雪避难所:管理温带森林冠层以维持冬季条件

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70302
Melissa A. Pastore, Sarah J. Nelson, Elizabeth A. Burakowski, Alexandra R. Contosta, Anthony W. D'Amato, Sarah Garlick, Edward Lindsey, David A. Lutz, Toni Lyn Morelli, Alexej P. K. Sirén, Grace A. Smith, Aaron Weiskittel
{"title":"雪避难所:管理温带森林冠层以维持冬季条件","authors":"Melissa A. Pastore,&nbsp;Sarah J. Nelson,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Burakowski,&nbsp;Alexandra R. Contosta,&nbsp;Anthony W. D'Amato,&nbsp;Sarah Garlick,&nbsp;Edward Lindsey,&nbsp;David A. Lutz,&nbsp;Toni Lyn Morelli,&nbsp;Alexej P. K. Sirén,&nbsp;Grace A. Smith,&nbsp;Aaron Weiskittel","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Climate change is reducing snowpack across temperate regions with negative consequences for human and natural systems. Because forest canopies create microclimates that preserve snowpack, managing forests to support snow refugia—defined here as areas that remain relatively buffered from contemporary climate change over time that sustain snow quality, quantity, and/or timing appropriate to the landscape—could reduce climate change impacts on snow cover, sustaining the benefits of snow. We review the current understanding of how forest canopies affect snow, finding that while closed-conifer forests and snow interactions have been extensively studied in western North America, there are knowledge gaps for deciduous and mixed forests with dormant season leaf loss. We propose that there is an optimal, intermediate zone along a gradient of dormant season canopy cover (DSCC; the proportion of the ground area covered by the canopy during the dormant season), where peak snowpack depth and the potential for snow refugia will be greatest because the canopy-mediated effects of snowpack sheltering (which can preserve snowpack) outweigh those of snowfall interception (which can limit snowpack). As an initial test of our hypothesis, we leveraged snowpack measurements in the northeastern United States spanning the DSCC gradient (low, &lt;25% DSCC; medium, 25%–50% DSCC; and high, &gt;50% DSCC), including from 2 sites in Old Town, Maine; 12 sites in Acadia National Park, Maine; and 30 sites in the northern White Mountains of New Hampshire. Medium DSCC forests (typically mature mixed coniferous–deciduous forests) exhibited the deepest peak snowpacks, likely due to reduced snowfall interception compared to high DSCC forests and reduced snowpack loss compared to low DSCC forests. Many snow accumulation or snowpack studies focus on the contrast between coniferous and open sites, but our results indicate a need for enhanced focus on mixed canopy sites that could serve as snow refugia. Measurements of snowpack depth and timing across a wider range of forest canopies would advance understanding of canopy–snow interactions, expand the monitoring of changing winters, and support management of forests and snow-dependent species in the face of climate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70302","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Snow refugia: Managing temperate forest canopies to maintain winter conditions\",\"authors\":\"Melissa A. Pastore,&nbsp;Sarah J. Nelson,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Burakowski,&nbsp;Alexandra R. Contosta,&nbsp;Anthony W. D'Amato,&nbsp;Sarah Garlick,&nbsp;Edward Lindsey,&nbsp;David A. Lutz,&nbsp;Toni Lyn Morelli,&nbsp;Alexej P. K. Sirén,&nbsp;Grace A. Smith,&nbsp;Aaron Weiskittel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecs2.70302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Climate change is reducing snowpack across temperate regions with negative consequences for human and natural systems. Because forest canopies create microclimates that preserve snowpack, managing forests to support snow refugia—defined here as areas that remain relatively buffered from contemporary climate change over time that sustain snow quality, quantity, and/or timing appropriate to the landscape—could reduce climate change impacts on snow cover, sustaining the benefits of snow. We review the current understanding of how forest canopies affect snow, finding that while closed-conifer forests and snow interactions have been extensively studied in western North America, there are knowledge gaps for deciduous and mixed forests with dormant season leaf loss. We propose that there is an optimal, intermediate zone along a gradient of dormant season canopy cover (DSCC; the proportion of the ground area covered by the canopy during the dormant season), where peak snowpack depth and the potential for snow refugia will be greatest because the canopy-mediated effects of snowpack sheltering (which can preserve snowpack) outweigh those of snowfall interception (which can limit snowpack). As an initial test of our hypothesis, we leveraged snowpack measurements in the northeastern United States spanning the DSCC gradient (low, &lt;25% DSCC; medium, 25%–50% DSCC; and high, &gt;50% DSCC), including from 2 sites in Old Town, Maine; 12 sites in Acadia National Park, Maine; and 30 sites in the northern White Mountains of New Hampshire. Medium DSCC forests (typically mature mixed coniferous–deciduous forests) exhibited the deepest peak snowpacks, likely due to reduced snowfall interception compared to high DSCC forests and reduced snowpack loss compared to low DSCC forests. Many snow accumulation or snowpack studies focus on the contrast between coniferous and open sites, but our results indicate a need for enhanced focus on mixed canopy sites that could serve as snow refugia. Measurements of snowpack depth and timing across a wider range of forest canopies would advance understanding of canopy–snow interactions, expand the monitoring of changing winters, and support management of forests and snow-dependent species in the face of climate change.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosphere\",\"volume\":\"16 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70302\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70302\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化正在减少温带地区的积雪,对人类和自然系统产生负面影响。由于森林冠层创造了保护积雪的小气候,因此管理森林以支持雪避难所(此处定义为随着时间的推移相对缓冲当代气候变化,维持适合景观的雪质量、数量和/或时间的地区)可以减少气候变化对积雪的影响,维持雪的好处。我们回顾了目前对森林冠层如何影响雪的理解,发现虽然北美西部的封闭针叶林和雪的相互作用已经得到了广泛的研究,但对于落叶和混交林的休眠季节落叶损失存在知识空白。我们提出了一个最佳的中间区,在休眠期冠层覆盖(DSCC;在休眠期被冠层覆盖的地面面积所占的比例,此时的积雪深度和积雪避难所的潜力最大,因为冠层介导的积雪遮蔽(可以保存积雪)的作用大于积雪拦截(可以限制积雪)的作用。作为我们假设的初步检验,我们利用了美国东北部的积雪测量,跨越了DSCC梯度(低,<25% DSCC;中,25%-50% DSCC;和高,>50% DSCC),包括缅因州旧城的两个站点;缅因州阿卡迪亚国家公园的12个地点;以及新罕布什尔州怀特山脉北部的30个地点。中等DSCC森林(通常是成熟的针叶林-落叶混交林)表现出最深的峰值积雪,这可能是由于与高DSCC森林相比,降雪量减少,与低DSCC森林相比,积雪损失减少。许多积雪积累或积雪研究侧重于针叶林和开放地的对比,但我们的研究结果表明,需要加强对可能作为雪避难所的混合冠层的关注。在更广泛的森林冠层范围内测量积雪深度和时间将促进对冠层-积雪相互作用的理解,扩大对冬季变化的监测,并在气候变化的情况下支持森林和雪依赖物种的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Snow refugia: Managing temperate forest canopies to maintain winter conditions

