利用非洲乳母(Calophyllaceae)和蛇舌菌(sapotacae)的氢乙醇提取物增强四环素、头孢他啶和阿莫西林对临床相关耐药肠道细菌的疗效

Armel Jackson Seukep , Bobga Francine Mbu , Helene Gueaba Mbuntcha , Valaire Yemene Matieta , Eleonore Ngounou , Arnaud Fondjo Kouam , Victor Kuete , Benjamin D. Thumamo Pokam
{"title":"利用非洲乳母(Calophyllaceae)和蛇舌菌(sapotacae)的氢乙醇提取物增强四环素、头孢他啶和阿莫西林对临床相关耐药肠道细菌的疗效","authors":"Armel Jackson Seukep ,&nbsp;Bobga Francine Mbu ,&nbsp;Helene Gueaba Mbuntcha ,&nbsp;Valaire Yemene Matieta ,&nbsp;Eleonore Ngounou ,&nbsp;Arnaud Fondjo Kouam ,&nbsp;Victor Kuete ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Thumamo Pokam","doi":"10.1016/j.prenap.2025.100311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Medicinal plants are essential in our battle against drug-resistant bacteria, serving as rich sources of antibacterial agents and modifiers of antibiotic resistance. This study examined the antibacterial efficacy of hydroethanolic extracts from the leaves of <em>Mammea africana</em> (MA) and <em>Baillonella toxisperma</em> (BT) and their interactions with tetracycline, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin on a panel of clinically relevant bacterial strains and clinical isolates of <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Salmonella sp.</em>, <em>Shigella sp.</em>, <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>, and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. Broth microdilution was used for antibacterial testing, while the checkerboard assay was employed to study interactions. The qualitative phytochemical analysis adhered to established protocols. Both extracts exhibited noteworthy antibacterial activity, with MICs ranging from 8 to 1024 µg/mL. MA was the most potent, demonstrating MICs &lt; 100 µg/mL against six pathogens, including impressively low MICs (&lt;10 µg/mL) for <em>S. aureus</em> and <em>S. enteritidis</em>, exceeding those of the reference antibiotic (tetracycline). MA also showed bactericidal effects against most drug-resistant strains tested. The combination revealed significant synergistic (fractional inhibitory concentrations, FICi = 0.281–0.5) and additive effects (FICi = 0.625–1), reducing the antibiotic MICs by 2–32-fold. Both extracts worked synergistically with amoxicillin against <em>S. typhi</em> ST-RHB. Additionally, MA demonstrated synergy with all antibiotics on <em>S. aureus</em> SA-RHB. Notably, no antagonistic effects were observed. The primary phytochemicals identified in the extracts included phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, anthocyanins, terpenoids, and saponins, all known for their antibacterial properties. The findings support the traditional use of these plants and the practice of complementing herbal preparations with conventional antibiotics. Further research is needed to identify the bioactive components and evaluate their safety and mechanisms of action.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101014,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacological Research - Natural Products","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing tetracycline, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin efficacy with hydroethanolic extracts of Mammea africana (Calophyllaceae) and Baillonella toxisperma (Sapotaceae) against clinically relevant drug-resistant enteric bacteria\",\"authors\":\"Armel Jackson Seukep ,&nbsp;Bobga Francine Mbu ,&nbsp;Helene Gueaba Mbuntcha ,&nbsp;Valaire Yemene Matieta ,&nbsp;Eleonore Ngounou ,&nbsp;Arnaud Fondjo Kouam ,&nbsp;Victor Kuete ,&nbsp;Benjamin D. Thumamo Pokam\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prenap.2025.100311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Medicinal plants are essential in our battle against drug-resistant bacteria, serving as rich sources of antibacterial agents and modifiers of antibiotic resistance. This study examined the antibacterial efficacy of hydroethanolic extracts from the leaves of <em>Mammea africana</em> (MA) and <em>Baillonella toxisperma</em> (BT) and their interactions with tetracycline, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin on a panel of clinically relevant bacterial strains and clinical isolates of <em>Escherichia coli</em>, <em>Salmonella sp.</em>, <em>Shigella sp.