以视频为基础的翻转课堂教学对澳索医学院医学生理学教学的影响及效果。

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S528714
Praveen Kottath Veetil, Manoj Kollukkad Mani, Sateesh B Arja, Simi Paramban, Preetha Alambally Kattambally, Reshma Fatteh, Sireesha B Arja
{"title":"以视频为基础的翻转课堂教学对澳索医学院医学生理学教学的影响及效果。","authors":"Praveen Kottath Veetil, Manoj Kollukkad Mani, Sateesh B Arja, Simi Paramban, Preetha Alambally Kattambally, Reshma Fatteh, Sireesha B Arja","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S528714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical education has shifted from traditional teaching methods to interactive learning, emphasizing student engagement and critical thinking for enhanced problem-solving skills. There is a growing shift toward active learning strategies, such as the flipped classroom model, in the current medical education settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Physiology course of basic sciences at Avalon University School of Medicine, Curacao, using a video-based flipped classroom (VBFC) model. Hundred short instructional videos were created and integrated into 65 Physiology sessions. Pre- and post-implementation surveys assessed students' perceptions and the effectiveness of VBFC. Grade comparison of students was analyzed using paired to evaluate learning outcomes between VBFC and traditional lecture formats.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VBFC in physiology courses revealed promising results, improving student performance and engagement. Physiology scores, which were significantly lower than the overall course scores before introducing the VBFC approach (p = 0.0216), showed improvement and aligned with the overall scores following its implementation. Students demonstrated a positive attitude toward this method, indicating that video-based pre-class learning was effective. Survey responses consistently reflected agreement with the advantages of this approach. In particular, students expressed strong agreement regarding three key aspects: the appropriate length of each video, the quality and usefulness of the 1 to 5 follow-up questions accompanying each video, and the importance of sustaining this teaching method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The flipped classroom model supported student engagement and promoted self-directed learning, potentially aiding in the understanding of subjects like physiology. Grounded in Piaget's cognitive development theory, this approach promotes abstract thinking, logical reasoning, and problem-solving skills. Despite limitations such as small sample size and study duration, the results suggest the flipped classroom model can significantly enhance medical students' outcomes in physiology.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":"16 ","pages":"1159-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student Perceptions and Effectiveness of Video-Based Flipped Classroom for Improving Medical Physiology Teaching at AUSOM.\",\"authors\":\"Praveen Kottath Veetil, Manoj Kollukkad Mani, Sateesh B Arja, Simi Paramban, Preetha Alambally Kattambally, Reshma Fatteh, Sireesha B Arja\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S528714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical education has shifted from traditional teaching methods to interactive learning, emphasizing student engagement and critical thinking for enhanced problem-solving skills. There is a growing shift toward active learning strategies, such as the flipped classroom model, in the current medical education settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Physiology course of basic sciences at Avalon University School of Medicine, Curacao, using a video-based flipped classroom (VBFC) model. Hundred short instructional videos were created and integrated into 65 Physiology sessions. Pre- and post-implementation surveys assessed students' perceptions and the effectiveness of VBFC. Grade comparison of students was analyzed using paired to evaluate learning outcomes between VBFC and traditional lecture formats.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VBFC in physiology courses revealed promising results, improving student performance and engagement. Physiology scores, which were significantly lower than the overall course scores before introducing the VBFC approach (p = 0.0216), showed improvement and aligned with the overall scores following its implementation. Students demonstrated a positive attitude toward this method, indicating that video-based pre-class learning was effective. Survey responses consistently reflected agreement with the advantages of this approach. In particular, students expressed strong agreement regarding three key aspects: the appropriate length of each video, the quality and usefulness of the 1 to 5 follow-up questions accompanying each video, and the importance of sustaining this teaching method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The flipped classroom model supported student engagement and promoted self-directed learning, potentially aiding in the understanding of subjects like physiology. Grounded in Piaget's cognitive development theory, this approach promotes abstract thinking, logical reasoning, and problem-solving skills. Despite limitations such as small sample size and study duration, the results suggest the flipped classroom model can significantly enhance medical students' outcomes in physiology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1159-1167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12234644/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S528714\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S528714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医学教育已经从传统的教学方法转向互动式学习,强调学生的参与和批判性思维,以提高解决问题的能力。在当前的医学教育环境中,越来越多的人转向主动学习策略,例如翻转课堂模式。方法:采用基于视频的翻转课堂(VBFC)模式,对库拉索阿瓦隆大学医学院基础科学生理学课程进行准实验研究。我们制作了100个简短的教学视频,并将其整合到65个生理学课程中。实施前和实施后的调查评估了学生对VBFC的看法和有效性。学生的年级比较采用配对的方法来评估VBFC和传统讲座形式的学习效果。结果:在生理学课程中使用VBFC显示出良好的效果,提高了学生的学习成绩和参与度。在引入VBFC方法之前,生理学分数明显低于总体课程分数(p = 0.0216),在实施该方法后,表现出改善并与总体分数一致。学生对这种方法表现出积极的态度,表明基于视频的课前学习是有效的。调查结果一致反映了对这种方法优点的认同。特别是,学生们对三个关键方面表达了强烈的同意:每个视频的适当长度,每个视频附带的1到5个后续问题的质量和有用性,以及维持这种教学方法的重要性。结论:翻转课堂模式支持学生参与,促进自主学习,可能有助于理解生理学等学科。这种方法以皮亚杰的认知发展理论为基础,促进抽象思维、逻辑推理和解决问题的能力。尽管样本量小,研究时间长,但结果表明,翻转课堂模式可以显著提高医学生的生理成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student Perceptions and Effectiveness of Video-Based Flipped Classroom for Improving Medical Physiology Teaching at AUSOM.

Background: Medical education has shifted from traditional teaching methods to interactive learning, emphasizing student engagement and critical thinking for enhanced problem-solving skills. There is a growing shift toward active learning strategies, such as the flipped classroom model, in the current medical education settings.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted in the Physiology course of basic sciences at Avalon University School of Medicine, Curacao, using a video-based flipped classroom (VBFC) model. Hundred short instructional videos were created and integrated into 65 Physiology sessions. Pre- and post-implementation surveys assessed students' perceptions and the effectiveness of VBFC. Grade comparison of students was analyzed using paired to evaluate learning outcomes between VBFC and traditional lecture formats.

Results: The VBFC in physiology courses revealed promising results, improving student performance and engagement. Physiology scores, which were significantly lower than the overall course scores before introducing the VBFC approach (p = 0.0216), showed improvement and aligned with the overall scores following its implementation. Students demonstrated a positive attitude toward this method, indicating that video-based pre-class learning was effective. Survey responses consistently reflected agreement with the advantages of this approach. In particular, students expressed strong agreement regarding three key aspects: the appropriate length of each video, the quality and usefulness of the 1 to 5 follow-up questions accompanying each video, and the importance of sustaining this teaching method.

Conclusion: The flipped classroom model supported student engagement and promoted self-directed learning, potentially aiding in the understanding of subjects like physiology. Grounded in Piaget's cognitive development theory, this approach promotes abstract thinking, logical reasoning, and problem-solving skills. Despite limitations such as small sample size and study duration, the results suggest the flipped classroom model can significantly enhance medical students' outcomes in physiology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信