使用数字脑电图生物标志物对疑似癫痫患者进行优先随访。

Rosie Charles, Emanuela De Falco, Elizabeth Galizia, David Martin-Lopez, Kay Meiklejohn, David Allen, Lydia E Staniaszek, Chris Price, Sophie Georgiou, Manny Bagary, Sakh Khalsa, Charlotte Lawthom, Rohit Shankar, John Terry, Wessel Woldman
{"title":"使用数字脑电图生物标志物对疑似癫痫患者进行优先随访。","authors":"Rosie Charles, Emanuela De Falco, Elizabeth Galizia, David Martin-Lopez, Kay Meiklejohn, David Allen, Lydia E Staniaszek, Chris Price, Sophie Georgiou, Manny Bagary, Sakh Khalsa, Charlotte Lawthom, Rohit Shankar, John Terry, Wessel Woldman","doi":"10.1101/2025.06.30.25330550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lengthy waits for follow-up testing are common for people with suspected epilepsy. This delays diagnosis, prolongs uncertainty and increases seizure risk. Initial EEGs are frequently inconclusive, yet follow-ups are typically dictated by referral date, rather than risk. Here, we tested whether a digital EEG biomarker could help prioritise those most likely to have epilepsy for expedited EEG testing. We analysed 196 non-contributory (non-diagnostic) initial EEGs collected from six National Health Service (NHS) sites in England. From these recordings, we extracted eight computational features and derived a digital biomarker that quantifies the likelihood of the EEG was recorded from someone with active epilepsy. We used this information to reorder follow-up lists and compared outcomes against standard referral-based scheduling. We found that ordering for follow-up testing based upon the digital biomarker consistently prioritised people subsequently diagnosed with epilepsy. The diagnostic yield of each subsequent EEG performed was increased relative to orderings based on time of referral. Our study indicates that a routine EEG may furnish an objective risk metric that could accelerate second-line investigations and so reduce diagnostic delay whilst improving resource allocation in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritising Follow-Up for People with Suspected Epilepsy Using a Digital EEG Biomarker.\",\"authors\":\"Rosie Charles, Emanuela De Falco, Elizabeth Galizia, David Martin-Lopez, Kay Meiklejohn, David Allen, Lydia E Staniaszek, Chris Price, Sophie Georgiou, Manny Bagary, Sakh Khalsa, Charlotte Lawthom, Rohit Shankar, John Terry, Wessel Woldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.06.30.25330550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lengthy waits for follow-up testing are common for people with suspected epilepsy. This delays diagnosis, prolongs uncertainty and increases seizure risk. Initial EEGs are frequently inconclusive, yet follow-ups are typically dictated by referral date, rather than risk. Here, we tested whether a digital EEG biomarker could help prioritise those most likely to have epilepsy for expedited EEG testing. We analysed 196 non-contributory (non-diagnostic) initial EEGs collected from six National Health Service (NHS) sites in England. From these recordings, we extracted eight computational features and derived a digital biomarker that quantifies the likelihood of the EEG was recorded from someone with active epilepsy. We used this information to reorder follow-up lists and compared outcomes against standard referral-based scheduling. We found that ordering for follow-up testing based upon the digital biomarker consistently prioritised people subsequently diagnosed with epilepsy. The diagnostic yield of each subsequent EEG performed was increased relative to orderings based on time of referral. Our study indicates that a routine EEG may furnish an objective risk metric that could accelerate second-line investigations and so reduce diagnostic delay whilst improving resource allocation in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.30.25330550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.30.25330550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于疑似癫痫的患者来说,长时间等待后续检测是很常见的。这会延误诊断,延长不确定性并增加癫痫发作的风险。最初的脑电图通常是不确定的,但随访通常取决于转诊日期,而不是风险。在这里,我们测试了数字脑电图生物标志物是否可以帮助优先考虑那些最有可能患有癫痫的人进行快速脑电图测试。我们分析了从英格兰六个国家卫生服务(NHS)站点收集的196个非缴费(非诊断)初始脑电图。从这些记录中,我们提取了8个计算特征,并得出了一个数字生物标记,该标记量化了活动性癫痫患者记录脑电图的可能性。我们使用这些信息来重新排序随访列表,并将结果与基于转诊的标准日程安排进行比较。我们发现,基于数字生物标志物的后续检测排序始终优先于随后诊断为癫痫的患者。每次后续脑电图的诊断率相对于基于转诊时间的排序有所增加。我们的研究表明,常规脑电图可以提供一个客观的风险指标,可以加快二线调查,从而减少诊断延误,同时改善临床实践中的资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritising Follow-Up for People with Suspected Epilepsy Using a Digital EEG Biomarker.

Lengthy waits for follow-up testing are common for people with suspected epilepsy. This delays diagnosis, prolongs uncertainty and increases seizure risk. Initial EEGs are frequently inconclusive, yet follow-ups are typically dictated by referral date, rather than risk. Here, we tested whether a digital EEG biomarker could help prioritise those most likely to have epilepsy for expedited EEG testing. We analysed 196 non-contributory (non-diagnostic) initial EEGs collected from six National Health Service (NHS) sites in England. From these recordings, we extracted eight computational features and derived a digital biomarker that quantifies the likelihood of the EEG was recorded from someone with active epilepsy. We used this information to reorder follow-up lists and compared outcomes against standard referral-based scheduling. We found that ordering for follow-up testing based upon the digital biomarker consistently prioritised people subsequently diagnosed with epilepsy. The diagnostic yield of each subsequent EEG performed was increased relative to orderings based on time of referral. Our study indicates that a routine EEG may furnish an objective risk metric that could accelerate second-line investigations and so reduce diagnostic delay whilst improving resource allocation in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信