成年家庭成员精神科住院的家庭经验与观点:质性系统回顾

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Jane Karpa, Amanda Kenny, Andrea Thomson, Marian Ramage, Monica Ginn Forsyth, Kendra Rieger
{"title":"成年家庭成员精神科住院的家庭经验与观点:质性系统回顾","authors":"Jane Karpa,&nbsp;Amanda Kenny,&nbsp;Andrea Thomson,&nbsp;Marian Ramage,&nbsp;Monica Ginn Forsyth,&nbsp;Kendra Rieger","doi":"10.1111/inm.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Families who encounter the hospitalisation of an adult family member for a serious mental illness are frequently excluded from treatment and care planning. It has been established that family involvement is beneficial and positively impacts health outcomes; however, health systems continue to constrain collaborative practices. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to explore families' views of their experiences of psychiatric hospitalisation of their adult family member and the barriers and benefits for the uptake and delivery of collaborative relationships between mental health clinicians, families, family carers, and consumers. In September 2022, systematic searches were conducted for primary studies in: CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, and dissertations in ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global. The searches were updated February and September 2024. Retrieved articles were managed in Covidence and screened by three reviewers at the title and abstract and full text stages. Following screening, a total of 27 articles formed the review dataset. Study quality was assessed using the well validated Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Three themes emerged from the review: (1) Impenetrable System—‘<i>Expert-itis’</i>; (2) Perpetuating Family Invisibility; and (3) Unlocking the Door. Evidence consistently described participants' experiences of inhumane professional attitudes and practices in hospital mental health services. Further research on the types of interventions and communication strategies to promote family engagement and involvement in mental health service design and delivery is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14007,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70042","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and Perspectives of Families of Psychiatric Hospitalisation of Their Adult Family Member: A Qualitative Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Jane Karpa,&nbsp;Amanda Kenny,&nbsp;Andrea Thomson,&nbsp;Marian Ramage,&nbsp;Monica Ginn Forsyth,&nbsp;Kendra Rieger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/inm.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Families who encounter the hospitalisation of an adult family member for a serious mental illness are frequently excluded from treatment and care planning. It has been established that family involvement is beneficial and positively impacts health outcomes; however, health systems continue to constrain collaborative practices. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to explore families' views of their experiences of psychiatric hospitalisation of their adult family member and the barriers and benefits for the uptake and delivery of collaborative relationships between mental health clinicians, families, family carers, and consumers. In September 2022, systematic searches were conducted for primary studies in: CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, and dissertations in ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global. The searches were updated February and September 2024. Retrieved articles were managed in Covidence and screened by three reviewers at the title and abstract and full text stages. Following screening, a total of 27 articles formed the review dataset. Study quality was assessed using the well validated Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Three themes emerged from the review: (1) Impenetrable System—‘<i>Expert-itis’</i>; (2) Perpetuating Family Invisibility; and (3) Unlocking the Door. Evidence consistently described participants' experiences of inhumane professional attitudes and practices in hospital mental health services. Further research on the types of interventions and communication strategies to promote family engagement and involvement in mental health service design and delivery is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/inm.70042\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70042\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/inm.70042","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遇到成年家庭成员因严重精神疾病住院的家庭往往被排除在治疗和护理计划之外。已经确定,家庭参与是有益的,并对健康结果产生积极影响;然而,卫生系统继续限制合作做法。本定性系统回顾的目的是探讨家庭对其成年家庭成员的精神病学住院经历的看法,以及心理健康临床医生、家庭、家庭护理人员和消费者之间协作关系的吸收和交付的障碍和益处。2022年9月,系统检索了CINAHL、PsycInfo、PubMed、Web of Science中的初级研究,以及ProQuest Dissertation和Theses Global中的论文。搜索更新于2024年2月和9月。检索到的文章在covid中进行管理,并由三位审稿人在标题、摘要和全文阶段进行筛选。经过筛选,共有27篇文章形成综述数据集。研究质量评估使用有效的关键评估技能程序检查表。审查产生了三个主题:(1)难以穿透的系统-“专家主义”;(2)家族隐形化;(3)开锁。证据一致地描述了参与者在医院精神卫生服务中所经历的非人道的专业态度和做法。需要进一步研究干预措施和沟通策略的类型,以促进家庭参与和参与精神卫生服务的设计和提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experiences and Perspectives of Families of Psychiatric Hospitalisation of Their Adult Family Member: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Experiences and Perspectives of Families of Psychiatric Hospitalisation of Their Adult Family Member: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Families who encounter the hospitalisation of an adult family member for a serious mental illness are frequently excluded from treatment and care planning. It has been established that family involvement is beneficial and positively impacts health outcomes; however, health systems continue to constrain collaborative practices. The aim of this qualitative systematic review was to explore families' views of their experiences of psychiatric hospitalisation of their adult family member and the barriers and benefits for the uptake and delivery of collaborative relationships between mental health clinicians, families, family carers, and consumers. In September 2022, systematic searches were conducted for primary studies in: CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, Web of Science, and dissertations in ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Global. The searches were updated February and September 2024. Retrieved articles were managed in Covidence and screened by three reviewers at the title and abstract and full text stages. Following screening, a total of 27 articles formed the review dataset. Study quality was assessed using the well validated Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Three themes emerged from the review: (1) Impenetrable System—‘Expert-itis’; (2) Perpetuating Family Invisibility; and (3) Unlocking the Door. Evidence consistently described participants' experiences of inhumane professional attitudes and practices in hospital mental health services. Further research on the types of interventions and communication strategies to promote family engagement and involvement in mental health service design and delivery is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.90%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing is the official journal of the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc. It is a fully refereed journal that examines current trends and developments in mental health practice and research. The International Journal of Mental Health Nursing provides a forum for the exchange of ideas on all issues of relevance to mental health nursing. The Journal informs you of developments in mental health nursing practice and research, directions in education and training, professional issues, management approaches, policy development, ethical questions, theoretical inquiry, and clinical issues. The Journal publishes feature articles, review articles, clinical notes, research notes and book reviews. Contributions on any aspect of mental health nursing are welcomed. Statements and opinions expressed in the journal reflect the views of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信