fMRI血流动力学响应函数的最小相位特性及其对格兰杰因果关系的影响

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Leonardo Novelli, Lionel Barnett, Anil K. Seth, Adeel Razi
{"title":"fMRI血流动力学响应函数的最小相位特性及其对格兰杰因果关系的影响","authors":"Leonardo Novelli,&nbsp;Lionel Barnett,&nbsp;Anil K. Seth,&nbsp;Adeel Razi","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Granger causality (GC) is widely used in neuroimaging to estimate directed statistical dependence between brain regions using time series of brain activity. A known problem is that fMRI measures brain activity indirectly via the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which can distort GC estimates by introducing different time-to-peak responses across brain regions. However, how these distortions affect the validity of inferred connections is not fully understood. Previous studies have shown that false positives are not introduced if the haemodynamic response function (HRF) is minimum-phase; but whether the HRF is actually minimum-phase has remained contentious. Here, we address this issue by studying the transfer functions of three realistic biophysical models. We find that the minimum-phase condition is met for a wide range of physiologically plausible parameter values. Therefore, statistical testing of GC can be viable even if the HRF varies across brain regions, with the following two limitations. First, the minimum-phase condition is violated for parameter combinations that generate an initial dip in the HRF. Second, slow sampling of the BOLD signal (seconds) compared to the timescales of neural signal propagation (milliseconds) may still introduce spurious GC inferences. Beyond GC analysis, the closed-form expressions for the transfer functions of these popular HRF models are valuable for modeling fMRI time series since they balance mathematical tractability with biological plausibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimum-Phase Property of the Hemodynamic Response Function, and Implications for Granger Causality in fMRI\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Novelli,&nbsp;Lionel Barnett,&nbsp;Anil K. Seth,&nbsp;Adeel Razi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Granger causality (GC) is widely used in neuroimaging to estimate directed statistical dependence between brain regions using time series of brain activity. A known problem is that fMRI measures brain activity indirectly via the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which can distort GC estimates by introducing different time-to-peak responses across brain regions. However, how these distortions affect the validity of inferred connections is not fully understood. Previous studies have shown that false positives are not introduced if the haemodynamic response function (HRF) is minimum-phase; but whether the HRF is actually minimum-phase has remained contentious. Here, we address this issue by studying the transfer functions of three realistic biophysical models. We find that the minimum-phase condition is met for a wide range of physiologically plausible parameter values. Therefore, statistical testing of GC can be viable even if the HRF varies across brain regions, with the following two limitations. First, the minimum-phase condition is violated for parameter combinations that generate an initial dip in the HRF. Second, slow sampling of the BOLD signal (seconds) compared to the timescales of neural signal propagation (milliseconds) may still introduce spurious GC inferences. Beyond GC analysis, the closed-form expressions for the transfer functions of these popular HRF models are valuable for modeling fMRI time series since they balance mathematical tractability with biological plausibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70285\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70285\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70285","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

格兰杰因果关系(Granger causality, GC)被广泛应用于神经影像学,利用大脑活动的时间序列来估计大脑区域之间的直接统计依赖性。一个已知的问题是,fMRI通过血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号间接测量大脑活动,这可能会通过在大脑区域引入不同的峰值时间反应来扭曲GC估计。然而,这些扭曲如何影响推断连接的有效性还没有完全理解。先前的研究表明,如果血流动力学反应函数(HRF)为最小期,则不会引入假阳性;但HRF是否真的是最低阶段仍有争议。在这里,我们通过研究三个现实生物物理模型的传递函数来解决这个问题。我们发现,对于生理上合理的参数值范围很广,最小相位条件是满足的。因此,即使脑区HRF不同,GC的统计测试也是可行的,但有以下两个限制。首先,对于产生HRF初始倾角的参数组合,违反了最小相位条件。其次,与神经信号传播的时间尺度(毫秒)相比,BOLD信号的慢采样(秒)可能仍然会引入虚假的GC推断。除了GC分析,这些流行的HRF模型的传递函数的封闭形式表达式对于fMRI时间序列建模很有价值,因为它们平衡了数学上的可追踪性和生物学上的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Minimum-Phase Property of the Hemodynamic Response Function, and Implications for Granger Causality in fMRI

Minimum-Phase Property of the Hemodynamic Response Function, and Implications for Granger Causality in fMRI

Granger causality (GC) is widely used in neuroimaging to estimate directed statistical dependence between brain regions using time series of brain activity. A known problem is that fMRI measures brain activity indirectly via the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal, which can distort GC estimates by introducing different time-to-peak responses across brain regions. However, how these distortions affect the validity of inferred connections is not fully understood. Previous studies have shown that false positives are not introduced if the haemodynamic response function (HRF) is minimum-phase; but whether the HRF is actually minimum-phase has remained contentious. Here, we address this issue by studying the transfer functions of three realistic biophysical models. We find that the minimum-phase condition is met for a wide range of physiologically plausible parameter values. Therefore, statistical testing of GC can be viable even if the HRF varies across brain regions, with the following two limitations. First, the minimum-phase condition is violated for parameter combinations that generate an initial dip in the HRF. Second, slow sampling of the BOLD signal (seconds) compared to the timescales of neural signal propagation (milliseconds) may still introduce spurious GC inferences. Beyond GC analysis, the closed-form expressions for the transfer functions of these popular HRF models are valuable for modeling fMRI time series since they balance mathematical tractability with biological plausibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信