Brenton Hordacre, Jeric Uy, Saran Chamberlain, Ines Serrada, Ashraf N H Gerges, Susan Hillier
{"title":"新兵训练营:慢性中风后强化上肢康复的随机交叉试验。","authors":"Brenton Hordacre, Jeric Uy, Saran Chamberlain, Ines Serrada, Ashraf N H Gerges, Susan Hillier","doi":"10.1177/15459683251348199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundStroke recovery is often incomplete. There is a need to robustly evaluate evidence for intensive stroke rehabilitation.ObjectiveInvestigate feasibility, safety, and preliminary evidence of effectiveness for Boot Camp; a pragmatic, intensive, group-based, 5-week upper-limb rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic stroke.MethodsA pragmatic randomized cross-over trial allocated individuals with chronic stroke to Boot Camp or usual care. Boot Camp delivered 90 hours of upper-limb rehabilitation in a group setting over 5 weeks. Feasibility was evaluated with recruitment rates, adherence, program completion, acceptability, and safety. Clinical characteristics including time since stroke, age, and corticospinal tract integrity were documented. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE). Secondary measures assessed upper-limb activity, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Interviews at the completion of Boot Camp provided insights into participant experiences.ResultsThirty-nine individuals consented, with 38 completing the program (22 male, age 61.5 ± 14.8 years, 2.8 ± 3.4 years since stroke). Feasibility criteria for recruitment, program completion, acceptability, and safety were met, but not adherence to full therapy amount. Boot Camp led to large gains in the FM-UE scores (10.2 ± 4.8, <i>P</i> < .001), upper-limb activity (7.3 ± 8.7, <i>P</i> < .001), quality of life (9.3 ± 22.1, <i>P</i> = .012), and self-efficacy (6.1 ± 13.5, <i>P</i> = .023). Participants reported themes of intensity matters, variety generally works, peer support, goals are motivating.ConclusionBoot Camp was feasible, safe, and led to large and meaningful gains in upper-limb outcomes in individuals with chronic stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":94158,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","volume":" ","pages":"789-800"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boot Camp: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Intensive Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Chronic Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Brenton Hordacre, Jeric Uy, Saran Chamberlain, Ines Serrada, Ashraf N H Gerges, Susan Hillier\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683251348199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundStroke recovery is often incomplete. There is a need to robustly evaluate evidence for intensive stroke rehabilitation.ObjectiveInvestigate feasibility, safety, and preliminary evidence of effectiveness for Boot Camp; a pragmatic, intensive, group-based, 5-week upper-limb rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic stroke.MethodsA pragmatic randomized cross-over trial allocated individuals with chronic stroke to Boot Camp or usual care. Boot Camp delivered 90 hours of upper-limb rehabilitation in a group setting over 5 weeks. Feasibility was evaluated with recruitment rates, adherence, program completion, acceptability, and safety. Clinical characteristics including time since stroke, age, and corticospinal tract integrity were documented. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE). Secondary measures assessed upper-limb activity, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Interviews at the completion of Boot Camp provided insights into participant experiences.ResultsThirty-nine individuals consented, with 38 completing the program (22 male, age 61.5 ± 14.8 years, 2.8 ± 3.4 years since stroke). Feasibility criteria for recruitment, program completion, acceptability, and safety were met, but not adherence to full therapy amount. Boot Camp led to large gains in the FM-UE scores (10.2 ± 4.8, <i>P</i> < .001), upper-limb activity (7.3 ± 8.7, <i>P</i> < .001), quality of life (9.3 ± 22.1, <i>P</i> = .012), and self-efficacy (6.1 ± 13.5, <i>P</i> = .023). Participants reported themes of intensity matters, variety generally works, peer support, goals are motivating.ConclusionBoot Camp was feasible, safe, and led to large and meaningful gains in upper-limb outcomes in individuals with chronic stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"789-800\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12476464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251348199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and neural repair","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683251348199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中风恢复通常是不完整的。有必要对强化脑卒中康复的证据进行强有力的评估。目的探讨新兵训练营的可行性、安全性和有效性的初步证据;一项针对慢性中风患者的实用的、强化的、以小组为基础的、为期5周的上肢康复计划。方法一项实用的随机交叉试验将慢性卒中患者分配到新兵训练营或常规护理组。新兵训练营在5周的时间里提供了90小时的上肢康复治疗。可行性评估包括招募率、依从性、项目完成率、可接受性和安全性。记录临床特征,包括中风后的时间、年龄和皮质脊髓束完整性。主要结局指标为Fugl-Meyer上肢(FM-UE)。次要测量评估上肢活动、生活质量和自我效能。新兵训练营结束时的访谈提供了对参与者经历的深入了解。结果39人同意,38人完成项目,其中男性22人,年龄61.5±14.8岁,脑卒中后2.8±3.4年。招募、项目完成、可接受性和安全性的可行性标准均得到满足,但未达到完全治疗量。新兵训练营显著提高了FM-UE得分(10.2±4.8,P P = 0.012)和自我效能感(6.1±13.5,P = 0.023)。参与者报告了强度问题、多样性通常有效、同伴支持、目标激励等主题。结论新兵训练营是可行的、安全的,对慢性脑卒中患者的上肢预后有显著的改善。
Boot Camp: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial of Intensive Upper-Limb Rehabilitation After Chronic Stroke.
BackgroundStroke recovery is often incomplete. There is a need to robustly evaluate evidence for intensive stroke rehabilitation.ObjectiveInvestigate feasibility, safety, and preliminary evidence of effectiveness for Boot Camp; a pragmatic, intensive, group-based, 5-week upper-limb rehabilitation program for individuals with chronic stroke.MethodsA pragmatic randomized cross-over trial allocated individuals with chronic stroke to Boot Camp or usual care. Boot Camp delivered 90 hours of upper-limb rehabilitation in a group setting over 5 weeks. Feasibility was evaluated with recruitment rates, adherence, program completion, acceptability, and safety. Clinical characteristics including time since stroke, age, and corticospinal tract integrity were documented. The primary outcome measure was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE). Secondary measures assessed upper-limb activity, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Interviews at the completion of Boot Camp provided insights into participant experiences.ResultsThirty-nine individuals consented, with 38 completing the program (22 male, age 61.5 ± 14.8 years, 2.8 ± 3.4 years since stroke). Feasibility criteria for recruitment, program completion, acceptability, and safety were met, but not adherence to full therapy amount. Boot Camp led to large gains in the FM-UE scores (10.2 ± 4.8, P < .001), upper-limb activity (7.3 ± 8.7, P < .001), quality of life (9.3 ± 22.1, P = .012), and self-efficacy (6.1 ± 13.5, P = .023). Participants reported themes of intensity matters, variety generally works, peer support, goals are motivating.ConclusionBoot Camp was feasible, safe, and led to large and meaningful gains in upper-limb outcomes in individuals with chronic stroke.