的人认为奖学金会改善获得职位的机会。结论:该调查是欧洲最大的住院医师后培训数据集。结果显示,奖学金机会缺乏凝聚力,许多受访者对国家项目不确定。国家医疗执照仍然是首要要求,而语言能力和财政支持是影响获得医疗服务的关键因素。对医学教育工作者的机构支持正在增加,但在时间、资源和资金方面的挑战仍然存在。奖学金侧重于亚专业培训和研究,对职业发展至关重要。通过国际倡议扩大培训机会可以进一步提高整个欧洲的可及性和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fellowships across Europe: Insights from the European Board of Ophthalmology Survey.

Purpose: Analyse the results of a European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) survey on post-residency training (fellowship) opportunities across Europe, providing insights from ophthalmic educators on the current landscape.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an anonymous 31-question online survey distributed to educators in all EBO-affiliated countries.

Results: The response rate was 61% with participation of 392 ophthalmic educators. Despite broad participation, Southwestern Europe was overrepresented, while Northern and Central Europe were underrepresented, affecting regional balance. Respondents had a mean age of 51 ± 11 years, with 37.8% as professors and 46.6% as department heads. Most (54.1%) were affiliated with university hospitals. The reported median percentage of residents pursuing post-residency training was 25%, varying between 15% and 100%, with 15.3% of respondents uncertain about their existence, especially in non-university hospitals. Post-residency training durations were predominantly 1 or 2 years. National diplomas were highly valued except in the United Kingdom; language proficiency was required in 84.2% of countries. Respondents reported a median of three positions per department, with 60% filled by local residents. Surgical activity accounted for 65%, with regional variations, whereas 40% of positions involved research. Observerships remained rare (10%). Financial compensation was provided in 67% of cases. A national medical licence was deemed essential, whereas the EBO diploma and letters of recommendation were moderately valued, especially in Northern Europe. Fellowships were highly recommended by 76.2%, while 63% believed that grants would improve access to positions.

Conlusion: This survey represents the largest data set on post-residency training in Europe. Results highlight a lack of cohesion in fellowship opportunities, with many respondents uncertain about national programmes. A national medical licence remains the primary requirement, while language proficiency and financial support are key factors influencing access. Institutional support for medical educators is increasing, yet challenges persist regarding time, resources and funding. Focusing on subspecialty training and research, fellowships are crucial for career progression. Expanding training opportunities through international initiatives could further enhance accessibility and standardisation across Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信