3.5 mm和4.0 mm皮质骨螺钉稳定马舟骨骨折模型的比较。

IF 1.1 2区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Gilles Stucki, Sebastian Valet, Anton E Fuerst, Bernhard Weisse, Michelle A Jackson
{"title":"3.5 mm和4.0 mm皮质骨螺钉稳定马舟骨骨折模型的比较。","authors":"Gilles Stucki, Sebastian Valet, Anton E Fuerst, Bernhard Weisse, Michelle A Jackson","doi":"10.1055/a-2640-3556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the strength (load at failure) and the number of cycles to failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs for repair of navicular bone fractures in horses.This was an in vitro biomechanical study that used a four-point bending apparatus to determine the load at failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs subjected to static and cyclic loading.In static testing, pairwise comparison of 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs demonstrated significantly greater strength (mean increase: +16%, <i>p</i> = 0.0135) compared with those in the 3.5-mm group. In cyclic testing, the mean number of cycles to failure for the 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone construct was not significantly different from that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw-bone construct, due to a high variability in the values.A 4.0-mm cortical screw offers biomechanical advantages over a 3.5-mm cortical screw and may be an alternative implant for the treatment of navicular bone fractures in horses. Further clinical studies are needed to determine whether this screw can also be inserted without complications in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 3.5- and 4.0-mm Cortical Bone Screws for Stabilization of an Equine Navicular Bone Fracture Model.\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Stucki, Sebastian Valet, Anton E Fuerst, Bernhard Weisse, Michelle A Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2640-3556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the strength (load at failure) and the number of cycles to failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs for repair of navicular bone fractures in horses.This was an in vitro biomechanical study that used a four-point bending apparatus to determine the load at failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs subjected to static and cyclic loading.In static testing, pairwise comparison of 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs demonstrated significantly greater strength (mean increase: +16%, <i>p</i> = 0.0135) compared with those in the 3.5-mm group. In cyclic testing, the mean number of cycles to failure for the 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone construct was not significantly different from that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw-bone construct, due to a high variability in the values.A 4.0-mm cortical screw offers biomechanical advantages over a 3.5-mm cortical screw and may be an alternative implant for the treatment of navicular bone fractures in horses. Further clinical studies are needed to determine whether this screw can also be inserted without complications in vivo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2640-3556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2640-3556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较3.5 mm和4.0 mm皮质螺钉-骨结构体用于修复马舟骨骨折的强度(失效载荷)和失效循环次数。这是一项体外生物力学研究,使用四点弯曲装置来确定3.5和4.0 mm皮质螺钉-骨结构在静态和循环载荷下的失效载荷。在静态测试中,与3.5 mm组相比,4.0 mm皮质螺钉-骨构建体的两两比较显示强度显著增加(平均增加16%,p = 0.0135)。在循环测试中,由于数值的高度可变性,4.0 mm皮质螺钉-骨构建体的平均失败循环次数与3.5 mm皮质螺钉-骨构建体没有显著差异。与3.5 mm皮质螺钉相比,4.0 mm皮质螺钉具有生物力学上的优势,可能是治疗马舟骨骨折的替代植入物。需要进一步的临床研究来确定该螺钉是否也可以在体内无并发症地插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of 3.5- and 4.0-mm Cortical Bone Screws for Stabilization of an Equine Navicular Bone Fracture Model.

The aim of this study was to compare the strength (load at failure) and the number of cycles to failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs for repair of navicular bone fractures in horses.This was an in vitro biomechanical study that used a four-point bending apparatus to determine the load at failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs subjected to static and cyclic loading.In static testing, pairwise comparison of 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs demonstrated significantly greater strength (mean increase: +16%, p = 0.0135) compared with those in the 3.5-mm group. In cyclic testing, the mean number of cycles to failure for the 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone construct was not significantly different from that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw-bone construct, due to a high variability in the values.A 4.0-mm cortical screw offers biomechanical advantages over a 3.5-mm cortical screw and may be an alternative implant for the treatment of navicular bone fractures in horses. Further clinical studies are needed to determine whether this screw can also be inserted without complications in vivo.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
49
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信