Carl Sars, Jan Frisell, Paul W Dickman, Helena Sackey, Ebba K Lindqvist
{"title":"叶状肿瘤手术后局部复发的宽与窄边缘的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案。","authors":"Carl Sars, Jan Frisell, Paul W Dickman, Helena Sackey, Ebba K Lindqvist","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02904-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial breast lesions graded as benign, borderline, or malignant. Surgical resection with clear margins is the primary method of treatment. Consensus on margin width could prevent unnecessary large primary resections or reoperations, yet the optimal margins for different tumor grades remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the effect of wide versus narrow margins on local recurrence rates after surgery for phyllodes tumors of the breast. In addition, the re-excision rates, adjuvant treatment and adverse events will be assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An information specialist will assist in searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as gray literature to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series. Relevant abstracts from professional society meetings and web-based registries of clinical trials will also be included via hand-search and by forward-tracking papers and by searching the reference lists of the obtained articles. Studies included will compare patients, without age limitation, who were surgically treated for a histopathologically confirmed phyllodes tumor of the breast. Studies reporting both local recurrence rate and surgical excision margins will be included. No language restriction will be applied. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the studies identified during the search using pre-defined inclusion criteria and data extraction from the full texts of selected studies will be performed. The quality of included studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for case series. A meta-analysis on pooled local recurrence rates will be conducted, stratified by different phyllodes tumor grades and surgical margins.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review will provide a synthesis of current evidence on the optimal surgical margins of phyllodes tumors and its effect on local recurrence rates. These findings aim to provide clinicians with guidelines and to establish a strong research base for future studies in this field.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420250640098.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235997/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local recurrence of phyllodes tumors after surgery with wide compared to narrow margins: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carl Sars, Jan Frisell, Paul W Dickman, Helena Sackey, Ebba K Lindqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-025-02904-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial breast lesions graded as benign, borderline, or malignant. Surgical resection with clear margins is the primary method of treatment. Consensus on margin width could prevent unnecessary large primary resections or reoperations, yet the optimal margins for different tumor grades remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the effect of wide versus narrow margins on local recurrence rates after surgery for phyllodes tumors of the breast. In addition, the re-excision rates, adjuvant treatment and adverse events will be assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An information specialist will assist in searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as gray literature to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series. Relevant abstracts from professional society meetings and web-based registries of clinical trials will also be included via hand-search and by forward-tracking papers and by searching the reference lists of the obtained articles. Studies included will compare patients, without age limitation, who were surgically treated for a histopathologically confirmed phyllodes tumor of the breast. Studies reporting both local recurrence rate and surgical excision margins will be included. No language restriction will be applied. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the studies identified during the search using pre-defined inclusion criteria and data extraction from the full texts of selected studies will be performed. The quality of included studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for case series. A meta-analysis on pooled local recurrence rates will be conducted, stratified by different phyllodes tumor grades and surgical margins.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review will provide a synthesis of current evidence on the optimal surgical margins of phyllodes tumors and its effect on local recurrence rates. These findings aim to provide clinicians with guidelines and to establish a strong research base for future studies in this field.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420250640098.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235997/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02904-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02904-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:叶状瘤是一种罕见的乳腺纤维上皮病变,可分为良性、交界性和恶性。手术切除清除边缘是治疗的主要方法。对切缘宽度的共识可以防止不必要的大面积原发切除或再手术,但不同肿瘤级别的最佳切缘仍不清楚。本系统综述和荟萃分析将评估宽切缘与窄切缘对乳腺叶状瘤术后局部复发率的影响。此外,将评估再切除率、辅助治疗和不良事件。方法:信息专家将协助检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar和Cochrane Library数据库,以及灰色文献,以识别随机对照试验、观察性研究和病例系列。专业学会会议和基于网络的临床试验登记处的相关摘要也将通过手工检索和前瞻性跟踪论文以及检索已获得文章的参考文献列表来纳入。纳入的研究将比较因组织病理学证实的乳腺叶状瘤而接受手术治疗的患者,不受年龄限制。报告局部复发率和手术切除边缘的研究将包括在内。不受语言限制。两名审稿人将使用预定义的纳入标准独立筛选检索过程中确定的研究的标题和摘要,并从所选研究的全文中提取数据。纳入研究的质量将由两名独立审稿人评估,随机试验使用Cochrane偏倚风险2.0工具,观察性研究使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,病例系列使用Joanna Briggs研究所检查表。将对汇总的局部复发率进行荟萃分析,按不同叶状肿瘤分级和手术切缘分层。讨论:本系统综述将综合目前叶状肿瘤的最佳手术切缘及其对局部复发率的影响。这些发现旨在为临床医生提供指导,并为该领域的未来研究奠定坚实的研究基础。试验注册:PROSPERO CRD420250640098。
Local recurrence of phyllodes tumors after surgery with wide compared to narrow margins: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background: Phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial breast lesions graded as benign, borderline, or malignant. Surgical resection with clear margins is the primary method of treatment. Consensus on margin width could prevent unnecessary large primary resections or reoperations, yet the optimal margins for different tumor grades remain unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis will evaluate the effect of wide versus narrow margins on local recurrence rates after surgery for phyllodes tumors of the breast. In addition, the re-excision rates, adjuvant treatment and adverse events will be assessed.
Methods: An information specialist will assist in searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as gray literature to identify randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series. Relevant abstracts from professional society meetings and web-based registries of clinical trials will also be included via hand-search and by forward-tracking papers and by searching the reference lists of the obtained articles. Studies included will compare patients, without age limitation, who were surgically treated for a histopathologically confirmed phyllodes tumor of the breast. Studies reporting both local recurrence rate and surgical excision margins will be included. No language restriction will be applied. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the studies identified during the search using pre-defined inclusion criteria and data extraction from the full texts of selected studies will be performed. The quality of included studies will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for case series. A meta-analysis on pooled local recurrence rates will be conducted, stratified by different phyllodes tumor grades and surgical margins.
Discussion: This systematic review will provide a synthesis of current evidence on the optimal surgical margins of phyllodes tumors and its effect on local recurrence rates. These findings aim to provide clinicians with guidelines and to establish a strong research base for future studies in this field.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.