{"title":"智障人士的个人幸福感、选择与NDIS的关系","authors":"Vivienne Riches, Trevor Parmenter, Gisselle Gallego, Ziad Al-Rubaie, Mary-Ann O'Donovan, Patricia O'Brien","doi":"10.1111/jar.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funds individualised supports to increase choice and control. The relationship between NDIS individualised funding, outcomes for wellbeing and exercising choice and control for people with intellectual disability has been unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Adult NDIS participants with intellectual disability (<i>N</i> = 62) completed a longitudinal survey with validated instruments exploring personal wellbeing and choice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Personal wellbeing scores were generally positive, with the mean comparable to that found for a similar population over a decade ago. High choice and control were evident for most individuals over everyday matters, but not key life decisions. Living environment and physical and/or mental and emotional health status were associated with the level of satisfaction with personal wellbeing and everyday choice and control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>There is need to better support people with intellectual disability to exercise choice and control over key life decisions and to address disparities in choice and wellbeing associated with living environment, physical and mental and emotional health and future security.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Personal Wellbeing, Choice and NDIS Individualised Planning and Support for People With Intellectual Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Vivienne Riches, Trevor Parmenter, Gisselle Gallego, Ziad Al-Rubaie, Mary-Ann O'Donovan, Patricia O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.70085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funds individualised supports to increase choice and control. The relationship between NDIS individualised funding, outcomes for wellbeing and exercising choice and control for people with intellectual disability has been unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adult NDIS participants with intellectual disability (<i>N</i> = 62) completed a longitudinal survey with validated instruments exploring personal wellbeing and choice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Personal wellbeing scores were generally positive, with the mean comparable to that found for a similar population over a decade ago. High choice and control were evident for most individuals over everyday matters, but not key life decisions. Living environment and physical and/or mental and emotional health status were associated with the level of satisfaction with personal wellbeing and everyday choice and control.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is need to better support people with intellectual disability to exercise choice and control over key life decisions and to address disparities in choice and wellbeing associated with living environment, physical and mental and emotional health and future security.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70085\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70085\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Relationship Between Personal Wellbeing, Choice and NDIS Individualised Planning and Support for People With Intellectual Disabilities
Background
Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) funds individualised supports to increase choice and control. The relationship between NDIS individualised funding, outcomes for wellbeing and exercising choice and control for people with intellectual disability has been unclear.
Method
Adult NDIS participants with intellectual disability (N = 62) completed a longitudinal survey with validated instruments exploring personal wellbeing and choice.
Findings
Personal wellbeing scores were generally positive, with the mean comparable to that found for a similar population over a decade ago. High choice and control were evident for most individuals over everyday matters, but not key life decisions. Living environment and physical and/or mental and emotional health status were associated with the level of satisfaction with personal wellbeing and everyday choice and control.
Conclusions
There is need to better support people with intellectual disability to exercise choice and control over key life decisions and to address disparities in choice and wellbeing associated with living environment, physical and mental and emotional health and future security.
期刊介绍：
JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
