利用支持者增加智障人士质性研究访谈的参与

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Sarah A. Hall, Roger J. Stancliffe, Lynda Lahti Anderson
{"title":"利用支持者增加智障人士质性研究访谈的参与","authors":"Sarah A. Hall,&nbsp;Roger J. Stancliffe,&nbsp;Lynda Lahti Anderson","doi":"10.1111/jar.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Researchers need to hear directly from individuals with intellectual disabilities to better understand their experiences and perspectives. However, much inclusive research uses interviews and focuses mainly on people with greater communication skills. One priority is to expand the research techniques used to be more inclusive of people with higher support needs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts identified themes related to a support person's roles in assisting individuals' interview participation. Quantitative analysis identified factors related to the co-creation of responses, including turn-taking.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Supporters helped participants to convey knowledge about the individuals' experiences. They provided encouragement and informational support. Supporters helped explain interview questions and co-create answers. These supporters played a supportive role and did not overpower or silence the responses of research participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Including supporters chosen by research participants with intellectual disabilities as a support person during qualitative research interviews may be an effective tool in inclusive research.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Supporters to Increase Participation in Qualitative Research Interviews by People With Intellectual Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A. Hall,&nbsp;Roger J. Stancliffe,&nbsp;Lynda Lahti Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Researchers need to hear directly from individuals with intellectual disabilities to better understand their experiences and perspectives. However, much inclusive research uses interviews and focuses mainly on people with greater communication skills. One priority is to expand the research techniques used to be more inclusive of people with higher support needs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts identified themes related to a support person's roles in assisting individuals' interview participation. Quantitative analysis identified factors related to the co-creation of responses, including turn-taking.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Supporters helped participants to convey knowledge about the individuals' experiences. They provided encouragement and informational support. Supporters helped explain interview questions and co-create answers. These supporters played a supportive role and did not overpower or silence the responses of research participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Including supporters chosen by research participants with intellectual disabilities as a support person during qualitative research interviews may be an effective tool in inclusive research.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究人员需要直接听取智障人士的意见,以更好地了解他们的经历和观点。然而,许多包容性研究使用访谈,主要关注具有更强沟通技巧的人。一个优先事项是扩大所使用的研究技术,使其更能包括需要更多支持的人。方法对访谈记录进行定性分析,确定与辅助人员在协助个人参与访谈中的角色相关的主题。定量分析确定了与共同创造反应有关的因素,包括轮流。支持者帮助参与者传达个人经历的知识。他们提供鼓励和信息支持。支持者帮助解释面试问题并共同创造答案。这些支持者发挥了支持性作用,并没有压制或压制研究参与者的反应。结论在质性研究访谈中,包括智障研究参与者选择的支持者作为支持人可能是包容性研究的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using Supporters to Increase Participation in Qualitative Research Interviews by People With Intellectual Disabilities

Using Supporters to Increase Participation in Qualitative Research Interviews by People With Intellectual Disabilities

Background

Researchers need to hear directly from individuals with intellectual disabilities to better understand their experiences and perspectives. However, much inclusive research uses interviews and focuses mainly on people with greater communication skills. One priority is to expand the research techniques used to be more inclusive of people with higher support needs.

Method

Qualitative analysis of interview transcripts identified themes related to a support person's roles in assisting individuals' interview participation. Quantitative analysis identified factors related to the co-creation of responses, including turn-taking.

Results

Supporters helped participants to convey knowledge about the individuals' experiences. They provided encouragement and informational support. Supporters helped explain interview questions and co-create answers. These supporters played a supportive role and did not overpower or silence the responses of research participants.

Conclusions

Including supporters chosen by research participants with intellectual disabilities as a support person during qualitative research interviews may be an effective tool in inclusive research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信