24小时超循环中关键事件阶段及团队规模和绩效水平影响的探索性分析。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321944
Carlo Dindorf, Jonas Dully, Lukas Maurer, Stephan Becker, Steven Simon, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich
{"title":"24小时超循环中关键事件阶段及团队规模和绩效水平影响的探索性分析。","authors":"Carlo Dindorf, Jonas Dully, Lukas Maurer, Stephan Becker, Steven Simon, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0321944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the complex dynamics of rank-order stability by analyzing the current-to-final rank difference (CFRD), a metric that provides a dynamic view of rank fluctuations and their impact on the final ranking. This approach enables the identification of critical event phases that significantly influence the final rank. Specifically, we examine how varying team sizes and performance levels shape temporal trends in CFRD during 24-hour cycling races. A comprehensive dataset covering four consecutive years (2019-2022) of a 24-hour cycling race on a 17.9 km repetitive driven road track, encompassing diverse team sizes (solo rider, or teams of 4 and 10), is used. The results indicate significant interactions between time, team size, and performance F(18.04) = 1.74; p = 0.03). As the race progresses, the final standings become progressively more predictable. Solo riders exhibit the least clarity in their final standing throughout the race. In contrast, larger teams achieve a clearer indication of their final ranking earlier in the race. Medium-performance teams, especially solo riders, show lower clarity in their final standing across the race duration, whereas high- and low-performance teams tend to exhibit more predictable outcomes at earlier stages of the race. Overall, this study advances our understanding of endurance team cycling, and offers valuable insights for strategic decision-making and race optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0321944"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory analysis of critical event phases and the impact of team size and performance levels in 24 hour ultra cycling.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Dindorf, Jonas Dully, Lukas Maurer, Stephan Becker, Steven Simon, Eva Bartaguiz, Michael Fröhlich\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0321944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explores the complex dynamics of rank-order stability by analyzing the current-to-final rank difference (CFRD), a metric that provides a dynamic view of rank fluctuations and their impact on the final ranking. This approach enables the identification of critical event phases that significantly influence the final rank. Specifically, we examine how varying team sizes and performance levels shape temporal trends in CFRD during 24-hour cycling races. A comprehensive dataset covering four consecutive years (2019-2022) of a 24-hour cycling race on a 17.9 km repetitive driven road track, encompassing diverse team sizes (solo rider, or teams of 4 and 10), is used. The results indicate significant interactions between time, team size, and performance F(18.04) = 1.74; p = 0.03). As the race progresses, the final standings become progressively more predictable. Solo riders exhibit the least clarity in their final standing throughout the race. In contrast, larger teams achieve a clearer indication of their final ranking earlier in the race. Medium-performance teams, especially solo riders, show lower clarity in their final standing across the race duration, whereas high- and low-performance teams tend to exhibit more predictable outcomes at earlier stages of the race. Overall, this study advances our understanding of endurance team cycling, and offers valuable insights for strategic decision-making and race optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0321944\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321944\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过分析当前至最终排名差异(CFRD)来探索排名-顺序稳定性的复杂动态,CFRD是一个提供排名波动及其对最终排名影响的动态视图的指标。这种方法能够识别显著影响最终排名的关键事件阶段。具体而言,我们研究了在24小时自行车比赛中,不同的团队规模和表现水平如何影响CFRD的时间趋势。该研究使用了连续四年(2019-2022年)在17.9公里的重复驾驶公路上进行的24小时自行车赛的综合数据集,包括不同的团队规模(单人车手,或4人或10人的团队)。结果表明,时间、团队规模和绩效之间存在显著的交互作用F(18.04) = 1.74;P = 0.03)。随着比赛的进行,最终排名变得越来越容易预测。单人车手在整个比赛中表现得最不清晰。相比之下,更大的车队在比赛的早期就能更清楚地看到他们的最终排名。表现中等的车队,尤其是单打独打的车队,在整个比赛过程中,在最后的名次中表现出较低的清晰度,而表现优异和表现不佳的车队往往在比赛的早期阶段表现出更可预测的结果。总的来说,本研究促进了我们对耐力团队自行车运动的理解,并为战略决策和比赛优化提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploratory analysis of critical event phases and the impact of team size and performance levels in 24 hour ultra cycling.

This study explores the complex dynamics of rank-order stability by analyzing the current-to-final rank difference (CFRD), a metric that provides a dynamic view of rank fluctuations and their impact on the final ranking. This approach enables the identification of critical event phases that significantly influence the final rank. Specifically, we examine how varying team sizes and performance levels shape temporal trends in CFRD during 24-hour cycling races. A comprehensive dataset covering four consecutive years (2019-2022) of a 24-hour cycling race on a 17.9 km repetitive driven road track, encompassing diverse team sizes (solo rider, or teams of 4 and 10), is used. The results indicate significant interactions between time, team size, and performance F(18.04) = 1.74; p = 0.03). As the race progresses, the final standings become progressively more predictable. Solo riders exhibit the least clarity in their final standing throughout the race. In contrast, larger teams achieve a clearer indication of their final ranking earlier in the race. Medium-performance teams, especially solo riders, show lower clarity in their final standing across the race duration, whereas high- and low-performance teams tend to exhibit more predictable outcomes at earlier stages of the race. Overall, this study advances our understanding of endurance team cycling, and offers valuable insights for strategic decision-making and race optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信