当直接抗球蛋白试验由于补体单独呈阳性时,酸洗脱的效用。

Q4 Medicine
Immunohematology Pub Date : 2025-07-08 Print Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.2478/immunohematology-2025-009
Beth M Meyer
{"title":"当直接抗球蛋白试验由于补体单独呈阳性时,酸洗脱的效用。","authors":"Beth M Meyer","doi":"10.2478/immunohematology-2025-009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acid elutions are intended to recover IgG antibodies from the red blood cell (RBC) surface. Eluates from samples that are direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive with complement (C3) only would be expected to be negative. However, elution studies performed on RBCs that are DAT positive with C3 only can produce clinically significant results. Identifying how often clinically relevant information is obtained when elutions are performed on samples DAT positive with C3 alone would aid in developing guidelines for elution performance on these samples and reducing performance of eluates on such samples with clinically insignificant results. Patient samples that are DAT positive with C3 only submitted over an 11.5-month period at the American Red Cross' Immunohematology Reference Laboratory locations were identified. The eluate result, serum result, transfusion history, and patient diagnosis were captured and analyzed. In total, 1171 samples that were DAT positive with C3 only were identified and, of those, 321 (27%) samples had an elution performed. A nonreactive eluate was the most common result. Alloantibodies were identified in 19 (6%) eluates. Panagglutination/autoantibodies was identified in 71 (22%) eluates. Informative eluates were identified as those eluates showing any alloantibody, regardless of serum results, or panagglutination/autoantibody present in the eluate but not concurrently present in the serum (n = 30,9%). Guidelines based on recent transfusion history, indicators of active hemolysis, and autoimmune reactivity concurrently in the serum should be implemented to identify clinically significant information and to reduce the number of uninformative elutions performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":13357,"journal":{"name":"Immunohematology","volume":"41 2","pages":"54-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The utility of an acid elution when a direct antiglobulin test is positive due to complement alone.\",\"authors\":\"Beth M Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/immunohematology-2025-009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Acid elutions are intended to recover IgG antibodies from the red blood cell (RBC) surface. Eluates from samples that are direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive with complement (C3) only would be expected to be negative. However, elution studies performed on RBCs that are DAT positive with C3 only can produce clinically significant results. Identifying how often clinically relevant information is obtained when elutions are performed on samples DAT positive with C3 alone would aid in developing guidelines for elution performance on these samples and reducing performance of eluates on such samples with clinically insignificant results. Patient samples that are DAT positive with C3 only submitted over an 11.5-month period at the American Red Cross' Immunohematology Reference Laboratory locations were identified. The eluate result, serum result, transfusion history, and patient diagnosis were captured and analyzed. In total, 1171 samples that were DAT positive with C3 only were identified and, of those, 321 (27%) samples had an elution performed. A nonreactive eluate was the most common result. Alloantibodies were identified in 19 (6%) eluates. Panagglutination/autoantibodies was identified in 71 (22%) eluates. Informative eluates were identified as those eluates showing any alloantibody, regardless of serum results, or panagglutination/autoantibody present in the eluate but not concurrently present in the serum (n = 30,9%). Guidelines based on recent transfusion history, indicators of active hemolysis, and autoimmune reactivity concurrently in the serum should be implemented to identify clinically significant information and to reduce the number of uninformative elutions performed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunohematology\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"54-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunohematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2025-009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunohematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/immunohematology-2025-009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酸洗脱用于从红细胞(RBC)表面回收IgG抗体。仅补体(C3)直接抗球蛋白试验(DAT)阳性的样品洗脱液预计为阴性。然而,仅对C3为DAT阳性的红细胞进行洗脱研究可以产生具有临床意义的结果。确定单独对C3阳性的DAT样品进行洗脱时获得临床相关信息的频率,将有助于制定这些样品的洗脱性能指南,并减少对临床结果不显著的样品的洗脱性能。仅在美国红十字会免疫血液学参考实验室提交的11.5个月的C3 DAT阳性患者样本被确定。收集并分析洗脱结果、血清结果、输血史和患者诊断。总共鉴定出1171例仅含C3的DAT阳性样本,其中321例(27%)样本进行了洗脱。非反应性洗脱液是最常见的结果。19例(6%)洗脱液中鉴定出同种抗体。71例(22%)洗脱液中检测到泛凝集/自身抗体。信息性洗脱液被鉴定为那些洗脱液显示任何同种异体抗体,无论血清结果如何,或洗脱液中存在凝血/自身抗体,但不同时存在于血清中(n = 30.9%)。应实施基于近期输血史、活动性溶血指标和血清自身免疫反应性的指南,以识别临床重要信息,并减少进行无信息洗脱的次数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The utility of an acid elution when a direct antiglobulin test is positive due to complement alone.

Acid elutions are intended to recover IgG antibodies from the red blood cell (RBC) surface. Eluates from samples that are direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positive with complement (C3) only would be expected to be negative. However, elution studies performed on RBCs that are DAT positive with C3 only can produce clinically significant results. Identifying how often clinically relevant information is obtained when elutions are performed on samples DAT positive with C3 alone would aid in developing guidelines for elution performance on these samples and reducing performance of eluates on such samples with clinically insignificant results. Patient samples that are DAT positive with C3 only submitted over an 11.5-month period at the American Red Cross' Immunohematology Reference Laboratory locations were identified. The eluate result, serum result, transfusion history, and patient diagnosis were captured and analyzed. In total, 1171 samples that were DAT positive with C3 only were identified and, of those, 321 (27%) samples had an elution performed. A nonreactive eluate was the most common result. Alloantibodies were identified in 19 (6%) eluates. Panagglutination/autoantibodies was identified in 71 (22%) eluates. Informative eluates were identified as those eluates showing any alloantibody, regardless of serum results, or panagglutination/autoantibody present in the eluate but not concurrently present in the serum (n = 30,9%). Guidelines based on recent transfusion history, indicators of active hemolysis, and autoimmune reactivity concurrently in the serum should be implemented to identify clinically significant information and to reduce the number of uninformative elutions performed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunohematology
Immunohematology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信