Jessica A. Suarez, Christopher W. Hagen, Angela Adame, Mauricio R. Papini
{"title":"广泛训练后的挫败性无奖励完成性连续负性对比任务","authors":"Jessica A. Suarez, Christopher W. Hagen, Angela Adame, Mauricio R. Papini","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) task, animals typically receive 10 sessions of access to 32 % sucrose followed by 4 sessions of access to 4 % sucrose. Such downshift yields a transient suppression of consummatory behavior relative to unshifted controls always exposed to 4 % sucrose. Previous research shows that a 16-to-4 % sucrose disparity rarely, if ever, yields evidence of cSNC. We explored the possibility that cSNC would emerge with an extended number of preshift sessions (overtraining, OT: 30 sessions), compared to the typical procedure (regular training, RT: 10 sessions). OT was expected to increase reward expectancy thus enhancing the effects of the downshift on consummatory suppression and perhaps revealing an cSNC effect with a reward disparity that usually does not produce such an effect. This experiment also tested whether OT converts licking into a habitual response, failing to respond to reward downshift. Five groups were included: 32-4/OT, 32-4/RT, 16-4/OT, 16-4/RT, and 4-4. A stronger cSNC effect was observed in Group 32-4/OT relative to 32-4/RT. No evidence of cSNC was observed in the 16-to-4 % sucrose downshifts, whether in OT or RT. Analysis of individual differences in downshift performance provided no evidence of cSNC in the 16-to-4 % sucrose groups, but significant cSNC effects in the 32-to-4 % sucrose groups. A manipulation leading to a stronger cSNC effect (i.e., OT) still failed to yield the effect with a suboptimal reward disparity. Moreover, there was no evidence suggesting that OT switched licking into a habitual behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frustrative nonreward after extensive training in the consummatory successive negative contrast task\",\"authors\":\"Jessica A. Suarez, Christopher W. Hagen, Angela Adame, Mauricio R. Papini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) task, animals typically receive 10 sessions of access to 32 % sucrose followed by 4 sessions of access to 4 % sucrose. Such downshift yields a transient suppression of consummatory behavior relative to unshifted controls always exposed to 4 % sucrose. Previous research shows that a 16-to-4 % sucrose disparity rarely, if ever, yields evidence of cSNC. We explored the possibility that cSNC would emerge with an extended number of preshift sessions (overtraining, OT: 30 sessions), compared to the typical procedure (regular training, RT: 10 sessions). OT was expected to increase reward expectancy thus enhancing the effects of the downshift on consummatory suppression and perhaps revealing an cSNC effect with a reward disparity that usually does not produce such an effect. This experiment also tested whether OT converts licking into a habitual response, failing to respond to reward downshift. Five groups were included: 32-4/OT, 32-4/RT, 16-4/OT, 16-4/RT, and 4-4. A stronger cSNC effect was observed in Group 32-4/OT relative to 32-4/RT. No evidence of cSNC was observed in the 16-to-4 % sucrose downshifts, whether in OT or RT. Analysis of individual differences in downshift performance provided no evidence of cSNC in the 16-to-4 % sucrose groups, but significant cSNC effects in the 32-to-4 % sucrose groups. A manipulation leading to a stronger cSNC effect (i.e., OT) still failed to yield the effect with a suboptimal reward disparity. Moreover, there was no evidence suggesting that OT switched licking into a habitual behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"volume\":\"91 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Motivation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025000694\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025000694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frustrative nonreward after extensive training in the consummatory successive negative contrast task
In the consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) task, animals typically receive 10 sessions of access to 32 % sucrose followed by 4 sessions of access to 4 % sucrose. Such downshift yields a transient suppression of consummatory behavior relative to unshifted controls always exposed to 4 % sucrose. Previous research shows that a 16-to-4 % sucrose disparity rarely, if ever, yields evidence of cSNC. We explored the possibility that cSNC would emerge with an extended number of preshift sessions (overtraining, OT: 30 sessions), compared to the typical procedure (regular training, RT: 10 sessions). OT was expected to increase reward expectancy thus enhancing the effects of the downshift on consummatory suppression and perhaps revealing an cSNC effect with a reward disparity that usually does not produce such an effect. This experiment also tested whether OT converts licking into a habitual response, failing to respond to reward downshift. Five groups were included: 32-4/OT, 32-4/RT, 16-4/OT, 16-4/RT, and 4-4. A stronger cSNC effect was observed in Group 32-4/OT relative to 32-4/RT. No evidence of cSNC was observed in the 16-to-4 % sucrose downshifts, whether in OT or RT. Analysis of individual differences in downshift performance provided no evidence of cSNC in the 16-to-4 % sucrose groups, but significant cSNC effects in the 32-to-4 % sucrose groups. A manipulation leading to a stronger cSNC effect (i.e., OT) still failed to yield the effect with a suboptimal reward disparity. Moreover, there was no evidence suggesting that OT switched licking into a habitual behavior.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.