人体暴露于毫米波车辆雷达辐射的合格评定

IF 6.9 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Ryota Morimoto;Sachiko Kodera;Yuma Kobayashi;Keishi Miwa;Akimasa Hirata
{"title":"人体暴露于毫米波车辆雷达辐射的合格评定","authors":"Ryota Morimoto;Sachiko Kodera;Yuma Kobayashi;Keishi Miwa;Akimasa Hirata","doi":"10.1109/JMW.2025.3580722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The widespread adoption of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) has increased the use of millimeter-wave (mmWave) radars in vehicles, raising concerns about potential electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure for pedestrians. International guidelines for human exposure have introduced absorbed power density (APD) and incident power density (IPD) as physical quantities for evaluating local exposure above 6 GHz. However, pedestrian exposure to automotive radars has been insufficiently investigated, particularly in vehicle–pedestrian interactions with radar operating while stationary. This study employed computational simulations and experimental measurements to evaluate the exposure from a 12 × 1 patch antenna array operating at 79 GHz. Exposure scenarios were analyzed using simplified geometric models and anatomically realistic human models at varying distances and equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) levels. The results demonstrate a good agreement between the simulated and measured electric field distributions in both the near- and far-field regions. For continuous exposure, APD values obtained from anatomical models were consistently lower than those obtained from simplified geometries. At EIRPs of 26.7 dBm and 35.4 dBm, both APD and IPD remain within permissible limits across all distances. In contrast, the exposure at higher power levels (e.g., 55 dBm EIRP) exceeded the APD threshold. Nevertheless, evaluation using absorbed energy density, a metric for brief exposures, indicated compliance even when the human model was positioned directly adjacent to the vehicle surface. These findings provide critical insights into ensuring the conformity and design of next-generation automotive radar development.","PeriodicalId":93296,"journal":{"name":"IEEE journal of microwaves","volume":"5 4","pages":"793-803"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11075574","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conformity Assessment of Human Exposed to Radiation From Millimeter-Wave Vehicles Radars\",\"authors\":\"Ryota Morimoto;Sachiko Kodera;Yuma Kobayashi;Keishi Miwa;Akimasa Hirata\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JMW.2025.3580722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The widespread adoption of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) has increased the use of millimeter-wave (mmWave) radars in vehicles, raising concerns about potential electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure for pedestrians. International guidelines for human exposure have introduced absorbed power density (APD) and incident power density (IPD) as physical quantities for evaluating local exposure above 6 GHz. However, pedestrian exposure to automotive radars has been insufficiently investigated, particularly in vehicle–pedestrian interactions with radar operating while stationary. This study employed computational simulations and experimental measurements to evaluate the exposure from a 12 × 1 patch antenna array operating at 79 GHz. Exposure scenarios were analyzed using simplified geometric models and anatomically realistic human models at varying distances and equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) levels. The results demonstrate a good agreement between the simulated and measured electric field distributions in both the near- and far-field regions. For continuous exposure, APD values obtained from anatomical models were consistently lower than those obtained from simplified geometries. At EIRPs of 26.7 dBm and 35.4 dBm, both APD and IPD remain within permissible limits across all distances. In contrast, the exposure at higher power levels (e.g., 55 dBm EIRP) exceeded the APD threshold. Nevertheless, evaluation using absorbed energy density, a metric for brief exposures, indicated compliance even when the human model was positioned directly adjacent to the vehicle surface. These findings provide critical insights into ensuring the conformity and design of next-generation automotive radar development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE journal of microwaves\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"793-803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11075574\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE journal of microwaves\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11075574/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE journal of microwaves","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11075574/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先进驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)的广泛采用增加了车辆中毫米波(mmWave)雷达的使用,引起了人们对行人潜在电磁场(EMF)暴露的担忧。人体照射国际准则已将吸收功率密度(APD)和入射功率密度(IPD)作为评估6 GHz以上局部照射的物理量。然而,行人暴露在汽车雷达下的研究还不够充分,特别是在静止时雷达工作时车辆与行人的相互作用。本研究采用计算模拟和实验测量来评估工作在79 GHz的12 × 1贴片天线阵列的暴露。使用简化的几何模型和解剖学上真实的人体模型分析不同距离和等效各向同性辐射功率(EIRP)水平下的暴露情景。结果表明,在近场和远场区域,模拟的电场分布与实测的电场分布具有很好的一致性。对于连续暴露,解剖模型获得的APD值始终低于简化几何模型获得的APD值。在26.7 dBm和35.4 dBm的eirp下,APD和IPD在所有距离上都保持在允许的范围内。相比之下,在较高的功率水平(例如,55 dBm EIRP)下的暴露超过了APD阈值。然而,使用吸收能量密度(一种短暂暴露的度量)进行的评估表明,即使人体模型直接靠近车辆表面,也符合要求。这些发现为确保下一代汽车雷达的一致性和设计提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conformity Assessment of Human Exposed to Radiation From Millimeter-Wave Vehicles Radars
The widespread adoption of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) has increased the use of millimeter-wave (mmWave) radars in vehicles, raising concerns about potential electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure for pedestrians. International guidelines for human exposure have introduced absorbed power density (APD) and incident power density (IPD) as physical quantities for evaluating local exposure above 6 GHz. However, pedestrian exposure to automotive radars has been insufficiently investigated, particularly in vehicle–pedestrian interactions with radar operating while stationary. This study employed computational simulations and experimental measurements to evaluate the exposure from a 12 × 1 patch antenna array operating at 79 GHz. Exposure scenarios were analyzed using simplified geometric models and anatomically realistic human models at varying distances and equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) levels. The results demonstrate a good agreement between the simulated and measured electric field distributions in both the near- and far-field regions. For continuous exposure, APD values obtained from anatomical models were consistently lower than those obtained from simplified geometries. At EIRPs of 26.7 dBm and 35.4 dBm, both APD and IPD remain within permissible limits across all distances. In contrast, the exposure at higher power levels (e.g., 55 dBm EIRP) exceeded the APD threshold. Nevertheless, evaluation using absorbed energy density, a metric for brief exposures, indicated compliance even when the human model was positioned directly adjacent to the vehicle surface. These findings provide critical insights into ensuring the conformity and design of next-generation automotive radar development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信