青少年心理虐待忽视与冲动之间的核心症状:一个网络分析。

IF 3.5 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-20 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.31083/AP44085
Yuhang Wu, Yuqin Song, Lu Pan, Cen Lin, Yu Cen, Mengqin Dai, Qiuyue Fan, Jiarui Shao, Cailin Xie, Jiaming Luo
{"title":"青少年心理虐待忽视与冲动之间的核心症状:一个网络分析。","authors":"Yuhang Wu, Yuqin Song, Lu Pan, Cen Lin, Yu Cen, Mengqin Dai, Qiuyue Fan, Jiarui Shao, Cailin Xie, Jiaming Luo","doi":"10.31083/AP44085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological abuse and neglect are considered fundamental to the development of impulsiveness. However, the interplay between psychological abuse-neglect symptoms and impulsiveness dimensions remains unclear, especially during adolescence, a critical developmental stage. This study uses network analysis to explore the link between adolescent psychological abuse-neglect and impulsivity, aiming to inform targeted early interventions and treatment strategies for impulsive behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cluster sampling was used to gather demographic data from 6731 students across 17 middle schools. Clinical assessments utilized the Chinese Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and Child Psychological Abuse and Neglect Scale (CPANS). Network analysis explored associations between the six CPANS components and three impulsiveness dimensions. Centrality indices and stability indicators were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study population, 47.4% were female, and 68.4% were middle school students. Scolding (4.0 [1.0, 7.0]) scored highest in abuse, while Emotional Neglect (6.0 [2.0, 12.0]) scored highest in neglect. Among impulsive types, Non-planning Impulsiveness (47.5 [32.5, 60.0]) ranked highest. Emotional Neglect emerged as the central node in the network, with the greatest strength, closeness, and influence, while Non-planning Impulsiveness showed the highest correlation with centrality. All centrality indices had Correlation Stability (CS) coefficients of 0.75, with narrow 95% confidence intervals for edge weights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the central role of emotional neglect in the development of impulsive traits in adolescents. Network analysis revealed that emotional neglect serves as a critical link between abuse-neglect and impulsivity, with non-planning impulsivity acting as a key mediator. The results emphasize the need for comprehensive interventions, as well as addressing the impact of early traumatic experiences.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=134138, registration number: ChiCTR2100052297, date of registration: 24 October 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"26 3","pages":"44085"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core Symptoms Between Adolescent Psychological Abuse-Neglect and Impulsiveness: A Network Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuhang Wu, Yuqin Song, Lu Pan, Cen Lin, Yu Cen, Mengqin Dai, Qiuyue Fan, Jiarui Shao, Cailin Xie, Jiaming Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/AP44085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychological abuse and neglect are considered fundamental to the development of impulsiveness. However, the interplay between psychological abuse-neglect symptoms and impulsiveness dimensions remains unclear, especially during adolescence, a critical developmental stage. This study uses network analysis to explore the link between adolescent psychological abuse-neglect and impulsivity, aiming to inform targeted early interventions and treatment strategies for impulsive behaviors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cluster sampling was used to gather demographic data from 6731 students across 17 middle schools. Clinical assessments utilized the Chinese Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and Child Psychological Abuse and Neglect Scale (CPANS). Network analysis explored associations between the six CPANS components and three impulsiveness dimensions. Centrality indices and stability indicators were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study population, 47.4% were female, and 68.4% were middle school students. Scolding (4.0 [1.0, 7.0]) scored highest in abuse, while Emotional Neglect (6.0 [2.0, 12.0]) scored highest in neglect. Among impulsive types, Non-planning Impulsiveness (47.5 [32.5, 60.0]) ranked highest. Emotional Neglect emerged as the central node in the network, with the greatest strength, closeness, and influence, while Non-planning Impulsiveness showed the highest correlation with centrality. All centrality indices had Correlation Stability (CS) coefficients of 0.75, with narrow 95% confidence intervals for edge weights.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the central role of emotional neglect in the development of impulsive traits in adolescents. Network analysis revealed that emotional neglect serves as a critical link between abuse-neglect and impulsivity, with non-planning impulsivity acting as a key mediator. The results emphasize the need for comprehensive interventions, as well as addressing the impact of early traumatic experiences.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=134138, registration number: ChiCTR2100052297, date of registration: 24 October 2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"44085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alpha psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP44085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP44085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心理虐待和忽视被认为是冲动发展的基础。然而,心理虐待-忽视症状与冲动维度之间的相互作用尚不清楚,特别是在青春期这一关键的发展阶段。本研究运用网络分析探讨青少年心理虐待忽视与冲动性之间的关系,旨在为冲动性行为的早期干预和治疗提供有针对性的信息。方法:采用整群抽样的方法,对17所中学6731名学生进行人口统计。临床评估采用中国Barratt冲动量表(BIS-11)和儿童心理虐待与忽视量表(CPANS)。网络分析探讨了六个CPANS成分与三个冲动维度之间的关系。计算中心性指数和稳定性指标。结果:研究人群中女性占47.4%,中学生占68.4%。责骂(4.0分[1.0,7.0分])在虐待中得分最高,而情感忽视(6.0分[2.0,12.0分])在忽视中得分最高。在冲动类型中,非计划性冲动(47.5[32.5,60.0])排名最高。情感忽视是网络的中心节点,具有最大的强度、亲密度和影响力,而非计划性冲动与中心性的相关性最高。所有中心性指数的相关稳定性(CS)系数为0.75,边缘权重的95%置信区间较窄。结论:本研究强调了情绪忽视在青少年冲动特征发展中的核心作用。网络分析表明,情绪忽视是虐待忽视与冲动性之间的关键联系,而非计划性冲动性则是关键中介。研究结果强调了综合干预的必要性,以及解决早期创伤经历的影响。临床试验注册:该研究注册于https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=134138,注册号:ChiCTR2100052297,注册日期:2021年10月24日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Core Symptoms Between Adolescent Psychological Abuse-Neglect and Impulsiveness: A Network Analysis.

