家庭照顾者对香港晚期失智症护理的预先护理计划的意见:一项质性专题内容分析研究

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Faye Chan, Kuen Lam, Derek Lai, Connie Tong, Christopher Lum, Jean Woo
{"title":"家庭照顾者对香港晚期失智症护理的预先护理计划的意见:一项质性专题内容分析研究","authors":"Faye Chan,&nbsp;Kuen Lam,&nbsp;Derek Lai,&nbsp;Connie Tong,&nbsp;Christopher Lum,&nbsp;Jean Woo","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.70983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Advance care planning (ACP) can be useful for person-centered dementia care, but it is unfamiliar in Hong Kong. Without advanced discussion of care preferences, it can add stress to family caregivers in decision-making for future care and impact patients' quality of life. The study aimed to explore family caregivers' views on ACP as well as to understand their perceived outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This qualitative study involved 23 interviews with family caregivers who attended the ACP information talks. The interviews were transcribed and then coded using a thematic content analysis framework.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Emerging themes include (1) receptive to ACP, (2) mixed emotions, (3) barriers to ACP, (4) family consensus in decision-making, and (5) benefits of ACP. Family caregivers were open to ACP when initiated by the healthcare team, particularly if patients had previously expressed a desire to forgo treatments, experienced prior crisis episodes, or had multiple hospital admissions. They found starting the conversation challenging, and local culture evaded the topic. Other barriers included the interpretation of filial expectation, building family consensus, and ACP knowledge gap. They needed to overcome internal emotional struggle and related barriers to progress the ACP process. The benefits of ACP included family cohesiveness, enhanced family communication, as well as better preparation for the patient's death, such as minimized unfinished business. For families that could not work through the barriers, the ACP process could become stagnant. Healthcare providers could play a pivotal role in facilitating ACP by addressing the ACP barriers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Healthcare professionals can encourage ACP discussion in early dementia care. ACP can raise family caregivers' expectations in end-of-life care. The ACP outcome of quality care is more important than documentation of forgoing life-sustaining treatments or advance (medical) directives. Proper training for healthcare professionals is crucial for initiating and facilitating ACP as well as upholding quality end-of-life care.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70983","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Views of Family Caregivers on Advance Care Planning in Advanced Dementia Care in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Thematic Content Analysis Study\",\"authors\":\"Faye Chan,&nbsp;Kuen Lam,&nbsp;Derek Lai,&nbsp;Connie Tong,&nbsp;Christopher Lum,&nbsp;Jean Woo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hsr2.70983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Advance care planning (ACP) can be useful for person-centered dementia care, but it is unfamiliar in Hong Kong. Without advanced discussion of care preferences, it can add stress to family caregivers in decision-making for future care and impact patients' quality of life. The study aimed to explore family caregivers' views on ACP as well as to understand their perceived outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This qualitative study involved 23 interviews with family caregivers who attended the ACP information talks. The interviews were transcribed and then coded using a thematic content analysis framework.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emerging themes include (1) receptive to ACP, (2) mixed emotions, (3) barriers to ACP, (4) family consensus in decision-making, and (5) benefits of ACP. Family caregivers were open to ACP when initiated by the healthcare team, particularly if patients had previously expressed a desire to forgo treatments, experienced prior crisis episodes, or had multiple hospital admissions. They found starting the conversation challenging, and local culture evaded the topic. Other barriers included the interpretation of filial expectation, building family consensus, and ACP knowledge gap. They needed to overcome internal emotional struggle and related barriers to progress the ACP process. The benefits of ACP included family cohesiveness, enhanced family communication, as well as better preparation for the patient's death, such as minimized unfinished business. For families that could not work through the barriers, the ACP process could become stagnant. Healthcare providers could play a pivotal role in facilitating ACP by addressing the ACP barriers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Healthcare professionals can encourage ACP discussion in early dementia care. ACP can raise family caregivers' expectations in end-of-life care. The ACP outcome of quality care is more important than documentation of forgoing life-sustaining treatments or advance (medical) directives. Proper training for healthcare professionals is crucial for initiating and facilitating ACP as well as upholding quality end-of-life care.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"volume\":\"8 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hsr2.70983\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Science Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.70983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景预先护理计划(ACP)在以人为本的痴呆症护理中是有用的,但在香港并不熟悉。如果没有对护理偏好进行深入的讨论,它可能会增加家庭护理人员对未来护理决策的压力,并影响患者的生活质量。本研究旨在探讨家庭照顾者对ACP的看法,并了解他们的感知结果。方法采用质性研究方法,对参加ACP信息讲座的家庭照顾者进行23次访谈。采访被转录,然后使用主题内容分析框架进行编码。新出现的主题包括:(1)接受ACP;(2)情绪混杂;(3)实施ACP的障碍;(4)家庭决策共识;(5)ACP的益处。当医疗团队发起ACP时,家庭护理人员对ACP持开放态度,特别是如果患者先前表达了放弃治疗的愿望,经历过先前的危机发作,或多次住院。他们发现开始对话很有挑战性,而当地文化回避了这个话题。其他障碍包括孝道期望的解读、家庭共识的建立、ACP知识差距等。他们需要克服内部情绪斗争和相关障碍,以推进非加太进程。ACP的好处包括家庭凝聚力,加强家庭沟通,以及为病人的死亡做更好的准备,例如尽量减少未完成的事情。对于那些无法克服障碍的家庭来说,非加太进程可能会停滞不前。医疗保健提供者可以通过解决ACP障碍,在促进ACP方面发挥关键作用。结论卫生保健专业人员可在早期痴呆护理中鼓励ACP讨论。ACP可以提高家庭照顾者对临终关怀的期望。质量护理的ACP结果比放弃维持生命治疗或预先(医疗)指示的文件更重要。对医疗保健专业人员进行适当的培训对于启动和促进ACP以及维护高质量的临终关怀至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Views of Family Caregivers on Advance Care Planning in Advanced Dementia Care in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Thematic Content Analysis Study

