Rodrigo Mora , Tomás Cox , Ricardo Hurtubia , Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke
{"title":"骑自行车者与其他道路使用者之间的小规模冲突:年龄、性别和街道使用影响","authors":"Rodrigo Mora , Tomás Cox , Ricardo Hurtubia , Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and users of other modes of transport are usually underreported, although very relevant for the cycling experience. Despite a growing literature in this field, little attention has been given to the systematic analysis of such conflicts. This paper examines the relationship between cyclists’ characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and the modes of transport with which cyclists have small-scale conflicts, through data obtained from a survey to 576 cyclists in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using an Ordered Logit Model, the frequency of conflicts with different modes of transport is analysed, incorporating socio-demographic variables to explore differences across gender and age groups, including interactions with respondents’ usual routes. In line with previous research, findings indicate that these conflicts are frequent, therefore adversely impacting people's experience of cycling. Notably, cars are identified as the most frequent sources of conflict, with taxis specifically emerging as significant contributors (despite their lower numbers). Socio-demographic factors further influence these conflicts; older cyclists report more frequent conflicts with pedestrians and cyclists, while young men encounter more issues with motorised vehicles, although these interactions vary depending on the type of infrastructure more frequently used (cyclepaths, sidewalks, mains roads, etc.). These findings underscore the need for adequate cycling infrastructure and public policies to promote safer, more inclusive cycling environments, especially for women and older people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104597"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and other road users: Age, gender and street use effects\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Mora , Tomás Cox , Ricardo Hurtubia , Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and users of other modes of transport are usually underreported, although very relevant for the cycling experience. Despite a growing literature in this field, little attention has been given to the systematic analysis of such conflicts. This paper examines the relationship between cyclists’ characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and the modes of transport with which cyclists have small-scale conflicts, through data obtained from a survey to 576 cyclists in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using an Ordered Logit Model, the frequency of conflicts with different modes of transport is analysed, incorporating socio-demographic variables to explore differences across gender and age groups, including interactions with respondents’ usual routes. In line with previous research, findings indicate that these conflicts are frequent, therefore adversely impacting people's experience of cycling. Notably, cars are identified as the most frequent sources of conflict, with taxis specifically emerging as significant contributors (despite their lower numbers). Socio-demographic factors further influence these conflicts; older cyclists report more frequent conflicts with pedestrians and cyclists, while young men encounter more issues with motorised vehicles, although these interactions vary depending on the type of infrastructure more frequently used (cyclepaths, sidewalks, mains roads, etc.). These findings underscore the need for adequate cycling infrastructure and public policies to promote safer, more inclusive cycling environments, especially for women and older people.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and other road users: Age, gender and street use effects
Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and users of other modes of transport are usually underreported, although very relevant for the cycling experience. Despite a growing literature in this field, little attention has been given to the systematic analysis of such conflicts. This paper examines the relationship between cyclists’ characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and the modes of transport with which cyclists have small-scale conflicts, through data obtained from a survey to 576 cyclists in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using an Ordered Logit Model, the frequency of conflicts with different modes of transport is analysed, incorporating socio-demographic variables to explore differences across gender and age groups, including interactions with respondents’ usual routes. In line with previous research, findings indicate that these conflicts are frequent, therefore adversely impacting people's experience of cycling. Notably, cars are identified as the most frequent sources of conflict, with taxis specifically emerging as significant contributors (despite their lower numbers). Socio-demographic factors further influence these conflicts; older cyclists report more frequent conflicts with pedestrians and cyclists, while young men encounter more issues with motorised vehicles, although these interactions vary depending on the type of infrastructure more frequently used (cyclepaths, sidewalks, mains roads, etc.). These findings underscore the need for adequate cycling infrastructure and public policies to promote safer, more inclusive cycling environments, especially for women and older people.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.