Khalid M Abdelaziz, Afnan Alayyash, Youssef A Algarni, Abdulaziz M Alshahrani, David F Murchison
{"title":"用共固化自蚀刻底漆研究金属正畸托槽对牙釉质的脱粘应力。","authors":"Khalid M Abdelaziz, Afnan Alayyash, Youssef A Algarni, Abdulaziz M Alshahrani, David F Murchison","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_130_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency of the self-etch primer co-curing protocol in retaining orthodontic brackets to tooth enamel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A self-etch orthodontic resin primer was pre-cured or co-cured together with the resin adhesive (Groups 1 and 2) to retain either non-coated or pre-coated orthodontic brackets (Subgroups 1 and 2) on the buccal surfaces of extracted premolars. The debonding shear stress values were evaluated immediately after bonding (Category 1) and after exposure to cyclic intraoral hydraulic, thermal, and mechanical stress simulations (Category 2). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also assessed for each test category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The co-cured primer provided higher immediate debonding stress values for both non- and pre-coated brackets (Tukey's, <i>P</i> < 0.05) than the pre-cured primer. However, after artificial aging and stress simulation, there was no difference in bonding values for the four test categories (Tukey's, <i>P</i> > 0.05). The delayed debonding stress values were lower than the immediately assessed values (Tukey's, <i>P</i> < 0.05) for both brackets. No difference (Mann-Whitney's, <i>P</i> > 0.05) was noticed in the ARIs of all test categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although intraoral stress simulation reduced the brackets' debonding values, co-curing the self-etch orthodontic primer may offer clinically efficient bonding of both non- and pre-coated metal brackets with minimal harm to tooth enamel on debonding.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"14 ","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debonding stresses of metal orthodontic brackets retained to tooth enamel with co-cured self-etch primer.\",\"authors\":\"Khalid M Abdelaziz, Afnan Alayyash, Youssef A Algarni, Abdulaziz M Alshahrani, David F Murchison\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jos.jos_130_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency of the self-etch primer co-curing protocol in retaining orthodontic brackets to tooth enamel.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A self-etch orthodontic resin primer was pre-cured or co-cured together with the resin adhesive (Groups 1 and 2) to retain either non-coated or pre-coated orthodontic brackets (Subgroups 1 and 2) on the buccal surfaces of extracted premolars. The debonding shear stress values were evaluated immediately after bonding (Category 1) and after exposure to cyclic intraoral hydraulic, thermal, and mechanical stress simulations (Category 2). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also assessed for each test category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The co-cured primer provided higher immediate debonding stress values for both non- and pre-coated brackets (Tukey's, <i>P</i> < 0.05) than the pre-cured primer. However, after artificial aging and stress simulation, there was no difference in bonding values for the four test categories (Tukey's, <i>P</i> > 0.05). The delayed debonding stress values were lower than the immediately assessed values (Tukey's, <i>P</i> < 0.05) for both brackets. No difference (Mann-Whitney's, <i>P</i> > 0.05) was noticed in the ARIs of all test categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although intraoral stress simulation reduced the brackets' debonding values, co-curing the self-etch orthodontic primer may offer clinically efficient bonding of both non- and pre-coated metal brackets with minimal harm to tooth enamel on debonding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237001/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthodontic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_130_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_130_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评价自蚀刻底物共固化方案在正畸托槽固定牙釉质中的效果。材料与方法:将自蚀刻正畸树脂底漆与树脂胶粘剂(第1组和第2组)一起预固化或共固化,将未涂覆或预涂覆的正畸托槽(第1组和第2组)固定在拔出的前磨牙颊面。在粘接(第1类)和暴露于循环口内水力、热和机械应力模拟(第2类)后立即评估脱粘剪切应力值。对每个测试类别进行粘着残余指数(ARI)评估。结果:共固化底物对未涂覆和预涂覆支架的即刻脱粘应力值均高于预固化底物(Tukey’s, P < 0.05)。然而,经过人工老化和应力模拟后,四个测试类别的粘结值没有差异(Tukey's, P > 0.05)。延迟脱粘应力值均低于即刻评估值(Tukey’s, P < 0.05)。各测试类别的ARIs差异无统计学意义(Mann-Whitney's, P < 0.05)。结论:虽然口腔内应力模拟降低了托槽的脱粘值,但共固化自蚀刻正畸引物可以在临床上有效地结合未涂覆和预涂覆的金属托槽,同时对牙釉质的脱粘损伤最小。
Debonding stresses of metal orthodontic brackets retained to tooth enamel with co-cured self-etch primer.
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of the self-etch primer co-curing protocol in retaining orthodontic brackets to tooth enamel.
Materials and methods: A self-etch orthodontic resin primer was pre-cured or co-cured together with the resin adhesive (Groups 1 and 2) to retain either non-coated or pre-coated orthodontic brackets (Subgroups 1 and 2) on the buccal surfaces of extracted premolars. The debonding shear stress values were evaluated immediately after bonding (Category 1) and after exposure to cyclic intraoral hydraulic, thermal, and mechanical stress simulations (Category 2). The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was also assessed for each test category.
Results: The co-cured primer provided higher immediate debonding stress values for both non- and pre-coated brackets (Tukey's, P < 0.05) than the pre-cured primer. However, after artificial aging and stress simulation, there was no difference in bonding values for the four test categories (Tukey's, P > 0.05). The delayed debonding stress values were lower than the immediately assessed values (Tukey's, P < 0.05) for both brackets. No difference (Mann-Whitney's, P > 0.05) was noticed in the ARIs of all test categories.
Conclusion: Although intraoral stress simulation reduced the brackets' debonding values, co-curing the self-etch orthodontic primer may offer clinically efficient bonding of both non- and pre-coated metal brackets with minimal harm to tooth enamel on debonding.