Li-Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Scott Albert, Timothy J. Carroll
{"title":"时间改变感觉运动适应中由感觉预测错误和任务错误驱动的不同记忆","authors":"Li-Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Scott Albert, Timothy J. Carroll","doi":"10.1111/ejn.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prior learning can impair future learning when the requirements of the two memories conflict, a phenomenon termed anterograde interference. In sensorimotor adaptation, the passage of time between initial and future learning can reduce such interference effects, leading to the interpretation that time consolidates motor memories, protecting motor memories from interference. However, we still do not fully understand how time affects learning, as some studies found no effects of time on interference. One possible explanation for such inconclusive findings is that time has distinct effects on the multiple processes underpinning sensorimotor adaptation, and these processes may compensate for each other's effects on behaviour. Here, we used task manipulations that (1) dissociate adaptation processes driven by task errors from adaptation processes driven by sensory prediction errors and (2) separate the task-error driven adaptation processes into a flexible component that could not be acquired under time–pressure from a less flexible component that could be acquired under time–pressure. Consistent with interpretations from early reports, we found that the passage of time reduced anterograde interference effects in the adaptation component driven by sensory prediction errors. The passage of time between initial and subsequent learning also enhanced components of adaptation driven by task error: enhancing both the flexible, time-consuming component and the inflexible, time-efficient component driven by task errors. Thus, we provide evidence that multiple components of sensorimotor adaptation are sensitive to the passage of time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11993,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70196","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Alters Distinct Memories Driven by Sensory Prediction Errors and Task Errors in Sensorimotor Adaptation\",\"authors\":\"Li-Ann Leow, Welber Marinovic, Scott Albert, Timothy J. Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejn.70196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Prior learning can impair future learning when the requirements of the two memories conflict, a phenomenon termed anterograde interference. In sensorimotor adaptation, the passage of time between initial and future learning can reduce such interference effects, leading to the interpretation that time consolidates motor memories, protecting motor memories from interference. However, we still do not fully understand how time affects learning, as some studies found no effects of time on interference. One possible explanation for such inconclusive findings is that time has distinct effects on the multiple processes underpinning sensorimotor adaptation, and these processes may compensate for each other's effects on behaviour. Here, we used task manipulations that (1) dissociate adaptation processes driven by task errors from adaptation processes driven by sensory prediction errors and (2) separate the task-error driven adaptation processes into a flexible component that could not be acquired under time–pressure from a less flexible component that could be acquired under time–pressure. Consistent with interpretations from early reports, we found that the passage of time reduced anterograde interference effects in the adaptation component driven by sensory prediction errors. The passage of time between initial and subsequent learning also enhanced components of adaptation driven by task error: enhancing both the flexible, time-consuming component and the inflexible, time-efficient component driven by task errors. Thus, we provide evidence that multiple components of sensorimotor adaptation are sensitive to the passage of time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejn.70196\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejn.70196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Time Alters Distinct Memories Driven by Sensory Prediction Errors and Task Errors in Sensorimotor Adaptation
Prior learning can impair future learning when the requirements of the two memories conflict, a phenomenon termed anterograde interference. In sensorimotor adaptation, the passage of time between initial and future learning can reduce such interference effects, leading to the interpretation that time consolidates motor memories, protecting motor memories from interference. However, we still do not fully understand how time affects learning, as some studies found no effects of time on interference. One possible explanation for such inconclusive findings is that time has distinct effects on the multiple processes underpinning sensorimotor adaptation, and these processes may compensate for each other's effects on behaviour. Here, we used task manipulations that (1) dissociate adaptation processes driven by task errors from adaptation processes driven by sensory prediction errors and (2) separate the task-error driven adaptation processes into a flexible component that could not be acquired under time–pressure from a less flexible component that could be acquired under time–pressure. Consistent with interpretations from early reports, we found that the passage of time reduced anterograde interference effects in the adaptation component driven by sensory prediction errors. The passage of time between initial and subsequent learning also enhanced components of adaptation driven by task error: enhancing both the flexible, time-consuming component and the inflexible, time-efficient component driven by task errors. Thus, we provide evidence that multiple components of sensorimotor adaptation are sensitive to the passage of time.
期刊介绍:
EJN is the journal of FENS and supports the international neuroscientific community by publishing original high quality research articles and reviews in all fields of neuroscience. In addition, to engage with issues that are of interest to the science community, we also publish Editorials, Meetings Reports and Neuro-Opinions on topics that are of current interest in the fields of neuroscience research and training in science. We have recently established a series of ‘Profiles of Women in Neuroscience’. Our goal is to provide a vehicle for publications that further the understanding of the structure and function of the nervous system in both health and disease and to provide a vehicle to engage the neuroscience community. As the official journal of FENS, profits from the journal are re-invested in the neuroscientific community through the activities of FENS.