Core Symptoms Between Adolescent Psychological Abuse-Neglect and Impulsiveness: A Network Analysis.

Core Symptoms Between Adolescent Psychological Abuse-Neglect and Impulsiveness: A Network Analysis.

Core Symptoms Between Adolescent Psychological Abuse-Neglect and Impulsiveness: A Network Analysis.

Background: Psychological abuse and neglect are considered fundamental to the development of impulsiveness. However, the interplay between psychological abuse-neglect symptoms and impulsiveness dimensions remains unclear, especially during adolescence, a critical developmental stage. This study uses network analysis to explore the link between adolescent psychological abuse-neglect and impulsivity, aiming to inform targeted early interventions and treatment strategies for impulsive behaviors.

Methods: Cluster sampling was used to gather demographic data from 6731 students across 17 middle schools. Clinical assessments utilized the Chinese Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and Child Psychological Abuse and Neglect Scale (CPANS). Network analysis explored associations between the six CPANS components and three impulsiveness dimensions. Centrality indices and stability indicators were calculated.

Results: In the study population, 47.4% were female, and 68.4% were middle school students. Scolding (4.0 [1.0, 7.0]) scored highest in abuse, while Emotional Neglect (6.0 [2.0, 12.0]) scored highest in neglect. Among impulsive types, Non-planning Impulsiveness (47.5 [32.5, 60.0]) ranked highest. Emotional Neglect emerged as the central node in the network, with the greatest strength, closeness, and influence, while Non-planning Impulsiveness showed the highest correlation with centrality. All centrality indices had Correlation Stability (CS) coefficients of 0.75, with narrow 95% confidence intervals for edge weights.

Conclusions: This study underscores the central role of emotional neglect in the development of impulsive traits in adolescents. Network analysis revealed that emotional neglect serves as a critical link between abuse-neglect and impulsivity, with non-planning impulsivity acting as a key mediator. The results emphasize the need for comprehensive interventions, as well as addressing the impact of early traumatic experiences.

Clinical trial registration: The study was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=134138, registration number: ChiCTR2100052297, date of registration: 24 October 2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信