质性研究中的深思抽样:卫生专业教育的严谨性标志

IF 1.2 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Clinical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1111/tct.70145
Jerusalem Merkebu, Jamie Geringer, Anita Samuel
{"title":"质性研究中的深思抽样:卫生专业教育的严谨性标志","authors":"Jerusalem Merkebu,&nbsp;Jamie Geringer,&nbsp;Anita Samuel","doi":"10.1111/tct.70145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Methodologically sound sampling is fundamental to the rigour and impact of qualitative medical education research, directly shaping the depth and breadth of resulting insights. Recognizing the significant influence of sampling decisions on research outcomes, this paper offers a practical guide for researchers navigating these crucial choices. We begin by delineating commonly employed qualitative sampling strategies, critically examining their respective strengths and inherent limitations. Subsequently, we emphasize the iterative nature of sampling, highlighting its continuous relevance throughout the research lifecycle, from initial participant recruitment to the nuanced stages of data analysis and interpretation. By providing pragmatic insights into these essential facets of qualitative sampling, this paper aims to empower researchers to make critical decisions, ultimately bolstering the quality, credibility and trustworthiness of their qualitative medical education research endeavours.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sampling Thoughtfully in Qualitative Research: Hallmarks of Rigour in Health Professions Education\",\"authors\":\"Jerusalem Merkebu,&nbsp;Jamie Geringer,&nbsp;Anita Samuel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Methodologically sound sampling is fundamental to the rigour and impact of qualitative medical education research, directly shaping the depth and breadth of resulting insights. Recognizing the significant influence of sampling decisions on research outcomes, this paper offers a practical guide for researchers navigating these crucial choices. We begin by delineating commonly employed qualitative sampling strategies, critically examining their respective strengths and inherent limitations. Subsequently, we emphasize the iterative nature of sampling, highlighting its continuous relevance throughout the research lifecycle, from initial participant recruitment to the nuanced stages of data analysis and interpretation. By providing pragmatic insights into these essential facets of qualitative sampling, this paper aims to empower researchers to make critical decisions, ultimately bolstering the quality, credibility and trustworthiness of their qualitative medical education research endeavours.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法上合理的抽样是严谨和定性医学教育研究的影响的基础,直接塑造了由此产生的见解的深度和广度。认识到抽样决策对研究成果的重大影响,本文为研究人员导航这些关键选择提供了实用指南。我们首先描述常用的定性抽样策略,严格检查各自的优势和固有的局限性。随后,我们强调采样的迭代性质,强调其在整个研究生命周期中的持续相关性,从最初的参与者招募到数据分析和解释的微妙阶段。通过对定性抽样的这些重要方面提供实用的见解,本文旨在使研究人员能够做出关键决策,最终提高其定性医学教育研究工作的质量、可信度和可信赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sampling Thoughtfully in Qualitative Research: Hallmarks of Rigour in Health Professions Education

Sampling Thoughtfully in Qualitative Research: Hallmarks of Rigour in Health Professions Education

Sampling Thoughtfully in Qualitative Research: Hallmarks of Rigour in Health Professions Education

Sampling Thoughtfully in Qualitative Research: Hallmarks of Rigour in Health Professions Education

Methodologically sound sampling is fundamental to the rigour and impact of qualitative medical education research, directly shaping the depth and breadth of resulting insights. Recognizing the significant influence of sampling decisions on research outcomes, this paper offers a practical guide for researchers navigating these crucial choices. We begin by delineating commonly employed qualitative sampling strategies, critically examining their respective strengths and inherent limitations. Subsequently, we emphasize the iterative nature of sampling, highlighting its continuous relevance throughout the research lifecycle, from initial participant recruitment to the nuanced stages of data analysis and interpretation. By providing pragmatic insights into these essential facets of qualitative sampling, this paper aims to empower researchers to make critical decisions, ultimately bolstering the quality, credibility and trustworthiness of their qualitative medical education research endeavours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Teacher
Clinical Teacher MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信