通过电话提醒提高乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者在放疗后监测实践中的依从性

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tim Lange, Greta-Henrike Holtgrave, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, Burcu Babadag Savas, Diana Steinmann, Frank Bruns
{"title":"通过电话提醒提高乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者在放疗后监测实践中的依从性","authors":"Tim Lange,&nbsp;Greta-Henrike Holtgrave,&nbsp;Anne Caroline Knöchelmann,&nbsp;Burcu Babadag Savas,&nbsp;Diana Steinmann,&nbsp;Frank Bruns","doi":"10.1155/ecc/9992797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to identify factors that influence appointment adherence in postradiotherapy surveillance (PRS) and to evaluate the impact of a telephone reminder system on improving patient adherence among breast and prostate cancer patients.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients scheduled for PRS within a period of 6 months. A total of 468 consecutive patients who were treated with breast or prostate irradiation were divided into two groups: those who attended their appointments and those who did not. Telephone reminders were used as interventions for nonattendees, with a first reminder (I1) followed by a second reminder (I2) in case of nonresponse. Data analysis included univariate and multivariable models to assess factors that affect adherence.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Out of 468 patients, 363 patients (77.6%) initially attended their scheduled appointments. The first telephone reminder increased adherence to 92.7% (434/468 patients). A second reminder further increased the attendance rate to 94.7% (443/468 patients). Marital status was a significant factor, with single individuals having more than three times the odds of nonattendance compared to married individuals. A trend toward significance was found for cigarette smoking as a possible further factor for nonattendance. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the other patient-, tumor- or treatment-related characteristics.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Telephone reminders significantly increase appointment adherence in PRS practice, with the first reminder showing the most substantial effect. Single patients have a particularly high risk of nonparticipation, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.</p>\n <p><b>Advances in Knowledge:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of telephone reminders as a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in PRS surveillance practice, particularly among the high-risk groups, such as single patients.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/9992797","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Adherence to Appointments in Postradiotherapy Surveillance Practice Through Telephone Reminders Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients\",\"authors\":\"Tim Lange,&nbsp;Greta-Henrike Holtgrave,&nbsp;Anne Caroline Knöchelmann,&nbsp;Burcu Babadag Savas,&nbsp;Diana Steinmann,&nbsp;Frank Bruns\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/ecc/9992797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to identify factors that influence appointment adherence in postradiotherapy surveillance (PRS) and to evaluate the impact of a telephone reminder system on improving patient adherence among breast and prostate cancer patients.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients scheduled for PRS within a period of 6 months. A total of 468 consecutive patients who were treated with breast or prostate irradiation were divided into two groups: those who attended their appointments and those who did not. Telephone reminders were used as interventions for nonattendees, with a first reminder (I1) followed by a second reminder (I2) in case of nonresponse. Data analysis included univariate and multivariable models to assess factors that affect adherence.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Out of 468 patients, 363 patients (77.6%) initially attended their scheduled appointments. The first telephone reminder increased adherence to 92.7% (434/468 patients). A second reminder further increased the attendance rate to 94.7% (443/468 patients). Marital status was a significant factor, with single individuals having more than three times the odds of nonattendance compared to married individuals. A trend toward significance was found for cigarette smoking as a possible further factor for nonattendance. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the other patient-, tumor- or treatment-related characteristics.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> Telephone reminders significantly increase appointment adherence in PRS practice, with the first reminder showing the most substantial effect. Single patients have a particularly high risk of nonparticipation, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.</p>\\n <p><b>Advances in Knowledge:</b> This study demonstrates the effectiveness of telephone reminders as a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in PRS surveillance practice, particularly among the high-risk groups, such as single patients.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ecc/9992797\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/9992797\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ecc/9992797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定影响放疗后监测(PRS)中预约依从性的因素,并评估电话提醒系统对提高乳腺癌和前列腺癌患者依从性的影响。方法:回顾性横断面研究,分析6个月内计划进行PRS的患者的资料。共有468名连续接受乳腺或前列腺放射治疗的患者被分为两组:一组按时赴约,另一组没有。电话提醒被用作无参与者的干预措施,第一次提醒(I1),然后是第二次提醒(I2),以防无回应。数据分析包括单变量和多变量模型来评估影响依从性的因素。结果:在468名患者中,363名患者(77.6%)最初参加了预定的预约。第一次电话提醒使依从性增加到92.7%(434/468例)。第二次提示进一步提高了出勤率至94.7%(443/468例)。婚姻状况是一个重要因素,单身人士缺席的几率是已婚人士的三倍多。研究发现,吸烟可能是导致缺勤的另一个重要因素。两组在其他任何与患者、肿瘤或治疗相关的特征上没有发现显著差异。结论:电话提醒可显著提高预约依从性,其中第一次提醒效果最显著。单身患者不参与的风险特别高,这突出了有针对性干预措施的必要性。知识进展:本研究证明了电话提醒作为提高PRS监测实践依从性的一种具有成本效益的策略的有效性,特别是在高危人群,如单身患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Improving Adherence to Appointments in Postradiotherapy Surveillance Practice Through Telephone Reminders Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients

Improving Adherence to Appointments in Postradiotherapy Surveillance Practice Through Telephone Reminders Among Breast and Prostate Cancer Patients

Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors that influence appointment adherence in postradiotherapy surveillance (PRS) and to evaluate the impact of a telephone reminder system on improving patient adherence among breast and prostate cancer patients.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to analyze data from patients scheduled for PRS within a period of 6 months. A total of 468 consecutive patients who were treated with breast or prostate irradiation were divided into two groups: those who attended their appointments and those who did not. Telephone reminders were used as interventions for nonattendees, with a first reminder (I1) followed by a second reminder (I2) in case of nonresponse. Data analysis included univariate and multivariable models to assess factors that affect adherence.

Results: Out of 468 patients, 363 patients (77.6%) initially attended their scheduled appointments. The first telephone reminder increased adherence to 92.7% (434/468 patients). A second reminder further increased the attendance rate to 94.7% (443/468 patients). Marital status was a significant factor, with single individuals having more than three times the odds of nonattendance compared to married individuals. A trend toward significance was found for cigarette smoking as a possible further factor for nonattendance. No significant difference was found between the two groups in any of the other patient-, tumor- or treatment-related characteristics.

Conclusions: Telephone reminders significantly increase appointment adherence in PRS practice, with the first reminder showing the most substantial effect. Single patients have a particularly high risk of nonparticipation, highlighting the need for targeted interventions.

Advances in Knowledge: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of telephone reminders as a cost-effective strategy to improve adherence in PRS surveillance practice, particularly among the high-risk groups, such as single patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信