阿拉斯加湾部落贝类毒素测试项目社区利用的时空格局。

Esther G Kennedy, John R Harley, Shannon M Cellan, Kari Lanphier, Jeff Feldpausch, Christopher Whitehead, Matthew O Gribble, Hugh B Roland
{"title":"阿拉斯加湾部落贝类毒素测试项目社区利用的时空格局。","authors":"Esther G Kennedy, John R Harley, Shannon M Cellan, Kari Lanphier, Jeff Feldpausch, Christopher Whitehead, Matthew O Gribble, Hugh B Roland","doi":"10.1101/2025.07.01.25330576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rural shellfish harvesters, including many Alaska Native peoples, require safe access to wild shellfish for subsistence, food security, and cultural practices. However, wild shellfish may be contaminated with paralytic shellfish toxins, leaving harvesters with increased risks of significant illness or death. To manage these risks, the Sitka Tribe of Alaska Environmental Research Lab (STAERL) was established to test shellfish samples sent in by harvesters in the community and to support regular monitoring of select local beaches by tribal governments. Here, we investigated harvester utilization of this shellfish testing service from 2016-2024, comprising 299 samples sent in by local harvesters, and used generalized linear models to examine how annual testing rates varied by year, location, species, and species-based detoxification rates. We pay particular attention to differences that may reflect the influence of risk perceptions and accessibility of harvesting and testing on utilization (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.dfn2z35dr). We find that testing utilization has increased through time (1.278, 95% CI: 1.161, 1.407), testing rates are highest in spring and broadly similar between the other three seasons, testing rates in Sitka are much higher than those outside of it, and neither road accessibility nor species-based detoxification rates strongly affect testing rate ratios. These findings suggest that shellfish testing behavior is consistent despite seasonal variations in risk and convenience, but that the STAERL individual testing program provides a pathway to maintain established subsistence harvest practices while reducing poisoning risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Community Utilization of a Tribally Run Shellfish Toxin Testing Program in the Gulf of Alaska.\",\"authors\":\"Esther G Kennedy, John R Harley, Shannon M Cellan, Kari Lanphier, Jeff Feldpausch, Christopher Whitehead, Matthew O Gribble, Hugh B Roland\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.07.01.25330576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rural shellfish harvesters, including many Alaska Native peoples, require safe access to wild shellfish for subsistence, food security, and cultural practices. However, wild shellfish may be contaminated with paralytic shellfish toxins, leaving harvesters with increased risks of significant illness or death. To manage these risks, the Sitka Tribe of Alaska Environmental Research Lab (STAERL) was established to test shellfish samples sent in by harvesters in the community and to support regular monitoring of select local beaches by tribal governments. Here, we investigated harvester utilization of this shellfish testing service from 2016-2024, comprising 299 samples sent in by local harvesters, and used generalized linear models to examine how annual testing rates varied by year, location, species, and species-based detoxification rates. We pay particular attention to differences that may reflect the influence of risk perceptions and accessibility of harvesting and testing on utilization (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.dfn2z35dr). We find that testing utilization has increased through time (1.278, 95% CI: 1.161, 1.407), testing rates are highest in spring and broadly similar between the other three seasons, testing rates in Sitka are much higher than those outside of it, and neither road accessibility nor species-based detoxification rates strongly affect testing rate ratios. These findings suggest that shellfish testing behavior is consistent despite seasonal variations in risk and convenience, but that the STAERL individual testing program provides a pathway to maintain established subsistence harvest practices while reducing poisoning risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.01.25330576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.01.25330576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农村贝类采集者,包括许多阿拉斯加原住民,需要安全获取野生贝类来维持生计、粮食安全和文化习俗。然而,野生贝类可能被麻痹性贝类毒素污染,使采集者面临重大疾病或死亡的风险增加。为了管理这些风险,阿拉斯加锡特卡部落环境研究实验室(STAERL)成立,对社区采集者送来的贝类样本进行测试,并支持部落政府对选定的当地海滩进行定期监测。在这里,我们调查了2016年至2024年间采集者对该贝类检测服务的利用情况,包括当地采集者发送的299份样本,并使用广义线性模型来研究年检测率如何随年份、地点、物种和基于物种的解毒率而变化。我们特别关注可能反映风险认知和收获和测试的可及性对利用的影响的差异(DOI: 10.5061/ drad .dfn2z35dr)。我们发现,检测利用率随着时间的推移而增加(1.278,95% CI: 1.161, 1.407),检测率在春季最高,其他三个季节基本相似,锡特卡地区的检测率远高于其他地区,道路可达性和物种解毒率对检测率的影响都不大。这些发现表明,尽管风险和便利性存在季节性变化,但贝类检测行为是一致的,但STAERL个人检测计划提供了一种途径,可以在保持既定的自给自足捕捞做法的同时降低中毒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Community Utilization of a Tribally Run Shellfish Toxin Testing Program in the Gulf of Alaska.

Rural shellfish harvesters, including many Alaska Native peoples, require safe access to wild shellfish for subsistence, food security, and cultural practices. However, wild shellfish may be contaminated with paralytic shellfish toxins, leaving harvesters with increased risks of significant illness or death. To manage these risks, the Sitka Tribe of Alaska Environmental Research Lab (STAERL) was established to test shellfish samples sent in by harvesters in the community and to support regular monitoring of select local beaches by tribal governments. Here, we investigated harvester utilization of this shellfish testing service from 2016-2024, comprising 299 samples sent in by local harvesters, and used generalized linear models to examine how annual testing rates varied by year, location, species, and species-based detoxification rates. We pay particular attention to differences that may reflect the influence of risk perceptions and accessibility of harvesting and testing on utilization (DOI: 10.5061/dryad.dfn2z35dr). We find that testing utilization has increased through time (1.278, 95% CI: 1.161, 1.407), testing rates are highest in spring and broadly similar between the other three seasons, testing rates in Sitka are much higher than those outside of it, and neither road accessibility nor species-based detoxification rates strongly affect testing rate ratios. These findings suggest that shellfish testing behavior is consistent despite seasonal variations in risk and convenience, but that the STAERL individual testing program provides a pathway to maintain established subsistence harvest practices while reducing poisoning risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信