病理学家进行超声引导细针抽吸(US-FNA):美国细胞病理学协会赞助调查的现状、趋势和见解。

Q2 Medicine
Daniel F I Kurtycz, Zubair W Baloch, Ronald Balassanian, Terrance Lynn, Poonam Vohra, Maoxin Wu
{"title":"病理学家进行超声引导细针抽吸(US-FNA):美国细胞病理学协会赞助调查的现状、趋势和见解。","authors":"Daniel F I Kurtycz, Zubair W Baloch, Ronald Balassanian, Terrance Lynn, Poonam Vohra, Maoxin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) performed by cytopathologists represents prospects for expanding cytopathology practice. While there is a perceived need for further education and standardization to support future opportunities, this need remains insufficiently documented. The Product Innovation Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology conducted a survey to gather opinions and examine current practices in US-FNA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey of 32 questions focused on US-FNA practice was open from December 19, 2022, to March 19, 2023, promoted through national and international cytopathology professional societies, using Qualtrics survey software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 individuals accessed the survey, with 174 (68% from the USA) successfully completing a qualifying question. Data collected included information on certification, work setting, workload, and years of practice (mean: 16 years, range: 0-50 years). Fifty-nine percent (80/135) were certified in cytopathology by the American Board of Pathology or the International Academy of Cytology. Sixty-three percent (84/134) practiced in academia. Over one-half (70/123) worked in low-volume settings (0-50 US-FNA procedures/year), while 19% worked in medium-to-high volume settings (>300 US-FNA procedures/year). Responses showed variability in diagnostic practices and patient management. Nearly one-half (67/137) of respondents indicated that their pathologists performed US-FNA. Most, but not all, reported following standard procedures, including informed consent, site verification, procedure time-out, and documentation of both the procedure and ultrasound findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathologist performed US-FNA represents an opportunity for growth, but there are significant barriers to adoption including: training, equipment, reimbursement, and procedural variability. This survey stands as an initial step to developing recommendations on best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":38262,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathologist performed ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA): current status, trends, and insights from the American Society of Cytopathology Sponsored Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel F I Kurtycz, Zubair W Baloch, Ronald Balassanian, Terrance Lynn, Poonam Vohra, Maoxin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) performed by cytopathologists represents prospects for expanding cytopathology practice. While there is a perceived need for further education and standardization to support future opportunities, this need remains insufficiently documented. The Product Innovation Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology conducted a survey to gather opinions and examine current practices in US-FNA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An online survey of 32 questions focused on US-FNA practice was open from December 19, 2022, to March 19, 2023, promoted through national and international cytopathology professional societies, using Qualtrics survey software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 216 individuals accessed the survey, with 174 (68% from the USA) successfully completing a qualifying question. Data collected included information on certification, work setting, workload, and years of practice (mean: 16 years, range: 0-50 years). Fifty-nine percent (80/135) were certified in cytopathology by the American Board of Pathology or the International Academy of Cytology. Sixty-three percent (84/134) practiced in academia. Over one-half (70/123) worked in low-volume settings (0-50 US-FNA procedures/year), while 19% worked in medium-to-high volume settings (>300 US-FNA procedures/year). Responses showed variability in diagnostic practices and patient management. Nearly one-half (67/137) of respondents indicated that their pathologists performed US-FNA. Most, but not all, reported following standard procedures, including informed consent, site verification, procedure time-out, and documentation of both the procedure and ultrasound findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pathologist performed US-FNA represents an opportunity for growth, but there are significant barriers to adoption including: training, equipment, reimbursement, and procedural variability. This survey stands as an initial step to developing recommendations on best practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2025.05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由细胞病理学家执行的超声引导细针穿刺(US-FNA)代表了扩大细胞病理学实践的前景。虽然人们认为需要进一步的教育和标准化来支持未来的机会,但这种需求仍然没有得到充分的记录。美国细胞病理学学会产品创新委员会进行了一项调查,以收集意见并检查US-FNA的现行做法。材料与方法:于2022年12月19日至2023年3月19日,通过国内和国际细胞病理学专业学会,使用Qualtrics调查软件,对US-FNA实践进行了32个问题的在线调查。结果:共有216人参与了调查,其中174人(68%来自美国)成功完成了一个合格问题。收集的数据包括有关认证、工作设置、工作量和实践年数的信息(平均:16年,范围:0-50年)。59%(80/135)的人获得了美国病理委员会或国际细胞学学会的细胞病理学认证。63%(84/134)在学术界工作。超过一半(70/123)的人在低容量环境中工作(每年0-50次US-FNA程序),而19%的人在中高容量环境中工作(每年300次US-FNA程序)。反应显示在诊断实践和患者管理方面存在差异。近一半(67/137)的受访者表示他们的病理学家进行了US-FNA。大多数(但不是全部)报告遵循了标准程序,包括知情同意、现场验证、程序暂停以及程序和超声结果的记录。结论:病理学家进行US-FNA代表了增长的机会,但采用存在重大障碍,包括:培训,设备,报销和程序可变性。这项调查是制定最佳做法建议的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathologist performed ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA): current status, trends, and insights from the American Society of Cytopathology Sponsored Survey.

Introduction: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) performed by cytopathologists represents prospects for expanding cytopathology practice. While there is a perceived need for further education and standardization to support future opportunities, this need remains insufficiently documented. The Product Innovation Committee of the American Society of Cytopathology conducted a survey to gather opinions and examine current practices in US-FNA.

Materials and methods: An online survey of 32 questions focused on US-FNA practice was open from December 19, 2022, to March 19, 2023, promoted through national and international cytopathology professional societies, using Qualtrics survey software.

Results: A total of 216 individuals accessed the survey, with 174 (68% from the USA) successfully completing a qualifying question. Data collected included information on certification, work setting, workload, and years of practice (mean: 16 years, range: 0-50 years). Fifty-nine percent (80/135) were certified in cytopathology by the American Board of Pathology or the International Academy of Cytology. Sixty-three percent (84/134) practiced in academia. Over one-half (70/123) worked in low-volume settings (0-50 US-FNA procedures/year), while 19% worked in medium-to-high volume settings (>300 US-FNA procedures/year). Responses showed variability in diagnostic practices and patient management. Nearly one-half (67/137) of respondents indicated that their pathologists performed US-FNA. Most, but not all, reported following standard procedures, including informed consent, site verification, procedure time-out, and documentation of both the procedure and ultrasound findings.

Conclusions: Pathologist performed US-FNA represents an opportunity for growth, but there are significant barriers to adoption including: training, equipment, reimbursement, and procedural variability. This survey stands as an initial step to developing recommendations on best practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology
Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信