Chaoshi Liu , Yong Liu , Zhixiang Cheng , Yuxuan Li , Pengjie Liu , Lin Liu , Yuanyuan Min , Qiangling Duan , Wenxin Mei , Qingsong Wang
{"title":"安全阀排气压力对大规格磷酸铁锂电池热失控影响的实验研究","authors":"Chaoshi Liu , Yong Liu , Zhixiang Cheng , Yuxuan Li , Pengjie Liu , Lin Liu , Yuanyuan Min , Qiangling Duan , Wenxin Mei , Qingsong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal runaway (TR) of large-format lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries has become a critical technical issue due to its potential to cause extensive fire incidents. The safety valve (SV) plays an important role that it enables gases generated inside the battery to release promptly, thereby delaying the onset of TR (<em>T</em><sub>TR</sub>). However, the impact of the initial setting venting pressure of the safety valve (<em>P</em><sub>sv</sub>) on the TR behavior of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the severity of the associated hazards remain unclear. To address this, this study investigates the TR behavior and associated risks of LFP batteries with different <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> under thermal abuse conditions. The results indicate that LFP batteries without SV experience combustion during TR, significantly increasing the hazard. With increasing <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub>, the maximum temperature (<em>T</em><sub>max</sub>) and peak rate of temperature rise (d<em>T</em>/d<em>t</em>)<sub>max</sub> during TR decrease gradually. Finally, a TR assessment model is employed to evaluate the hazards of LFP batteries under different <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub>. Batteries without SV exhibit the highest TR hazards, whereas those with the <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> of 0.35 MPa demonstrated the lowest hazards. However, higher <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> results in the accumulation of higher peak pressures inside the battery, thereby increasing the risk of severe safety incidents. Therefore, the selection of the appropriate <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> requires careful consideration of the battery's operational specifications and safety standards to achieve an optimal balance. This results can provide a more comprehensive theoretical and experimental basis for battery design and safety assessment by comparing battery responses under different <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20743,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 107563"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on the impact of safety valve venting pressure on thermal runaway in large-format lithium iron phosphate battery\",\"authors\":\"Chaoshi Liu , Yong Liu , Zhixiang Cheng , Yuxuan Li , Pengjie Liu , Lin Liu , Yuanyuan Min , Qiangling Duan , Wenxin Mei , Qingsong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psep.2025.107563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Thermal runaway (TR) of large-format lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries has become a critical technical issue due to its potential to cause extensive fire incidents. The safety valve (SV) plays an important role that it enables gases generated inside the battery to release promptly, thereby delaying the onset of TR (<em>T</em><sub>TR</sub>). However, the impact of the initial setting venting pressure of the safety valve (<em>P</em><sub>sv</sub>) on the TR behavior of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the severity of the associated hazards remain unclear. To address this, this study investigates the TR behavior and associated risks of LFP batteries with different <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> under thermal abuse conditions. The results indicate that LFP batteries without SV experience combustion during TR, significantly increasing the hazard. With increasing <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub>, the maximum temperature (<em>T</em><sub>max</sub>) and peak rate of temperature rise (d<em>T</em>/d<em>t</em>)<sub>max</sub> during TR decrease gradually. Finally, a TR assessment model is employed to evaluate the hazards of LFP batteries under different <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub>. Batteries without SV exhibit the highest TR hazards, whereas those with the <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> of 0.35 MPa demonstrated the lowest hazards. However, higher <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> results in the accumulation of higher peak pressures inside the battery, thereby increasing the risk of severe safety incidents. Therefore, the selection of the appropriate <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> requires careful consideration of the battery's operational specifications and safety standards to achieve an optimal balance. This results can provide a more comprehensive theoretical and experimental basis for battery design and safety assessment by comparing battery responses under different <em>P</em><sub>sv</sub> conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"201 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Process Safety and Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025008304\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety and Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957582025008304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental study on the impact of safety valve venting pressure on thermal runaway in large-format lithium iron phosphate battery
Thermal runaway (TR) of large-format lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries has become a critical technical issue due to its potential to cause extensive fire incidents. The safety valve (SV) plays an important role that it enables gases generated inside the battery to release promptly, thereby delaying the onset of TR (TTR). However, the impact of the initial setting venting pressure of the safety valve (Psv) on the TR behavior of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and the severity of the associated hazards remain unclear. To address this, this study investigates the TR behavior and associated risks of LFP batteries with different Psv under thermal abuse conditions. The results indicate that LFP batteries without SV experience combustion during TR, significantly increasing the hazard. With increasing Psv, the maximum temperature (Tmax) and peak rate of temperature rise (dT/dt)max during TR decrease gradually. Finally, a TR assessment model is employed to evaluate the hazards of LFP batteries under different Psv. Batteries without SV exhibit the highest TR hazards, whereas those with the Psv of 0.35 MPa demonstrated the lowest hazards. However, higher Psv results in the accumulation of higher peak pressures inside the battery, thereby increasing the risk of severe safety incidents. Therefore, the selection of the appropriate Psv requires careful consideration of the battery's operational specifications and safety standards to achieve an optimal balance. This results can provide a more comprehensive theoretical and experimental basis for battery design and safety assessment by comparing battery responses under different Psv conditions.
期刊介绍:
The Process Safety and Environmental Protection (PSEP) journal is a leading international publication that focuses on the publication of high-quality, original research papers in the field of engineering, specifically those related to the safety of industrial processes and environmental protection. The journal encourages submissions that present new developments in safety and environmental aspects, particularly those that show how research findings can be applied in process engineering design and practice.
PSEP is particularly interested in research that brings fresh perspectives to established engineering principles, identifies unsolved problems, or suggests directions for future research. The journal also values contributions that push the boundaries of traditional engineering and welcomes multidisciplinary papers.
PSEP's articles are abstracted and indexed by a range of databases and services, which helps to ensure that the journal's research is accessible and recognized in the academic and professional communities. These databases include ANTE, Chemical Abstracts, Chemical Hazards in Industry, Current Contents, Elsevier Engineering Information database, Pascal Francis, Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Information Database EnCompass LIT (Elsevier), and INSPEC. This wide coverage facilitates the dissemination of the journal's content to a global audience interested in process safety and environmental engineering.