非霍奇金淋巴瘤CD19 CAR - T治疗前桥接放疗的安全性和有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Mohammad Alhomoud,Rahma Ibrahim,Michelle Demetres,Kai Rejeski,Michael Scordo,Roni Shouval,Tobias Tix,Jeremie Martinet,Michelle Foley,Alexandra Gomez-Arteaga,Tsiporah Shore,Paul Pagnini,Mahmoud Aljurf,Monica L Guzman,Silvia Formenti,Joachim Yahalom,Koen Van Besien,Brandon S Imber,Zhengming Chen,Samuel Yamshon
{"title":"非霍奇金淋巴瘤CD19 CAR - T治疗前桥接放疗的安全性和有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Mohammad Alhomoud,Rahma Ibrahim,Michelle Demetres,Kai Rejeski,Michael Scordo,Roni Shouval,Tobias Tix,Jeremie Martinet,Michelle Foley,Alexandra Gomez-Arteaga,Tsiporah Shore,Paul Pagnini,Mahmoud Aljurf,Monica L Guzman,Silvia Formenti,Joachim Yahalom,Koen Van Besien,Brandon S Imber,Zhengming Chen,Samuel Yamshon","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2025.287547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is increasingly utilized prior to CART19 in NHL patients. However, its impact on CART19 outcomes is not established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of BRT prior to CART19 therapy. A comprehensive search was performed in databases from inception to October 2024. We identified 18 studies encompassed 538 adult NHL patients who received BRT prior to commercial CART19. Random-effect models were applied to explore meta-analysis outcomes. DLBCL was the most common diagnosis (73%), and axicabtagene ciloleucel was the most utilized product (67%). Bulky disease was present in 37%. Median BRT dose was 30 Gy delivered comprehensively to all sites of PET avid disease in 76% of cases. ORR to CART19 was 78.9%. At 1 year, PFS was 54.6% while OS was 71.2%. All-grade CRS was 80% while all-grade ICANS was 39.4%. Grade 3/4 CRS was 3.6% and grade 3/4 ICANS was 10.6%. Sensitivity analyses including studies with bulky disease and excluding studies with patients who also received systemic bridging therapy, demonstrated consistent results compared to the main study findings. Sub-group meta-regression showed similar results in studies that utilized BRT only compared to studies that utilized combined-modality treatment. In conclusion, this metaanalysis found that BRT use prior to CART19, whether as a standalone approach or in combination with systemic therapy, does not increase toxicity or compromise the efficacy of CART19 therapy in NHL. Furthermore, use of BRT is associated with low rate of CRS, even in patients with bulky disease.","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Alhomoud,Rahma Ibrahim,Michelle Demetres,Kai Rejeski,Michael Scordo,Roni Shouval,Tobias Tix,Jeremie Martinet,Michelle Foley,Alexandra Gomez-Arteaga,Tsiporah Shore,Paul Pagnini,Mahmoud Aljurf,Monica L Guzman,Silvia Formenti,Joachim Yahalom,Koen Van Besien,Brandon S Imber,Zhengming Chen,Samuel Yamshon\",\"doi\":\"10.3324/haematol.2025.287547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is increasingly utilized prior to CART19 in NHL patients. However, its impact on CART19 outcomes is not established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of BRT prior to CART19 therapy. A comprehensive search was performed in databases from inception to October 2024. We identified 18 studies encompassed 538 adult NHL patients who received BRT prior to commercial CART19. Random-effect models were applied to explore meta-analysis outcomes. DLBCL was the most common diagnosis (73%), and axicabtagene ciloleucel was the most utilized product (67%). Bulky disease was present in 37%. Median BRT dose was 30 Gy delivered comprehensively to all sites of PET avid disease in 76% of cases. ORR to CART19 was 78.9%. At 1 year, PFS was 54.6% while OS was 71.2%. All-grade CRS was 80% while all-grade ICANS was 39.4%. Grade 3/4 CRS was 3.6% and grade 3/4 ICANS was 10.6%. Sensitivity analyses including studies with bulky disease and excluding studies with patients who also received systemic bridging therapy, demonstrated consistent results compared to the main study findings. Sub-group meta-regression showed similar results in studies that utilized BRT only compared to studies that utilized combined-modality treatment. In conclusion, this metaanalysis found that BRT use prior to CART19, whether as a standalone approach or in combination with systemic therapy, does not increase toxicity or compromise the efficacy of CART19 therapy in NHL. Furthermore, use of BRT is associated with low rate of CRS, even in patients with bulky disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haematologica\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haematologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287547\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287547","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

桥接放疗(BRT)越来越多地被用于非hl患者的CART19治疗之前。然而,其对CART19结局的影响尚不确定。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估在CART19治疗之前BRT的安全性和有效性。从启动到2024年10月,在数据库中进行了全面搜索。我们确定了18项研究,包括538名在商业化CART19之前接受BRT治疗的成人NHL患者。采用随机效应模型来探讨meta分析结果。DLBCL是最常见的诊断(73%),axicabtagene ciloleucel是使用最多的产品(67%)。37%的患者存在大体积疾病。在76%的病例中,BRT的中位剂量为30 Gy,全面传递到PET疾病的所有部位。对CART19的ORR为78.9%。1年时,PFS为54.6%,OS为71.2%。全分级CRS为80%,全分级ICANS为39.4%。3/4级CRS为3.6%,3/4级ICANS为10.6%。与主要研究结果相比,敏感性分析(包括大体积疾病研究和排除同时接受全身桥接治疗的患者的研究)显示出一致的结果。亚组荟萃回归显示,仅使用BRT的研究与使用联合治疗的研究结果相似。总之,本荟萃分析发现,在CART19之前使用BRT,无论是单独使用还是与全身治疗联合使用,都不会增加NHL中CART19治疗的毒性或降低疗效。此外,BRT的使用与低CRS率相关,即使在大体积疾病患者中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of bridging radiation therapy prior to CD19 CAR T for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is increasingly utilized prior to CART19 in NHL patients. However, its impact on CART19 outcomes is not established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the safety and efficacy of BRT prior to CART19 therapy. A comprehensive search was performed in databases from inception to October 2024. We identified 18 studies encompassed 538 adult NHL patients who received BRT prior to commercial CART19. Random-effect models were applied to explore meta-analysis outcomes. DLBCL was the most common diagnosis (73%), and axicabtagene ciloleucel was the most utilized product (67%). Bulky disease was present in 37%. Median BRT dose was 30 Gy delivered comprehensively to all sites of PET avid disease in 76% of cases. ORR to CART19 was 78.9%. At 1 year, PFS was 54.6% while OS was 71.2%. All-grade CRS was 80% while all-grade ICANS was 39.4%. Grade 3/4 CRS was 3.6% and grade 3/4 ICANS was 10.6%. Sensitivity analyses including studies with bulky disease and excluding studies with patients who also received systemic bridging therapy, demonstrated consistent results compared to the main study findings. Sub-group meta-regression showed similar results in studies that utilized BRT only compared to studies that utilized combined-modality treatment. In conclusion, this metaanalysis found that BRT use prior to CART19, whether as a standalone approach or in combination with systemic therapy, does not increase toxicity or compromise the efficacy of CART19 therapy in NHL. Furthermore, use of BRT is associated with low rate of CRS, even in patients with bulky disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haematologica
Haematologica 医学-血液学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
349
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research. Scope: The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that: Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases. Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信