Views of Family Caregivers on Advance Care Planning in Advanced Dementia Care in Hong Kong: A Qualitative Thematic Content Analysis Study

Background

Advance care planning (ACP) can be useful for person-centered dementia care, but it is unfamiliar in Hong Kong. Without advanced discussion of care preferences, it can add stress to family caregivers in decision-making for future care and impact patients' quality of life. The study aimed to explore family caregivers' views on ACP as well as to understand their perceived outcomes.

Methods

This qualitative study involved 23 interviews with family caregivers who attended the ACP information talks. The interviews were transcribed and then coded using a thematic content analysis framework.

Results

Emerging themes include (1) receptive to ACP, (2) mixed emotions, (3) barriers to ACP, (4) family consensus in decision-making, and (5) benefits of ACP. Family caregivers were open to ACP when initiated by the healthcare team, particularly if patients had previously expressed a desire to forgo treatments, experienced prior crisis episodes, or had multiple hospital admissions. They found starting the conversation challenging, and local culture evaded the topic. Other barriers included the interpretation of filial expectation, building family consensus, and ACP knowledge gap. They needed to overcome internal emotional struggle and related barriers to progress the ACP process. The benefits of ACP included family cohesiveness, enhanced family communication, as well as better preparation for the patient's death, such as minimized unfinished business. For families that could not work through the barriers, the ACP process could become stagnant. Healthcare providers could play a pivotal role in facilitating ACP by addressing the ACP barriers.

Conclusions

Healthcare professionals can encourage ACP discussion in early dementia care. ACP can raise family caregivers' expectations in end-of-life care. The ACP outcome of quality care is more important than documentation of forgoing life-sustaining treatments or advance (medical) directives. Proper training for healthcare professionals is crucial for initiating and facilitating ACP as well as upholding quality end-of-life care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Science Reports
Health Science Reports Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信