腰骶椎角度可以预测常规矢状位MRI的腰骶过渡椎。

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Farrokh Seilanian Toosi, Bahare Mahdianfar, Ahmadreza Zarifian, Ehsan Keykhosravi, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Maryam Ghandhari, Farzaneh Khoroushi, Maryam Emadzadeh, Hormoz Abedi, Behzad Aminzadeh
{"title":"腰骶椎角度可以预测常规矢状位MRI的腰骶过渡椎。","authors":"Farrokh Seilanian Toosi, Bahare Mahdianfar, Ahmadreza Zarifian, Ehsan Keykhosravi, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Maryam Ghandhari, Farzaneh Khoroushi, Maryam Emadzadeh, Hormoz Abedi, Behzad Aminzadeh","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.83244.3790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to measure lumbosacral vertebral angles in routine lumbar sagittal MRIs and assess their association with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 220 patients referring to our hospital for routine lumbar MRI during 2020-2021. All the participants were subject to routine sagittal lumbar MRI, whole spine localizer scan, and coronal MRI to numerate lumbar vertebrae. Five vertebral angles (A, B, C, D, and delta) and dehydration in L4-L5 and L5-S1 discs were assessed in sagittal MRI scans. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 220 participants (mean age: 44.29 ± 14.14 years), 36 (16.36%) were diagnosed with LSTV. Among those diagnosed with LSTV, L5-S1 dehydration was less frequently observed compared to other participants (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression showed that dehydrated L4-L5 disc, non-dehydrated L5-S1 disc, increased A-angle, and decreased D-angle can independently predict LSTV. The median A-angle was significantly larger in LSTV patients than in non-LSTV participants (P = 0.038), while the medians of C-angle, D-angle, and delta-angle were significantly smaller in the LSTV group (P < 0.05). A C-angle ≤ 35.5˚ could diagnose LSTV with sensitivity and specificity of 72.2% and 57.6%, respectively. A delta angle ≤ 8.5˚ could diagnose type 2 LSTV with 92.3% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring lumbosacral vertebral angles, especially delta-angle, in routine sagittal MRI can potentially alert physicians of a likely LSTV diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 5","pages":"271-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbosacral Vertebral Angles can Predict Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae on Routine Sagittal MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Farrokh Seilanian Toosi, Bahare Mahdianfar, Ahmadreza Zarifian, Ehsan Keykhosravi, Amir Mahmoud Ahmadzadeh, Maryam Ghandhari, Farzaneh Khoroushi, Maryam Emadzadeh, Hormoz Abedi, Behzad Aminzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/ABJS.2025.83244.3790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to measure lumbosacral vertebral angles in routine lumbar sagittal MRIs and assess their association with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 220 patients referring to our hospital for routine lumbar MRI during 2020-2021. All the participants were subject to routine sagittal lumbar MRI, whole spine localizer scan, and coronal MRI to numerate lumbar vertebrae. Five vertebral angles (A, B, C, D, and delta) and dehydration in L4-L5 and L5-S1 discs were assessed in sagittal MRI scans. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 220 participants (mean age: 44.29 ± 14.14 years), 36 (16.36%) were diagnosed with LSTV. Among those diagnosed with LSTV, L5-S1 dehydration was less frequently observed compared to other participants (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression showed that dehydrated L4-L5 disc, non-dehydrated L5-S1 disc, increased A-angle, and decreased D-angle can independently predict LSTV. The median A-angle was significantly larger in LSTV patients than in non-LSTV participants (P = 0.038), while the medians of C-angle, D-angle, and delta-angle were significantly smaller in the LSTV group (P < 0.05). A C-angle ≤ 35.5˚ could diagnose LSTV with sensitivity and specificity of 72.2% and 57.6%, respectively. A delta angle ≤ 8.5˚ could diagnose type 2 LSTV with 92.3% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measuring lumbosacral vertebral angles, especially delta-angle, in routine sagittal MRI can potentially alert physicians of a likely LSTV diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"volume\":\"13 5\",\"pages\":\"271-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12232574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2025.83244.3790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2025.83244.3790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是在常规腰椎矢状面mri中测量腰骶椎体角,并评估其与腰骶移行椎体(LSTV)的关系。方法:在2020-2021年期间,我们招募了220名患者来我院进行常规腰椎MRI检查。所有参与者均接受常规腰椎矢状位MRI,全脊柱定位扫描和冠状位MRI以计算腰椎。在矢状面MRI扫描中评估L4-L5和L5-S1椎间盘的5个椎体角(A、B、C、D和delta)和脱水情况。数据采用SPSS 26进行分析。结果:220名参与者(平均年龄:44.29±14.14岁)中,36名(16.36%)被诊断为LSTV。在诊断为LSTV的患者中,与其他参与者相比,L5-S1脱水的发生率较低(P < 0.001)。多元回归结果显示,L4-L5椎间盘脱水、L5-S1椎间盘未脱水、a角增大、d角减小均能独立预测LSTV。LSTV组患者a角中位数明显大于非LSTV组(P = 0.038),而LSTV组c角、d角、delta角中位数明显小于非LSTV组(P < 0.05)。c角≤35.5˚诊断LSTV的敏感性和特异性分别为72.2%和57.6%。δ角≤8.5˚诊断2型LSTV的敏感性为92.3%,特异性为87.9%。结论:在常规矢状位MRI中测量腰骶椎角,特别是三角角,可以潜在地提醒医生可能的LSTV诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lumbosacral Vertebral Angles can Predict Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae on Routine Sagittal MRI.

Objectives: We aimed to measure lumbosacral vertebral angles in routine lumbar sagittal MRIs and assess their association with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV).

Methods: We recruited 220 patients referring to our hospital for routine lumbar MRI during 2020-2021. All the participants were subject to routine sagittal lumbar MRI, whole spine localizer scan, and coronal MRI to numerate lumbar vertebrae. Five vertebral angles (A, B, C, D, and delta) and dehydration in L4-L5 and L5-S1 discs were assessed in sagittal MRI scans. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.

Results: Out of 220 participants (mean age: 44.29 ± 14.14 years), 36 (16.36%) were diagnosed with LSTV. Among those diagnosed with LSTV, L5-S1 dehydration was less frequently observed compared to other participants (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression showed that dehydrated L4-L5 disc, non-dehydrated L5-S1 disc, increased A-angle, and decreased D-angle can independently predict LSTV. The median A-angle was significantly larger in LSTV patients than in non-LSTV participants (P = 0.038), while the medians of C-angle, D-angle, and delta-angle were significantly smaller in the LSTV group (P < 0.05). A C-angle ≤ 35.5˚ could diagnose LSTV with sensitivity and specificity of 72.2% and 57.6%, respectively. A delta angle ≤ 8.5˚ could diagnose type 2 LSTV with 92.3% sensitivity and 87.9% specificity.

Conclusion: Measuring lumbosacral vertebral angles, especially delta-angle, in routine sagittal MRI can potentially alert physicians of a likely LSTV diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信