骑自行车者与其他道路使用者之间的小规模冲突:年龄、性别和街道使用影响

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rodrigo Mora , Tomás Cox , Ricardo Hurtubia , Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke
{"title":"骑自行车者与其他道路使用者之间的小规模冲突:年龄、性别和街道使用影响","authors":"Rodrigo Mora ,&nbsp;Tomás Cox ,&nbsp;Ricardo Hurtubia ,&nbsp;Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and users of other modes of transport are usually underreported, although very relevant for the cycling experience. Despite a growing literature in this field, little attention has been given to the systematic analysis of such conflicts. This paper examines the relationship between cyclists’ characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and the modes of transport with which cyclists have small-scale conflicts, through data obtained from a survey to 576 cyclists in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using an Ordered Logit Model, the frequency of conflicts with different modes of transport is analysed, incorporating socio-demographic variables to explore differences across gender and age groups, including interactions with respondents’ usual routes. In line with previous research, findings indicate that these conflicts are frequent, therefore adversely impacting people's experience of cycling. Notably, cars are identified as the most frequent sources of conflict, with taxis specifically emerging as significant contributors (despite their lower numbers). Socio-demographic factors further influence these conflicts; older cyclists report more frequent conflicts with pedestrians and cyclists, while young men encounter more issues with motorised vehicles, although these interactions vary depending on the type of infrastructure more frequently used (cyclepaths, sidewalks, mains roads, etc.). These findings underscore the need for adequate cycling infrastructure and public policies to promote safer, more inclusive cycling environments, especially for women and older people.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104597"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and other road users: Age, gender and street use effects\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Mora ,&nbsp;Tomás Cox ,&nbsp;Ricardo Hurtubia ,&nbsp;Marie Geraldine Herrmann-Lunecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and users of other modes of transport are usually underreported, although very relevant for the cycling experience. Despite a growing literature in this field, little attention has been given to the systematic analysis of such conflicts. This paper examines the relationship between cyclists’ characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and the modes of transport with which cyclists have small-scale conflicts, through data obtained from a survey to 576 cyclists in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using an Ordered Logit Model, the frequency of conflicts with different modes of transport is analysed, incorporating socio-demographic variables to explore differences across gender and age groups, including interactions with respondents’ usual routes. In line with previous research, findings indicate that these conflicts are frequent, therefore adversely impacting people's experience of cycling. Notably, cars are identified as the most frequent sources of conflict, with taxis specifically emerging as significant contributors (despite their lower numbers). Socio-demographic factors further influence these conflicts; older cyclists report more frequent conflicts with pedestrians and cyclists, while young men encounter more issues with motorised vehicles, although these interactions vary depending on the type of infrastructure more frequently used (cyclepaths, sidewalks, mains roads, etc.). These findings underscore the need for adequate cycling infrastructure and public policies to promote safer, more inclusive cycling environments, especially for women and older people.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骑车者和其他交通工具使用者之间的小规模冲突通常被低估了,尽管这与骑车体验非常相关。尽管这一领域的文献越来越多,但很少有人注意对这种冲突进行系统分析。本文通过对智利圣地亚哥市576名骑自行车者的调查数据,研究了骑自行车者的特征(如性别和年龄)与骑自行车者发生小规模冲突的交通方式之间的关系。使用有序Logit模型,分析了与不同交通方式的冲突频率,结合社会人口变量来探索性别和年龄组之间的差异,包括与受访者通常路线的互动。与之前的研究一致,研究结果表明,这些冲突经常发生,因此对人们的骑行体验产生了不利影响。值得注意的是,汽车被认为是最常见的冲突来源,尤其是出租车(尽管它们的数量较少)。社会人口因素进一步影响这些冲突;年长的骑自行车的人报告说,他们与行人和骑自行车的人发生冲突的频率更高,而年轻人则更多地遇到与机动车辆发生冲突的问题,尽管这些冲突取决于更频繁使用的基础设施类型(自行车道、人行道、主要道路等)。这些发现强调,需要有足够的自行车基础设施和公共政策,以促进更安全、更包容的自行车环境,特别是对妇女和老年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and other road users: Age, gender and street use effects
Small-scale conflicts between cyclists and users of other modes of transport are usually underreported, although very relevant for the cycling experience. Despite a growing literature in this field, little attention has been given to the systematic analysis of such conflicts. This paper examines the relationship between cyclists’ characteristics (e.g., gender and age) and the modes of transport with which cyclists have small-scale conflicts, through data obtained from a survey to 576 cyclists in the city of Santiago (Chile). Using an Ordered Logit Model, the frequency of conflicts with different modes of transport is analysed, incorporating socio-demographic variables to explore differences across gender and age groups, including interactions with respondents’ usual routes. In line with previous research, findings indicate that these conflicts are frequent, therefore adversely impacting people's experience of cycling. Notably, cars are identified as the most frequent sources of conflict, with taxis specifically emerging as significant contributors (despite their lower numbers). Socio-demographic factors further influence these conflicts; older cyclists report more frequent conflicts with pedestrians and cyclists, while young men encounter more issues with motorised vehicles, although these interactions vary depending on the type of infrastructure more frequently used (cyclepaths, sidewalks, mains roads, etc.). These findings underscore the need for adequate cycling infrastructure and public policies to promote safer, more inclusive cycling environments, especially for women and older people.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信