</em>, <em>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</em>, and <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em>. Broth microdilution was used for antibacterial testing, while the checkerboard assay was employed to study interactions. The qualitative phytochemical analysis adhered to established protocols. Both extracts exhibited noteworthy antibacterial activity, with MICs ranging from 8 to 1024 µg/mL. MA was the most potent, demonstrating MICs &lt; 100 µg/mL against six pathogens, including impressively low MICs (&lt;10 µg/mL) for <em>S. aureus</em> and <em>S. enteritidis</em>, exceeding those of the reference antibiotic (tetracycline). MA also showed bactericidal effects against most drug-resistant strains tested. The combination revealed significant synergistic (fractional inhibitory concentrations, FICi = 0.281–0.5) and additive effects (FICi = 0.625–1), reducing the antibiotic MICs by 2–32-fold. Both extracts worked synergistically with amoxicillin against <em>S. typhi</em> ST-RHB. Additionally, MA demonstrated synergy with all antibiotics on <em>S. aureus</em> SA-RHB. Notably, no antagonistic effects were observed. The primary phytochemicals identified in the extracts included phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, anthocyanins, terpenoids, and saponins, all known for their antibacterial properties. The findings support the traditional use of these plants and the practice of complementing herbal preparations with conventional antibiotics. Further research is needed to identify the bioactive components and evaluate their safety and mechanisms of action.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacological Research - Natural Products\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacological Research - Natural Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950199725001715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacological Research - Natural Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950199725001715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

药用植物在我们与耐药细菌的斗争中是必不可少的,它们是抗菌剂和抗生素耐药性调节剂的丰富来源。本研究考察了非洲乳Mammea africana (MA)和毒尾巴隆菌(Baillonella toxisperma, BT)叶中氢乙醇提取物的抗菌效果,以及它们与四环素、头孢他啶和阿莫西林对临床相关菌株和临床分离的大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌、志贺氏菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的相互作用。采用微量肉汤稀释法进行抑菌试验,棋盘法研究相互作用。定性植物化学分析遵循既定方案。两种提取物均表现出明显的抗菌活性,mic范围为8 ~ 1024 µg/mL。MA是最有效的,对六种病原体的mic值为<; 100 µg/mL,包括对金黄色葡萄球菌和肠炎沙门氏菌的mic值极低(<10 µg/mL),超过了参考抗生素(四环素)。MA还显示出对大多数耐药菌株的杀菌作用。联合用药显示出显著的协同效应(分数抑制浓度,FICi = 0.281-0.5)和加性效应(FICi = 0.625-1),使抗生素mic降低2- 32倍。两种提取物均与阿莫西林协同抗伤寒沙门氏菌ST-RHB。此外,MA与所有抗生素对金黄色葡萄球菌SA-RHB具有协同作用。值得注意的是,未观察到拮抗作用。在提取物中发现的主要植物化学物质包括酚类、类黄酮、生物碱、单宁、花青素、萜类和皂苷,它们都以抗菌特性而闻名。这些发现支持这些植物的传统使用,以及用常规抗生素补充草药制剂的做法。需要进一步的研究来确定其生物活性成分并评估其安全性和作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing tetracycline, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin efficacy with hydroethanolic extracts of Mammea africana (Calophyllaceae) and Baillonella toxisperma (Sapotaceae) against clinically relevant drug-resistant enteric bacteria
Medicinal plants are essential in our battle against drug-resistant bacteria, serving as rich sources of antibacterial agents and modifiers of antibiotic resistance. This study examined the antibacterial efficacy of hydroethanolic extracts from the leaves of Mammea africana (MA) and Baillonella toxisperma (BT) and their interactions with tetracycline, ceftazidime, and amoxicillin on a panel of clinically relevant bacterial strains and clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus. Broth microdilution was used for antibacterial testing, while the checkerboard assay was employed to study interactions. The qualitative phytochemical analysis adhered to established protocols. Both extracts exhibited noteworthy antibacterial activity, with MICs ranging from 8 to 1024 µg/mL. MA was the most potent, demonstrating MICs < 100 µg/mL against six pathogens, including impressively low MICs (<10 µg/mL) for S. aureus and S. enteritidis, exceeding those of the reference antibiotic (tetracycline). MA also showed bactericidal effects against most drug-resistant strains tested. The combination revealed significant synergistic (fractional inhibitory concentrations, FICi = 0.281–0.5) and additive effects (FICi = 0.625–1), reducing the antibiotic MICs by 2–32-fold. Both extracts worked synergistically with amoxicillin against S. typhi ST-RHB. Additionally, MA demonstrated synergy with all antibiotics on S. aureus SA-RHB. Notably, no antagonistic effects were observed. The primary phytochemicals identified in the extracts included phenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, anthocyanins, terpenoids, and saponins, all known for their antibacterial properties. The findings support the traditional use of these plants and the practice of complementing herbal preparations with conventional antibiotics. Further research is needed to identify the bioactive components and evaluate their safety and mechanisms of action.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信