在低收入和中等收入国家实施以社区为基础的慢性病管理干预措施:定性证据的范围审查。

IF 2.5
PLOS global public health Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004860
Syreen Hassan, Nancy Kagwanja, Brahima Diallo, Robinson Oyando, Pablo Perel, Anthony Etyang, Benjamin Tsofa, Ellen Nolte
{"title":"在低收入和中等收入国家实施以社区为基础的慢性病管理干预措施:定性证据的范围审查。","authors":"Syreen Hassan, Nancy Kagwanja, Brahima Diallo, Robinson Oyando, Pablo Perel, Anthony Etyang, Benjamin Tsofa, Ellen Nolte","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rising prevalence of chronic diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses significant challenges to already overburdened health systems. Community-based interventions are recognised as effective strategies for managing these conditions. However, implementing such interventions faces barriers that can hinder their effectiveness. This scoping review aims to assess qualitative studies examining barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based interventions for chronic disease management in LMICs. We searched six databases for studies published between 2013-2024. Eligible studies were those with a qualitative design that explored implementation challenges and facilitators of community-based interventions. Data were thematically analysed and interpreted using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) to capture multi-level influences on implementation. Eighteen studies were included, covering interventions in 13 LMICs. We identified four levels of influencing the implementation of chronic condition management interventions: individual (service users and providers), community, health system/policy, and interpersonal. Barriers at the individual level included privacy concerns, misconceptions about CHW roles, and a preference for traditional medicine. Facilitators included strong CHW motivation, often driven by personal experiences with the conditions they managed. Community-level support, particularly from local leaders and sensitization events, enhanced intervention acceptance. At the health system level, training quality and role recognition of CHWs were critical, while barriers included excessive workload and insufficient infrastructure. Interpersonal relationships, especially gender dynamics and attitudes of facility-based workers towards CHWs, also influenced implementation outcomes. The quality of qualitative evidence varied, with many studies lacking clear objectives and data collection or analysis frameworks. Effective implementation of community-based interventions for chronic disease management in LMICs requires addressing both systemic and interpersonal barriers. Future interventions should emphasise structured community engagement, comprehensive training, and better integration with healthcare systems. Additionally, improving the methodological rigor of qualitative research is essential for gaining deeper insights into the complex factors that influence the success and sustainability of these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74466,"journal":{"name":"PLOS global public health","volume":"5 7","pages":"e0004860"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237052/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing community-based interventions for the management of chronic conditions in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of qualitative evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Syreen Hassan, Nancy Kagwanja, Brahima Diallo, Robinson Oyando, Pablo Perel, Anthony Etyang, Benjamin Tsofa, Ellen Nolte\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pgph.0004860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rising prevalence of chronic diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses significant challenges to already overburdened health systems. Community-based interventions are recognised as effective strategies for managing these conditions. However, implementing such interventions faces barriers that can hinder their effectiveness. This scoping review aims to assess qualitative studies examining barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based interventions for chronic disease management in LMICs. We searched six databases for studies published between 2013-2024. Eligible studies were those with a qualitative design that explored implementation challenges and facilitators of community-based interventions. Data were thematically analysed and interpreted using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) to capture multi-level influences on implementation. Eighteen studies were included, covering interventions in 13 LMICs. We identified four levels of influencing the implementation of chronic condition management interventions: individual (service users and providers), community, health system/policy, and interpersonal. Barriers at the individual level included privacy concerns, misconceptions about CHW roles, and a preference for traditional medicine. Facilitators