Gilles Stucki, Sebastian Valet, Anton E Fuerst, Bernhard Weisse, Michelle A Jackson
{"title":"3.5 mm和4.0 mm皮质骨螺钉稳定马舟骨骨折模型的比较。","authors":"Gilles Stucki, Sebastian Valet, Anton E Fuerst, Bernhard Weisse, Michelle A Jackson","doi":"10.1055/a-2640-3556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the strength (load at failure) and the number of cycles to failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs for repair of navicular bone fractures in horses.This was an in vitro biomechanical study that used a four-point bending apparatus to determine the load at failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs subjected to static and cyclic loading.In static testing, pairwise comparison of 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs demonstrated significantly greater strength (mean increase: +16%, <i>p</i> = 0.0135) compared with those in the 3.5-mm group. In cyclic testing, the mean number of cycles to failure for the 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone construct was not significantly different from that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw-bone construct, due to a high variability in the values.A 4.0-mm cortical screw offers biomechanical advantages over a 3.5-mm cortical screw and may be an alternative implant for the treatment of navicular bone fractures in horses. Further clinical studies are needed to determine whether this screw can also be inserted without complications in vivo.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of 3.5- and 4.0-mm Cortical Bone Screws for Stabilization of an Equine Navicular Bone Fracture Model.\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Stucki, Sebastian Valet, Anton E Fuerst, Bernhard Weisse, Michelle A Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2640-3556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the strength (load at failure) and the number of cycles to failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs for repair of navicular bone fractures in horses.This was an in vitro biomechanical study that used a four-point bending apparatus to determine the load at failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs subjected to static and cyclic loading.In static testing, pairwise comparison of 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs demonstrated significantly greater strength (mean increase: +16%, <i>p</i> = 0.0135) compared with those in the 3.5-mm group. In cyclic testing, the mean number of cycles to failure for the 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone construct was not significantly different from that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw-bone construct, due to a high variability in the values.A 4.0-mm cortical screw offers biomechanical advantages over a 3.5-mm cortical screw and may be an alternative implant for the treatment of navicular bone fractures in horses. Further clinical studies are needed to determine whether this screw can also be inserted without complications in vivo.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2640-3556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2640-3556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of 3.5- and 4.0-mm Cortical Bone Screws for Stabilization of an Equine Navicular Bone Fracture Model.
The aim of this study was to compare the strength (load at failure) and the number of cycles to failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs for repair of navicular bone fractures in horses.This was an in vitro biomechanical study that used a four-point bending apparatus to determine the load at failure of 3.5- and 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs subjected to static and cyclic loading.In static testing, pairwise comparison of 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone constructs demonstrated significantly greater strength (mean increase: +16%, p = 0.0135) compared with those in the 3.5-mm group. In cyclic testing, the mean number of cycles to failure for the 4.0-mm cortical screw-bone construct was not significantly different from that of the 3.5-mm cortical screw-bone construct, due to a high variability in the values.A 4.0-mm cortical screw offers biomechanical advantages over a 3.5-mm cortical screw and may be an alternative implant for the treatment of navicular bone fractures in horses. Further clinical studies are needed to determine whether this screw can also be inserted without complications in vivo.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.