中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和中性粒细胞活化与新生血管性AMD治疗反应的关系

Alexander Kai Thomsen , Maria Abildgaard Steffensen , Kathrine Gotfredsen , Henrik Vorum , Bent Honoré , Mogens Holst Nissen , Torben Lykke Sørensen
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和中性粒细胞活化与新生血管性AMD治疗反应的关系","authors":"Alexander Kai Thomsen ,&nbsp;Maria Abildgaard Steffensen ,&nbsp;Kathrine Gotfredsen ,&nbsp;Henrik Vorum ,&nbsp;Bent Honoré ,&nbsp;Mogens Holst Nissen ,&nbsp;Torben Lykke Sørensen","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and alterations of activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils have been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between NLR, activation surface markers on neutrophils, AMD stage, and treatment response in neovascular AMD (nAMD).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Treatment-naïve nAMD patients, intermediate AMD (iAMD) patients, and healthy controls were consecutively enrolled. Treatment response in nAMD patients was categorized as good, partial and poor based on change of retinal fluid and central retinal thickness. Treatment response was evaluated after the loading phase and after one year of treatment with aflibercept 2 mg. NLR and activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils (CD11a, CD11b, CD31, CD66b, CD162, and CD182) were examined with flow cytometry. NLR and activation surface markers were compared between healthy controls, iAMD, and nAMD patients, as well as between nAMD treatment response groups. Polymorphisms in the CFH and ARMS2 genes were compared to NLR and the surface markers in nAMD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NLR was significantly elevated in nAMD patients compared to healthy controls (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). nAMD patients with poor 1-year treatment response had a significantly higher NLR compared to good 1-year treatment responders. Expression levels of CD11a, CD11b, CD31, CD66b, CD162, and CD182 on circulating neutrophils were elevated in nAMD patients compared to healthy controls (all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), however no significant differences were found between nAMD treatment response groups. No significant associations were found between CFH or ARMS2 genotypes with NLR or neutrophil surface markers in nAMD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Elevated NLR was associated with a poor 1-year treatment response. The NLR and expression levels of activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils were significantly elevated in treatment-naïve nAMD patients compared to healthy controls.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil activation with treatment response in neovascular AMD\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Kai Thomsen ,&nbsp;Maria Abildgaard Steffensen ,&nbsp;Kathrine Gotfredsen ,&nbsp;Henrik Vorum ,&nbsp;Bent Honoré ,&nbsp;Mogens Holst Nissen ,&nbsp;Torben Lykke Sørensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2025.100155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and alterations of activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils have been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between NLR, activation surface markers on neutrophils, AMD stage, and treatment response in neovascular AMD (nAMD).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Prospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Treatment-naïve nAMD patients, intermediate AMD (iAMD) patients, and healthy controls were consecutively enrolled. Treatment response in nAMD patients was categorized as good, partial and poor based on change of retinal fluid and central retinal thickness. Treatment response was evaluated after the loading phase and after one year of treatment with aflibercept 2 mg. NLR and activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils (CD11a, CD11b, CD31, CD66b, CD162, and CD182) were examined with flow cytometry. NLR and activation surface markers were compared between healthy controls, iAMD, and nAMD patients, as well as between nAMD treatment response groups. Polymorphisms in the CFH and ARMS2 genes were compared to NLR and the surface markers in nAMD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>NLR was significantly elevated in nAMD patients compared to healthy controls (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). nAMD patients with poor 1-year treatment response had a significantly higher NLR compared to good 1-year treatment responders. Expression levels of CD11a, CD11b, CD31, CD66b, CD162, and CD182 on circulating neutrophils were elevated in nAMD patients compared to healthy controls (all <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), however no significant differences were found between nAMD treatment response groups. No significant associations were found between CFH or ARMS2 genotypes with NLR or neutrophil surface markers in nAMD patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Elevated NLR was associated with a poor 1-year treatment response. The NLR and expression levels of activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils were significantly elevated in treatment-naïve nAMD patients compared to healthy controls.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253525000589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和循环中性粒细胞活化表面标记物的改变被认为参与了老年性黄斑变性(AMD)的发病机制。本研究的目的是探讨NLR、中性粒细胞活化表面标志物、AMD分期和新生血管性AMD (nAMD)治疗反应之间的关系。前瞻性队列研究。MethodsTreatment-naïve nAMD患者、中度AMD (iAMD)患者和健康对照者被连续入组。根据视网膜液和视网膜中央厚度的变化,将nAMD患者的治疗反应分为良好、部分和较差。在负荷期和阿伯西伯2mg治疗一年后评估治疗效果。流式细胞术检测循环中性粒细胞(CD11a、CD11b、CD31、CD66b、CD162和CD182)的NLR和活化表面标志物。比较健康对照、iAMD和nAMD患者以及nAMD治疗反应组之间NLR和活化表面标记物的差异。将CFH和ARMS2基因的多态性与NLR和nAMD患者的表面标记物进行比较。结果与健康对照组相比,nAMD患者的snlr显著升高(P <;0.001)。1年治疗反应较差的nAMD患者的NLR显著高于1年治疗反应良好的患者。与健康对照组相比,nAMD患者循环中性粒细胞中CD11a、CD11b、CD31、CD66b、CD162和CD182的表达水平升高(P <;0.05),但nAMD治疗反应组间无显著差异。在nAMD患者中,CFH或ARMS2基因型与NLR或中性粒细胞表面标志物之间未发现显著关联。结论NLR升高与1年治疗反应不良相关。与健康对照组相比,treatment-naïve nAMD患者的NLR和循环中性粒细胞活化表面标志物的表达水平显著升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil activation with treatment response in neovascular AMD

Purpose

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and alterations of activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils have been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between NLR, activation surface markers on neutrophils, AMD stage, and treatment response in neovascular AMD (nAMD).

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Methods

Treatment-naïve nAMD patients, intermediate AMD (iAMD) patients, and healthy controls were consecutively enrolled. Treatment response in nAMD patients was categorized as good, partial and poor based on change of retinal fluid and central retinal thickness. Treatment response was evaluated after the loading phase and after one year of treatment with aflibercept 2 mg. NLR and activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils (CD11a, CD11b, CD31, CD66b, CD162, and CD182) were examined with flow cytometry. NLR and activation surface markers were compared between healthy controls, iAMD, and nAMD patients, as well as between nAMD treatment response groups. Polymorphisms in the CFH and ARMS2 genes were compared to NLR and the surface markers in nAMD patients.

Results

NLR was significantly elevated in nAMD patients compared to healthy controls (P < 0.001). nAMD patients with poor 1-year treatment response had a significantly higher NLR compared to good 1-year treatment responders. Expression levels of CD11a, CD11b, CD31, CD66b, CD162, and CD182 on circulating neutrophils were elevated in nAMD patients compared to healthy controls (all P < 0.05), however no significant differences were found between nAMD treatment response groups. No significant associations were found between CFH or ARMS2 genotypes with NLR or neutrophil surface markers in nAMD patients.

Conclusion

Elevated NLR was associated with a poor 1-year treatment response. The NLR and expression levels of activation surface markers on circulating neutrophils were significantly elevated in treatment-naïve nAMD patients compared to healthy controls.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信