included strong CHW motivation, often driven by personal experiences with the conditions they managed. Community-level support, particularly from local leaders and sensitization events, enhanced intervention acceptance. At the health system level, training quality and role recognition of CHWs were critical, while barriers included excessive workload and insufficient infrastructure. Interpersonal relationships, especially gender dynamics and attitudes of facility-based workers towards CHWs, also influenced implementation outcomes. The quality of qualitative evidence varied, with many studies lacking clear objectives and data collection or analysis frameworks. Effective implementation of community-based interventions for chronic disease management in LMICs requires addressing both systemic and interpersonal barriers. Future interventions should emphasise structured community engagement, comprehensive training, and better integration with healthcare systems. Additionally, improving the methodological rigor of qualitative research is essential for gaining deeper insights into the complex factors that influence the success and sustainability of these interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"volume\":\"5 7\",\"pages\":\"e0004860\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237052/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS global public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS global public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0004860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低收入和中等收入国家慢性病流行率的上升对已经负担过重的卫生系统构成了重大挑战。以社区为基础的干预措施被认为是管理这些疾病的有效战略。然而,实施这些干预措施面临着可能阻碍其有效性的障碍。本范围审查的目的是评估定性研究,这些研究考察了中低收入国家实施社区慢性病管理干预措施的障碍和促进因素。我们在六个数据库中检索了2013-2024年间发表的研究。合格的研究是那些具有定性设计的研究,探讨了基于社区的干预措施的实施挑战和促进因素。使用社会生态模型(SEM)对数据进行主题分析和解释,以捕获对实施的多层次影响。纳入了18项研究,涵盖了13个低收入国家的干预措施。我们确定了影响慢性病管理干预措施实施的四个层面:个人(服务使用者和提供者)、社区、卫生系统/政策和人际关系。个人层面的障碍包括隐私问题、对CHW角色的误解以及对传统医学的偏好。促进者包括强烈的CHW动机,通常是由他们管理的条件的个人经历驱动的。社区层面的支持,特别是来自地方领导人和宣传活动的支持,提高了对干预措施的接受度。在卫生系统层面,卫生保健员的培训质量和角色认识至关重要,而障碍包括工作量过大和基础设施不足。人际关系,特别是性别动态和设施工作人员对卫生工作者的态度也影响了实施结果。定性证据的质量参差不齐,许多研究缺乏明确的目标和数据收集或分析框架。在低收入和中等收入国家有效实施社区慢性病管理干预措施需要解决系统和人际障碍。未来的干预措施应强调有组织的社区参与、全面的培训以及与卫生保健系统的更好整合。此外,提高定性研究方法的严谨性对于深入了解影响这些干预措施成功和可持续性的复杂因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing community-based interventions for the management of chronic conditions in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of qualitative evidence.

The rising prevalence of chronic diseases in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses significant challenges to already overburdened health systems. Community-based interventions are recognised as effective strategies for managing these conditions. However, implementing such interventions faces barriers that can hinder their effectiveness. This scoping review aims to assess qualitative studies examining barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based interventions for chronic disease management in LMICs. We searched six databases for studies published between 2013-2024. Eligible studies were those with a qualitative design that explored implementation challenges and facilitators of community-based interventions. Data were thematically analysed and interpreted using the Socio-Ecological Model (SEM) to capture multi-level influences on implementation. Eighteen studies were included, covering interventions in 13 LMICs. We identified four levels of influencing the implementation of chronic condition management interventions: individual (service users and providers), community, health system/policy, and interpersonal. Barriers at the individual level included privacy concerns, misconceptions about CHW roles, and a preference for traditional medicine. Facilitators included strong CHW motivation, often driven by personal experiences with the conditions they managed. Community-level support, particularly from local leaders and sensitization events, enhanced intervention acceptance. At the health system level, training quality and role recognition of CHWs were critical, while barriers included excessive workload and insufficient infrastructure. Interpersonal relationships, especially gender dynamics and attitudes of facility-based workers towards CHWs, also influenced implementation outcomes. The quality of qualitative evidence varied, with many studies lacking clear objectives and data collection or analysis frameworks. Effective implementation of community-based interventions for chronic disease management in LMICs requires addressing both systemic and interpersonal barriers. Future interventions should emphasise structured community engagement, comprehensive training, and better integration with healthcare systems. Additionally, improving the methodological rigor of qualitative research is essential for gaining deeper insights into the complex factors that influence the success and sustainability of these interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信