Seung Heun An, Eun Joo Kim, Sung Phil Yang, Su Ji Choi, Jun Min Lee
{"title":"亚急性脑卒中患者15和30 m 6分钟步行试验的比较信度、并发效度和收敛效度以及预测价值","authors":"Seung Heun An, Eun Joo Kim, Sung Phil Yang, Su Ji Choi, Jun Min Lee","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is used to assess gait capacity in patients with stroke; however, the standard 30-m version (6MWT-30 m) is often impractical in clinical settings because of space limitations. We investigated the validity and reliability of a 15-m version (6MWT-15 m) in 29 individuals with subacute stroke. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Validity was evaluated through correlations with the 10-m walk test (10mWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremities (FMA-LE). The 6MWT-15 m demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.997) and acceptable measurement error (MDC = 19.5 m), with strong correlations with the 10mWT, BBS, FMA-LE, and 6MWT-30 m, supporting its validity. Regression analysis identified the 6MWT-15 m as the sole significant predictor of 6MWT-30 m (R2 = 0.98) walking distance. These findings support the 6MWT-15 m as a reliable, valid, and practical alternative for assessing walking capacity in patients suffering from subacute stroke, particularly in space-limited clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative reliability, concurrent and convergent validity, and predictive value of the 6-min walk test over 15 and 30 m in patients with subacute stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Seung Heun An, Eun Joo Kim, Sung Phil Yang, Su Ji Choi, Jun Min Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is used to assess gait capacity in patients with stroke; however, the standard 30-m version (6MWT-30 m) is often impractical in clinical settings because of space limitations. We investigated the validity and reliability of a 15-m version (6MWT-15 m) in 29 individuals with subacute stroke. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Validity was evaluated through correlations with the 10-m walk test (10mWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremities (FMA-LE). The 6MWT-15 m demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.997) and acceptable measurement error (MDC = 19.5 m), with strong correlations with the 10mWT, BBS, FMA-LE, and 6MWT-30 m, supporting its validity. Regression analysis identified the 6MWT-15 m as the sole significant predictor of 6MWT-30 m (R2 = 0.98) walking distance. These findings support the 6MWT-15 m as a reliable, valid, and practical alternative for assessing walking capacity in patients suffering from subacute stroke, particularly in space-limited clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000674\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative reliability, concurrent and convergent validity, and predictive value of the 6-min walk test over 15 and 30 m in patients with subacute stroke.
The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is used to assess gait capacity in patients with stroke; however, the standard 30-m version (6MWT-30 m) is often impractical in clinical settings because of space limitations. We investigated the validity and reliability of a 15-m version (6MWT-15 m) in 29 individuals with subacute stroke. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and Bland-Altman analysis. Validity was evaluated through correlations with the 10-m walk test (10mWT), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for the Lower Extremities (FMA-LE). The 6MWT-15 m demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC = 0.997) and acceptable measurement error (MDC = 19.5 m), with strong correlations with the 10mWT, BBS, FMA-LE, and 6MWT-30 m, supporting its validity. Regression analysis identified the 6MWT-15 m as the sole significant predictor of 6MWT-30 m (R2 = 0.98) walking distance. These findings support the 6MWT-15 m as a reliable, valid, and practical alternative for assessing walking capacity in patients suffering from subacute stroke, particularly in space-limited clinical settings.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.