电动汽车调度与换电池站充电计划问题的双决策模型。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yong Su, Shishun Tian, Hao Wu, Xia Li
{"title":"电动汽车调度与换电池站充电计划问题的双决策模型。","authors":"Yong Su, Shishun Tian, Hao Wu, Xia Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The blooming population and advanced technology of electric vehicles (EVs) have promoted the wide studies on battery swapping station (BSS) models. However, current BSS researches only focus on isolated decision models, such as the dispatching model or charging schedule model, which cannot represent the realistic situation and obtain the optimal solution for both the EV drivers and BSS operators. In this paper, a bi-decision model for EV dispatch and BSS charging schedule problem is proposed to minimize the average extra time (ET) through the assigned BSS for EVs, and optimize the electricity cost, charging damage to batteries, and power load variance for BSSs, where the solution in the first decision is the pre-defined condition of the second decision model. Knowing that two models are both Non-deterministic Polynomial-time hard (NP-hard) problems, two types of evolutionary algorithms are proposed. In the first model, an adaptive tabu search (ATS) algorithm is proposed by formatting the EVs' ET, the number of batteries, and queuing EVs at BSSs. In the second model, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is proposed to obtain the Pareto set of the complicated scheduling problem. Experiments are carried out to investigate the viability of the bi-decision model by comparing it with rule-based strategies, such as nearest-in-range. Also, the waiting times in the first decision and the scheduling results are illustrated in the Gantt charts. Lastly, a comprehensive comparison between the proposed ATS algorithm and the MOPSO algorithm is presented to show the effectiveness and competitiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"24512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A bi-decision model for electric vehicle dispatch and battery swapping station charging schedule problem.\",\"authors\":\"Yong Su, Shishun Tian, Hao Wu, Xia Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The blooming population and advanced technology of electric vehicles (EVs) have promoted the wide studies on battery swapping station (BSS) models. However, current BSS researches only focus on isolated decision models, such as the dispatching model or charging schedule model, which cannot represent the realistic situation and obtain the optimal solution for both the EV drivers and BSS operators. In this paper, a bi-decision model for EV dispatch and BSS charging schedule problem is proposed to minimize the average extra time (ET) through the assigned BSS for EVs, and optimize the electricity cost, charging damage to batteries, and power load variance for BSSs, where the solution in the first decision is the pre-defined condition of the second decision model. Knowing that two models are both Non-deterministic Polynomial-time hard (NP-hard) problems, two types of evolutionary algorithms are proposed. In the first model, an adaptive tabu search (ATS) algorithm is proposed by formatting the EVs' ET, the number of batteries, and queuing EVs at BSSs. In the second model, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is proposed to obtain the Pareto set of the complicated scheduling problem. Experiments are carried out to investigate the viability of the bi-decision model by comparing it with rule-based strategies, such as nearest-in-range. Also, the waiting times in the first decision and the scheduling results are illustrated in the Gantt charts. Lastly, a comprehensive comparison between the proposed ATS algorithm and the MOPSO algorithm is presented to show the effectiveness and competitiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"24512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-08301-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着电动汽车人口的迅速增长和技术的不断进步,电池换热站模型的研究得到了广泛的发展。然而,目前的BSS研究只关注于孤立的决策模型,如调度模型或充电计划模型,这些模型不能代表现实情况,不能同时得到电动汽车司机和BSS运营商的最优解。本文提出了电动汽车调度和BSS充电计划问题的双决策模型,通过为电动汽车分配BSS来最小化平均额外时间(ET),并优化BSS的电力成本、充电对电池的损害和电力负荷变化,其中第一个决策的解是第二个决策模型的预定义条件。考虑到这两个模型都是非确定性多项式时间困难(NP-hard)问题,提出了两种进化算法。在第一个模型中,提出了一种自适应禁忌搜索(ATS)算法,该算法通过格式化电动汽车的ET、电池数量和在bss处排队的电动汽车。在该模型中,提出了一种多目标粒子群优化算法(MOPSO)来求解复杂调度问题的Pareto集。通过将双决策模型与基于规则的策略(如最接近范围策略)进行比较,进行了实验来研究双决策模型的可行性。在甘特图中给出了第一次决策的等待时间和调度结果。最后,将所提出的ATS算法与MOPSO算法进行了综合比较,证明了算法的有效性和竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A bi-decision model for electric vehicle dispatch and battery swapping station charging schedule problem.

The blooming population and advanced technology of electric vehicles (EVs) have promoted the wide studies on battery swapping station (BSS) models. However, current BSS researches only focus on isolated decision models, such as the dispatching model or charging schedule model, which cannot represent the realistic situation and obtain the optimal solution for both the EV drivers and BSS operators. In this paper, a bi-decision model for EV dispatch and BSS charging schedule problem is proposed to minimize the average extra time (ET) through the assigned BSS for EVs, and optimize the electricity cost, charging damage to batteries, and power load variance for BSSs, where the solution in the first decision is the pre-defined condition of the second decision model. Knowing that two models are both Non-deterministic Polynomial-time hard (NP-hard) problems, two types of evolutionary algorithms are proposed. In the first model, an adaptive tabu search (ATS) algorithm is proposed by formatting the EVs' ET, the number of batteries, and queuing EVs at BSSs. In the second model, a multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) algorithm is proposed to obtain the Pareto set of the complicated scheduling problem. Experiments are carried out to investigate the viability of the bi-decision model by comparing it with rule-based strategies, such as nearest-in-range. Also, the waiting times in the first decision and the scheduling results are illustrated in the Gantt charts. Lastly, a comprehensive comparison between the proposed ATS algorithm and the MOPSO algorithm is presented to show the effectiveness and competitiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信