Snow refugia: Managing temperate forest canopies to maintain winter conditions

Climate change is reducing snowpack across temperate regions with negative consequences for human and natural systems. Because forest canopies create microclimates that preserve snowpack, managing forests to support snow refugia—defined here as areas that remain relatively buffered from contemporary climate change over time that sustain snow quality, quantity, and/or timing appropriate to the landscape—could reduce climate change impacts on snow cover, sustaining the benefits of snow. We review the current understanding of how forest canopies affect snow, finding that while closed-conifer forests and snow interactions have been extensively studied in western North America, there are knowledge gaps for deciduous and mixed forests with dormant season leaf loss. We propose that there is an optimal, intermediate zone along a gradient of dormant season canopy cover (DSCC; the proportion of the ground area covered by the canopy during the dormant season), where peak snowpack depth and the potential for snow refugia will be greatest because the canopy-mediated effects of snowpack sheltering (which can preserve snowpack) outweigh those of snowfall interception (which can limit snowpack). As an initial test of our hypothesis, we leveraged snowpack measurements in the northeastern United States spanning the DSCC gradient (low, <25% DSCC; medium, 25%–50% DSCC; and high, >50% DSCC), including from 2 sites in Old Town, Maine; 12 sites in Acadia National Park, Maine; and 30 sites in the northern White Mountains of New Hampshire. Medium DSCC forests (typically mature mixed coniferous–deciduous forests) exhibited the deepest peak snowpacks, likely due to reduced snowfall interception compared to high DSCC forests and reduced snowpack loss compared to low DSCC forests. Many snow accumulation or snowpack studies focus on the contrast between coniferous and open sites, but our results indicate a need for enhanced focus on mixed canopy sites that could serve as snow refugia. Measurements of snowpack depth and timing across a wider range of forest canopies would advance understanding of canopy–snow interactions, expand the monitoring of changing winters, and support management of forests and snow-dependent species in the face of climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信