澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房心脏手术后出院与长期生存的关系:一项回顾性多中心队列研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Catherine Bartlett, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Ashwin Subramaniam, David Pilcher, Mahesh Ramanan
{"title":"澳大利亚和新西兰重症监护病房心脏手术后出院与长期生存的关系:一项回顾性多中心队列研究","authors":"Catherine Bartlett, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Ashwin Subramaniam, David Pilcher, Mahesh Ramanan","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nonhome discharge (NHD) after cardiac surgery has increased in Australia and New Zealand, but its effect on long-term survival is unclear. This study aimed to assess whether NHD, compared with home discharge (HD), was associated with decreased survival up to 4 years after surgery. Additional objectives included evaluating the effects of discharge location, age, surgery types, and emergency status on long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, registry-based study (2018-2023).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We included 74 intensive care units (ICUs) across Australia and New Zealand that submitted data to the Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults (≥16 years) who underwent valvular surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, or both and survived hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The study involved 92,865 patients, of whom 13,444 (14.5%) experienced NHD. NHD locations comprise rehabilitation centers, aged care facilities, mental health units, acute hospitals, and other settings. Survival up to 4 years was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. NHD was associated with reduced survival compared with HD (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-2.09), with the strongest association within the first 12 months after discharge. The association between NHD and reduced survival was notably greater for patients younger than 65 years (hazard ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-3.03) compared with those 65 years or older (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-1.89; p<sub>interaction</sub> < 0.001). No significant differences existed between the NHD locations. Survival rates after NHD, compared with HD, were lower across all included surgery types, including emergency and elective procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NHD after cardiac surgery is associated independently with decreased long-term survival, with the highest risk observed within the first year.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discharge to Nonhome Locations and Association With Long-term Survival After Cardiac Surgery in Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Bartlett, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Ashwin Subramaniam, David Pilcher, Mahesh Ramanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nonhome discharge (NHD) after cardiac surgery has increased in Australia and New Zealand, but its effect on long-term survival is unclear. This study aimed to assess whether NHD, compared with home discharge (HD), was associated with decreased survival up to 4 years after surgery. Additional objectives included evaluating the effects of discharge location, age, surgery types, and emergency status on long-term survival.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, registry-based study (2018-2023).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We included 74 intensive care units (ICUs) across Australia and New Zealand that submitted data to the Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults (≥16 years) who underwent valvular surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, or both and survived hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The study involved 92,865 patients, of whom 13,444 (14.5%) experienced NHD. NHD locations comprise rehabilitation centers, aged care facilities, mental health units, acute hospitals, and other settings. Survival up to 4 years was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. NHD was associated with reduced survival compared with HD (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-2.09), with the strongest association within the first 12 months after discharge. The association between NHD and reduced survival was notably greater for patients younger than 65 years (hazard ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-3.03) compared with those 65 years or older (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-1.89; p<sub>interaction</sub> < 0.001). No significant differences existed between the NHD locations. Survival rates after NHD, compared with HD, were lower across all included surgery types, including emergency and elective procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NHD after cardiac surgery is associated independently with decreased long-term survival, with the highest risk observed within the first year.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.06.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在澳大利亚和新西兰,心脏手术后非家庭出院(NHD)有所增加,但其对长期生存的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估NHD与家庭出院(HD)相比,是否与术后4年生存率降低相关。其他目标包括评估出院地点、年龄、手术类型和急诊状态对长期生存的影响。设计:我们进行了一项回顾性、多中心、基于登记的研究(2018-2023)。环境:我们纳入了澳大利亚和新西兰的74个重症监护病房(icu),这些icu向澳大利亚新西兰重症监护协会成人患者数据库提交了数据。参与者:接受过瓣膜手术、冠状动脉搭桥术或两者兼而有之且出院后存活的成年人(≥16岁)。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:该研究涉及92,865例患者,其中13,444例(14.5%)经历过NHD。NHD地点包括康复中心、老年护理设施、精神卫生单位、急症医院和其他设置。使用Cox比例风险模型分析4年生存率。与HD相比,NHD与生存率降低相关(风险比,1.91;95%可信区间为1.75-2.09),且在出院后的前12个月内相关性最强。对于年龄小于65岁的患者,NHD与生存率降低之间的相关性更大(风险比,2.58;95%可信区间,2.20-3.03)与65岁及以上的患者相比(风险比,1.71;95%置信区间为1.54-1.89;p交互作用< 0.001)。NHD位置之间没有显著差异。与HD相比,NHD后的生存率在所有手术类型中都较低,包括急诊和选择性手术。结论:心脏手术后NHD与长期生存率降低独立相关,第一年内观察到的风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discharge to Nonhome Locations and Association With Long-term Survival After Cardiac Surgery in Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Objectives: Nonhome discharge (NHD) after cardiac surgery has increased in Australia and New Zealand, but its effect on long-term survival is unclear. This study aimed to assess whether NHD, compared with home discharge (HD), was associated with decreased survival up to 4 years after surgery. Additional objectives included evaluating the effects of discharge location, age, surgery types, and emergency status on long-term survival.

Design: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, registry-based study (2018-2023).

Setting: We included 74 intensive care units (ICUs) across Australia and New Zealand that submitted data to the Australia New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database.

Participants: Adults (≥16 years) who underwent valvular surgery, coronary artery bypass grafting, or both and survived hospital discharge.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: The study involved 92,865 patients, of whom 13,444 (14.5%) experienced NHD. NHD locations comprise rehabilitation centers, aged care facilities, mental health units, acute hospitals, and other settings. Survival up to 4 years was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models. NHD was associated with reduced survival compared with HD (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-2.09), with the strongest association within the first 12 months after discharge. The association between NHD and reduced survival was notably greater for patients younger than 65 years (hazard ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-3.03) compared with those 65 years or older (hazard ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-1.89; pinteraction < 0.001). No significant differences existed between the NHD locations. Survival rates after NHD, compared with HD, were lower across all included surgery types, including emergency and elective procedures.

Conclusions: NHD after cardiac surgery is associated independently with decreased long-term survival, with the highest risk observed within the first year.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信