有子痫前期病史的孕妇子痫前期复发的影响因素及预测模型的建立

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hui Dong, Jie Song, Yanju Jia, Hongyan Cui, Xu Chen
{"title":"有子痫前期病史的孕妇子痫前期复发的影响因素及预测模型的建立","authors":"Hui Dong, Jie Song, Yanju Jia, Hongyan Cui, Xu Chen","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish and verify the prediction model of recurrent preeclampsia (PE) in pregnant women with a history of PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally 130 pregnant women with a history of PE from Jan 2021 to Jan 2023 were selected retrospectively. The patients were randomly matched according to the proportion of 1:4 to establish a verification group (nasty 26) and a modeling group (nasty 104). The modeling patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of preeclampsia: recurrent group (nasty 50) and non-recurrent group (nasty 54). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of influencing factors was established. Calibration curve was performed to verify, decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical practicability of the prediction model, and ROC analysis was used to show the prediction value of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, gestational age, gestational interval, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure of previous pregnancy. (p<0.05) According to the results of logistic regression analysis, a prediction model was constructed. Logit(P)=(0.910Age)+(0.987Age of onset of previous pregnancy)+(1.167Gestational interval)+(1.186Systolic blood pressure in previous pregnancy)+(0.970Diastolic blood pressure in previous pregnancy).The slope of the calibration curve was close to one in the training set and verification set. The results showed that the prediction of recurrent PE risk of pregnant women with history of eclampsia was consistent with the actual risk. ROC analysis showed that the area under curve was 0.991. The results of DCA analysis showed that the model had good clinical practicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a prediction model is successfully established and verified according to the influencing factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing recurrence of preeclampsia in pregnant women with a history of preeclampsia and the establishment of a predictive model.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Dong, Jie Song, Yanju Jia, Hongyan Cui, Xu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2024-0539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To establish and verify the prediction model of recurrent preeclampsia (PE) in pregnant women with a history of PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Totally 130 pregnant women with a history of PE from Jan 2021 to Jan 2023 were selected retrospectively. The patients were randomly matched according to the proportion of 1:4 to establish a verification group (nasty 26) and a modeling group (nasty 104). The modeling patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of preeclampsia: recurrent group (nasty 50) and non-recurrent group (nasty 54). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of influencing factors was established. Calibration curve was performed to verify, decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical practicability of the prediction model, and ROC analysis was used to show the prediction value of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, gestational age, gestational interval, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure of previous pregnancy. (p<0.05) According to the results of logistic regression analysis, a prediction model was constructed. Logit(P)=(0.910Age)+(0.987Age of onset of previous pregnancy)+(1.167Gestational interval)+(1.186Systolic blood pressure in previous pregnancy)+(0.970Diastolic blood pressure in previous pregnancy).The slope of the calibration curve was close to one in the training set and verification set. The results showed that the prediction of recurrent PE risk of pregnant women with history of eclampsia was consistent with the actual risk. ROC analysis showed that the area under curve was 0.991. The results of DCA analysis showed that the model had good clinical practicability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, a prediction model is successfully established and verified according to the influencing factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0539\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立并验证有PE病史孕妇子痫前期复发的预测模型。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年1月有PE病史的孕妇130例。按1:4的比例随机配对,建立验证组(26只)和建模组(104只)。根据子痫前期发生情况将造模患者分为复发组(50例)和非复发组(54例)。对影响因素进行多因素logistic回归分析。采用校正曲线进行验证,采用决策曲线分析(decision curve analysis, DCA)评价预测模型的临床实用性,采用ROC分析显示模型的预测值。结果:多因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄、胎龄、妊娠间隔、既往妊娠收缩压、舒张压差异均有统计学意义。(p)结论:本研究根据影响因素成功建立了预测模型并进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors influencing recurrence of preeclampsia in pregnant women with a history of preeclampsia and the establishment of a predictive model.

Objectives: To establish and verify the prediction model of recurrent preeclampsia (PE) in pregnant women with a history of PE.

Methods: Totally 130 pregnant women with a history of PE from Jan 2021 to Jan 2023 were selected retrospectively. The patients were randomly matched according to the proportion of 1:4 to establish a verification group (nasty 26) and a modeling group (nasty 104). The modeling patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of preeclampsia: recurrent group (nasty 50) and non-recurrent group (nasty 54). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of influencing factors was established. Calibration curve was performed to verify, decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate the clinical practicability of the prediction model, and ROC analysis was used to show the prediction value of the model.

Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, gestational age, gestational interval, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure of previous pregnancy. (p<0.05) According to the results of logistic regression analysis, a prediction model was constructed. Logit(P)=(0.910Age)+(0.987Age of onset of previous pregnancy)+(1.167Gestational interval)+(1.186Systolic blood pressure in previous pregnancy)+(0.970Diastolic blood pressure in previous pregnancy).The slope of the calibration curve was close to one in the training set and verification set. The results showed that the prediction of recurrent PE risk of pregnant women with history of eclampsia was consistent with the actual risk. ROC analysis showed that the area under curve was 0.991. The results of DCA analysis showed that the model had good clinical practicability.

Conclusions: In this study, a prediction model is successfully established and verified according to the influencing factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信