{"title":"儿童被动电子烟蒸汽暴露:一项系统综述。","authors":"Jeannie Rodriguez, Deborah Silverstein, Abby Mutic, Donghai Liang, Shenita Peterson, Irene Yang","doi":"10.1177/10998004251357832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adults of childbearing age have the highest rate of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use in the United States. Users perceive passive e-cigarette vapor exposure to be less harmful than passive conventional cigarette smoke exposure. We conducted a systematic review to understand the risks of passive e-cigarette vapor exposure in children. Data sources included PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria included studies published between 2010 and 2024 with (1) children ages 0-18 or animal models representing children and in vitro studies, (2) descriptive, experimental, and qualitative designs, and (3) a focus on passive e-cigarette vapor exposure. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with a third for arbitration. Thirty-three studies were included in this review. Emerging evidence, primarily from animal studies, suggests that passive e-cigarette vapor exposure is associated with poor respiratory, immunological, physical growth, and neurological effects. Air assessments noted increased particulate matter and concentrations of nicotine, metals, and volatile organic compounds. Parents were more likely to use e-cigarettes than non-parents, and a majority reported use in the home and car. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 23 of the 33 studies were rated as weak, highlighting methodological limitations in the current evidence base. More rigorously designed studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base. Passive e-cigarette vapor exposure may be harmful to children, and many parents seem unaware of this potential threat. Parents should be cautioned to minimize exposure until more is known.</p>","PeriodicalId":93901,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":" ","pages":"10998004251357832"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Passive Electronic Cigarette Vapor Exposure in Children: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Jeannie Rodriguez, Deborah Silverstein, Abby Mutic, Donghai Liang, Shenita Peterson, Irene Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004251357832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adults of childbearing age have the highest rate of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use in the United States. Users perceive passive e-cigarette vapor exposure to be less harmful than passive conventional cigarette smoke exposure. We conducted a systematic review to understand the risks of passive e-cigarette vapor exposure in children. Data sources included PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria included studies published between 2010 and 2024 with (1) children ages 0-18 or animal models representing children and in vitro studies, (2) descriptive, experimental, and qualitative designs, and (3) a focus on passive e-cigarette vapor exposure. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with a third for arbitration. Thirty-three studies were included in this review. Emerging evidence, primarily from animal studies, suggests that passive e-cigarette vapor exposure is associated with poor respiratory, immunological, physical growth, and neurological effects. Air assessments noted increased particulate matter and concentrations of nicotine, metals, and volatile organic compounds. Parents were more likely to use e-cigarettes than non-parents, and a majority reported use in the home and car. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 23 of the 33 studies were rated as weak, highlighting methodological limitations in the current evidence base. More rigorously designed studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base. Passive e-cigarette vapor exposure may be harmful to children, and many parents seem unaware of this potential threat. Parents should be cautioned to minimize exposure until more is known.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10998004251357832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004251357832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004251357832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在美国,育龄成年人使用电子烟(电子烟)的比例最高。用户认为被动接触电子烟蒸汽的危害比被动接触传统香烟烟雾的危害小。我们进行了一项系统综述,以了解儿童被动接触电子烟蒸汽的风险。数据来源包括PubMed、CINAHL、Web of Science和Scopus。合格标准包括2010年至2024年间发表的研究,其中:(1)0-18岁儿童或代表儿童的动物模型和体外研究,(2)描述性、实验性和定性设计,以及(3)关注被动电子烟蒸汽暴露。两名独立评审员对研究进行了筛选,第三名进行了仲裁。本综述纳入了33项研究。主要来自动物研究的新证据表明,被动电子烟蒸汽暴露与呼吸、免疫、身体发育和神经系统不良影响有关。空气评估指出,颗粒物和尼古丁、金属和挥发性有机化合物的浓度有所增加。父母比非父母更有可能使用电子烟,大多数人报告在家里和车里使用。偏倚风险评估显示,33项研究中有23项被评为弱,突出了当前证据基础的方法学局限性。需要更严格设计的研究来加强证据基础。被动接触电子烟蒸汽可能对儿童有害,许多家长似乎没有意识到这一潜在威胁。应该提醒家长在了解更多情况之前尽量减少接触。
Passive Electronic Cigarette Vapor Exposure in Children: A Systematic Review.
Adults of childbearing age have the highest rate of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use in the United States. Users perceive passive e-cigarette vapor exposure to be less harmful than passive conventional cigarette smoke exposure. We conducted a systematic review to understand the risks of passive e-cigarette vapor exposure in children. Data sources included PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria included studies published between 2010 and 2024 with (1) children ages 0-18 or animal models representing children and in vitro studies, (2) descriptive, experimental, and qualitative designs, and (3) a focus on passive e-cigarette vapor exposure. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with a third for arbitration. Thirty-three studies were included in this review. Emerging evidence, primarily from animal studies, suggests that passive e-cigarette vapor exposure is associated with poor respiratory, immunological, physical growth, and neurological effects. Air assessments noted increased particulate matter and concentrations of nicotine, metals, and volatile organic compounds. Parents were more likely to use e-cigarettes than non-parents, and a majority reported use in the home and car. Risk of bias assessment indicated that 23 of the 33 studies were rated as weak, highlighting methodological limitations in the current evidence base. More rigorously designed studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base. Passive e-cigarette vapor exposure may be harmful to children, and many parents seem unaware of this potential threat. Parents should be cautioned to minimize exposure until more is known.