Einar Furulund, Siv-Elin Leirvåg Carlsen, Silvia Eiken Alpers, Jørn Henrik Vold, Karl Trygve Druckrey-Fiskaaen, Tesfaye Madebo, Sindre M Dyrstad, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Lars Thore Fadnes
{"title":"将运动项目纳入阿片类激动剂治疗:可行性、健康改善和参与挑战的初步研究。","authors":"Einar Furulund, Siv-Elin Leirvåg Carlsen, Silvia Eiken Alpers, Jørn Henrik Vold, Karl Trygve Druckrey-Fiskaaen, Tesfaye Madebo, Sindre M Dyrstad, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Lars Thore Fadnes","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00583-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) face high risk of comorbidities, including cardiovascular and mental health disorders. Integrating exercise programs with OAT may reduce health disparities and improve well-being. This study explored the feasibility and preliminary effects of an integrated exercise program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This multicentre, mixed-methods pilot study was conducted in Western Norway, recruiting 22 participants receiving OAT from three outpatient clinics. The six-week, group-based exercise program focused on high-intensity endurance and strength training. Changes in aerobic fitness (4-minut step test), psychological distress (10-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist, SCL-10), fatigue (3-items Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS-3), lung function (spirometry), and respiratory symptoms (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, mMRC) were assessed, while qualitative interviews provided insights into intervention feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre- and post-test assessments indicated improvements in aerobic fitness, as measured by the 4-minute step test, with a pre-test mean of 89.4 (SD: 24.7) and a post-test mean of 103.1 (SD: 31.3) step-cycles, despite a modest attendance rate of 28%. Psychological distress, evaluated using the SCL-10, increased in score from 1.85 (SD: 0.66) to 2.03 (SD: 0.59). Fatigue also increased slightly Fss-3: 4.44 (SD:2.38) to 5.07 (SD:2.01), while respiratory symptoms using mMRC, lung capacity with FVC, and expiratory volume FEV1 remained stable. Qualitative findings were categorized into three main themes: (1) The clinic as an arena for physical activity, (2) a modest move with a substantial benefit for participants, (3) challenges and adjustments to the intervention. Participants reported that exercising in connection with the OAT clinic promoted a sense of care and support from clinicians. Many experienced increased self-confidence and social engagement, though attendance was affected by health issues, fluctuating motivation, and logistical challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests that integrating structured exercise into OAT can be feasible and improve aerobic fitness. However, increased psychological distress and fatigue might indicate the need for additional support. The low attendance rate highlights engagement challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to enhance participation. Future research should focus on optimizing intervention design to improve attendance and enhance physical and psychological outcomes for individuals in OAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating an exercise program into opioid agonist therapy: a pilot study on feasibility, fitness improvements, and participation challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Einar Furulund, Siv-Elin Leirvåg Carlsen, Silvia Eiken Alpers, Jørn Henrik Vold, Karl Trygve Druckrey-Fiskaaen, Tesfaye Madebo, Sindre M Dyrstad, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Lars Thore Fadnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-025-00583-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) face high risk of comorbidities, including cardiovascular and mental health disorders. Integrating exercise programs with OAT may reduce health disparities and improve well-being. This study explored the feasibility and preliminary effects of an integrated exercise program.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This multicentre, mixed-methods pilot study was conducted in Western Norway, recruiting 22 participants receiving OAT from three outpatient clinics. The six-week, group-based exercise program focused on high-intensity endurance and strength training. Changes in aerobic fitness (4-minut step test), psychological distress (10-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist, SCL-10), fatigue (3-items Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS-3), lung function (spirometry), and respiratory symptoms (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, mMRC) were assessed, while qualitative interviews provided insights into intervention feasibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre- and post-test assessments indicated improvements in aerobic fitness, as measured by the 4-minute step test, with a pre-test mean of 89.4 (SD: 24.7) and a post-test mean of 103.1 (SD: 31.3) step-cycles, despite a modest attendance rate of 28%. Psychological distress, evaluated using the SCL-10, increased in score from 1.85 (SD: 0.66) to 2.03 (SD: 0.59). Fatigue also increased slightly Fss-3: 4.44 (SD:2.38) to 5.07 (SD:2.01), while respiratory symptoms using mMRC, lung capacity with FVC, and expiratory volume FEV1 remained stable. Qualitative findings were categorized into three main themes: (1) The clinic as an arena for physical activity, (2) a modest move with a substantial benefit for participants, (3) challenges and adjustments to the intervention. Participants reported that exercising in connection with the OAT clinic promoted a sense of care and support from clinicians. Many experienced increased self-confidence and social engagement, though attendance was affected by health issues, fluctuating motivation, and logistical challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot study suggests that integrating structured exercise into OAT can be feasible and improve aerobic fitness. However, increased psychological distress and fatigue might indicate the need for additional support. The low attendance rate highlights engagement challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to enhance participation. Future research should focus on optimizing intervention design to improve attendance and enhance physical and psychological outcomes for individuals in OAT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235965/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00583-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00583-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating an exercise program into opioid agonist therapy: a pilot study on feasibility, fitness improvements, and participation challenges.
Background: People receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) face high risk of comorbidities, including cardiovascular and mental health disorders. Integrating exercise programs with OAT may reduce health disparities and improve well-being. This study explored the feasibility and preliminary effects of an integrated exercise program.
Method: This multicentre, mixed-methods pilot study was conducted in Western Norway, recruiting 22 participants receiving OAT from three outpatient clinics. The six-week, group-based exercise program focused on high-intensity endurance and strength training. Changes in aerobic fitness (4-minut step test), psychological distress (10-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist, SCL-10), fatigue (3-items Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS-3), lung function (spirometry), and respiratory symptoms (modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, mMRC) were assessed, while qualitative interviews provided insights into intervention feasibility.
Results: Pre- and post-test assessments indicated improvements in aerobic fitness, as measured by the 4-minute step test, with a pre-test mean of 89.4 (SD: 24.7) and a post-test mean of 103.1 (SD: 31.3) step-cycles, despite a modest attendance rate of 28%. Psychological distress, evaluated using the SCL-10, increased in score from 1.85 (SD: 0.66) to 2.03 (SD: 0.59). Fatigue also increased slightly Fss-3: 4.44 (SD:2.38) to 5.07 (SD:2.01), while respiratory symptoms using mMRC, lung capacity with FVC, and expiratory volume FEV1 remained stable. Qualitative findings were categorized into three main themes: (1) The clinic as an arena for physical activity, (2) a modest move with a substantial benefit for participants, (3) challenges and adjustments to the intervention. Participants reported that exercising in connection with the OAT clinic promoted a sense of care and support from clinicians. Many experienced increased self-confidence and social engagement, though attendance was affected by health issues, fluctuating motivation, and logistical challenges.
Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that integrating structured exercise into OAT can be feasible and improve aerobic fitness. However, increased psychological distress and fatigue might indicate the need for additional support. The low attendance rate highlights engagement challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to enhance participation. Future research should focus on optimizing intervention design to improve attendance and enhance physical and psychological outcomes for individuals in OAT.
期刊介绍:
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use.
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations.
Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.