Tim Lange, Greta-Henrike Holtgrave, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, Burcu Babadag Savas, Diana Steinmann, Frank Bruns
{"title":"通过电话提醒提高乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者在放疗后监测实践中的依从性","authors":"Tim Lange, Greta-Henrike Holtgrave, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, Burcu Babadag Savas, Diana Steinmann, Frank Bruns","doi":"10.1155/ecc/9992797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to identify factors that influence appointment adherence in postradiotherapy surveillance (PRS) and to evaluate the impact of a telephone reminder system on improving patient adherence among breast and prostate cancer patients.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients scheduled for PRS within a period of 6 months. A total of 468 consecutive patients who were treated with breast or prostate irradiation were divided into two groups: those who attended their appointments and those who did not. Telephone reminders were used as interventions for nonattendees, with a first reminder (I1) followed by a second reminder (I2) in case of nonresponse. Data analysis included univariate and multivariable models to assess factors that affect adherence.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Out of 468 patients, 363 patients (77.6%) initially attended their scheduled appointments. The first telephone reminder increased adherence to 92.7% (434/468 patients). A second reminder further increased the attendance rate to 94.7% (443/468 patients). Marital status was a significant factor, with single individuals having more than three times the odds of nonattendance compared to married individuals. A trend toward significance was found for cigarette smoking as a possible further factor for nonattendance. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the other patient-, tumor- or treatment-related characteristics.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Telephone reminders significantly increase appointment adherence in PRS practice, with the first reminder showing the most substantial effect. Single patients have a particularly high risk of nonparticipation, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.</p>\n <p><b>Advances in Knowledge:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of telephone reminders as a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in PRS surveillance practice, particularly among the high-risk groups, such as single patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/9992797","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Adherence to Appointments in Postradiotherapy Surveillance Practice Through Telephone Reminders Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Tim Lange, Greta-Henrike Holtgrave, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, Burcu Babadag Savas, Diana Steinmann, Frank Bruns\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ecc/9992797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to identify factors that influence appointment adherence in postradiotherapy surveillance (PRS) and to evaluate the impact of a telephone reminder system on improving patient adherence among breast and prostate cancer patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients scheduled for PRS within a period of 6 months. A total of 468 consecutive patients who were treated with breast or prostate irradiation were divided into two groups: those who attended their appointments and those who did not. Telephone reminders were used as interventions for nonattendees, with a first reminder (I1) followed by a second reminder (I2) in case of nonresponse. Data analysis included univariate and multivariable models to assess factors that affect adherence.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Out of 468 patients, 363 patients (77.6%) initially attended their scheduled appointments. The first telephone reminder increased adherence to 92.7% (434/468 patients). A second reminder further increased the attendance rate to 94.7% (443/468 patients). Marital status was a significant factor, with single individuals having more than three times the odds of nonattendance compared to married individuals. A trend toward significance was found for cigarette smoking as a possible further factor for nonattendance. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the other patient-, tumor- or treatment-related characteristics.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Telephone reminders significantly increase appointment adherence in PRS practice, with the first reminder showing the most substantial effect. Single patients have a particularly high risk of nonparticipation, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.</p>\\n <p><b>Advances in Knowledge:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of telephone reminders as a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in PRS surveillance practice, particularly among the high-risk groups, such as single patients.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/9992797\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/9992797\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/9992797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving Adherence to Appointments in Postradiotherapy Surveillance Practice Through Telephone Reminders Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients
Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors that influence appointment adherence in postradiotherapy surveillance (PRS) and to evaluate the impact of a telephone reminder system on improving patient adherence among breast and prostate cancer patients.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients scheduled for PRS within a period of 6 months. A total of 468 consecutive patients who were treated with breast or prostate irradiation were divided into two groups: those who attended their appointments and those who did not. Telephone reminders were used as interventions for nonattendees, with a first reminder (I1) followed by a second reminder (I2) in case of nonresponse. Data analysis included univariate and multivariable models to assess factors that affect adherence.
Results: Out of 468 patients, 363 patients (77.6%) initially attended their scheduled appointments. The first telephone reminder increased adherence to 92.7% (434/468 patients). A second reminder further increased the attendance rate to 94.7% (443/468 patients). Marital status was a significant factor, with single individuals having more than three times the odds of nonattendance compared to married individuals. A trend toward significance was found for cigarette smoking as a possible further factor for nonattendance. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the other patient-, tumor- or treatment-related characteristics.
Conclusions: Telephone reminders significantly increase appointment adherence in PRS practice, with the first reminder showing the most substantial effect. Single patients have a particularly high risk of nonparticipation, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.
Advances in Knowledge: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of telephone reminders as a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in PRS surveillance practice, particularly among the high-risk groups, such as single patients.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care