在加拿大最大的综合癌症中心检查转介到癌症康复模式和预测因素的病例对照研究

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1002/cam4.71046
Jennifer M. Jones, Rogih Andrawes, Michelle A. Weller, Adrienne Lam, Gilla K. Shapiro, Madeline Li, Danielle Rodin, Lisa Avery
{"title":"在加拿大最大的综合癌症中心检查转介到癌症康复模式和预测因素的病例对照研究","authors":"Jennifer M. Jones,&nbsp;Rogih Andrawes,&nbsp;Michelle A. Weller,&nbsp;Adrienne Lam,&nbsp;Gilla K. Shapiro,&nbsp;Madeline Li,&nbsp;Danielle Rodin,&nbsp;Lisa Avery","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer rehabilitation has become increasingly relevant as the number of cancer survivors grows, coupled with the high-documented rates of adverse effects and related disability. Cancer rehabilitation can reduce functional limitations among cancer survivors and enhance their well-being. However, only a small proportion of individuals are referred to rehabilitation services. To identify and address disparities and foster access, it is essential to develop a better understanding of the factors that drive referral to cancer rehabilitation services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to: (1) describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and symptom burden of patients who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship (CRS) Program between 2017 and 2019 and (2) Compare these variables between patients who were referred to CRS (<i>n</i> = 2783) and matched cases who were not referred over this period (<i>n</i> = 18,434). A retrospective secondary analysis of data extracted from the Princess Margaret (PM) Cancer Registry, electronic patient records, and patient-reported outcome data (PROMs) (including ESAS-r and ECOG status) was performed. Summary statistics were used to describe the patients referred to the CRS program. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify factors associated with likelihood of referral.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most referred patients were female (74%), English speakers (93%) and half lived within 15 km of the referred hospital. The most common reasons for referral were musculoskeletal impairment (26%) and lymphedema (25.4%). Many patients (45%) had multiple reasons for referral. Several key predictors of referral were identified including closer distance to hospital, lower age (&lt; 65 years), cancer site, and completion of PROMs. For those who completed PROMs, patient reported function status and pain scores were related to referral.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings can be helpful in optimizing the referral processes and addressing disparities regarding access to cancer rehabilitation. Solutions are likely multifaceted including health care provider and patient education and systemic changes to address barriers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71046","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Case Control Study Examining the Patterns and Predictors of Referral to Cancer Rehabilitation at Canada's Largest Comprehensive Cancer Centre\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M. Jones,&nbsp;Rogih Andrawes,&nbsp;Michelle A. Weller,&nbsp;Adrienne Lam,&nbsp;Gilla K. Shapiro,&nbsp;Madeline Li,&nbsp;Danielle Rodin,&nbsp;Lisa Avery\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.71046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cancer rehabilitation has become increasingly relevant as the number of cancer survivors grows, coupled with the high-documented rates of adverse effects and related disability. Cancer rehabilitation can reduce functional limitations among cancer survivors and enhance their well-being. However, only a small proportion of individuals are referred to rehabilitation services. To identify and address disparities and foster access, it is essential to develop a better understanding of the factors that drive referral to cancer rehabilitation services.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The purpose of this study was to: (1) describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and symptom burden of patients who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship (CRS) Program between 2017 and 2019 and (2) Compare these variables between patients who were referred to CRS (<i>n</i> = 2783) and matched cases who were not referred over this period (<i>n</i> = 18,434). A retrospective secondary analysis of data extracted from the Princess Margaret (PM) Cancer Registry, electronic patient records, and patient-reported outcome data (PROMs) (including ESAS-r and ECOG status) was performed. Summary statistics were used to describe the patients referred to the CRS program. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify factors associated with likelihood of referral.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Most referred patients were female (74%), English speakers (93%) and half lived within 15 km of the referred hospital. The most common reasons for referral were musculoskeletal impairment (26%) and lymphedema (25.4%). Many patients (45%) had multiple reasons for referral. Several key predictors of referral were identified including closer distance to hospital, lower age (&lt; 65 years), cancer site, and completion of PROMs. For those who completed PROMs, patient reported function status and pain scores were related to referral.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The findings can be helpful in optimizing the referral processes and addressing disparities regarding access to cancer rehabilitation. Solutions are likely multifaceted including health care provider and patient education and systemic changes to address barriers.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71046\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着癌症幸存者人数的增加,以及不良反应和相关残疾的高记录率,癌症康复变得越来越重要。癌症康复可以减少癌症幸存者的功能限制,提高他们的幸福感。然而,只有一小部分人被转介到康复服务机构。为了确定和解决差距并促进获得,必须更好地了解推动转诊到癌症康复服务的因素。方法本研究的目的是:(1)描述2017年至2019年期间转介到玛格丽特公主癌症康复与生存(CRS)计划的患者的社会人口学、临床特征和症状负担;(2)比较转介到CRS的患者(n = 2783)和同期未转介的匹配病例(n = 18434)之间的这些变量。对从玛格丽特公主癌症登记处、电子病历和患者报告的结果数据(包括ESAS-r和ECOG状态)提取的数据进行回顾性二次分析。采用汇总统计来描述纳入CRS计划的患者。采用多变量logistic回归模型确定与转诊可能性相关的因素。结果大多数转诊患者为女性(74%),以英语为母语(93%),半数患者居住在距转诊医院15公里范围内。最常见的转诊原因是肌肉骨骼损伤(26%)和淋巴水肿(25.4%)。许多患者(45%)有多种转诊原因。确定了几个关键的转诊预测因素,包括离医院较近、年龄较低(65岁)、癌症部位和完成PROMs。对于完成PROMs的患者,患者报告的功能状态和疼痛评分与转诊有关。结论该研究结果有助于优化转诊流程,解决癌症康复治疗的可及性差异。解决方案可能是多方面的,包括卫生保健提供者和患者教育以及解决障碍的系统性变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Case Control Study Examining the Patterns and Predictors of Referral to Cancer Rehabilitation at Canada's Largest Comprehensive Cancer Centre

A Case Control Study Examining the Patterns and Predictors of Referral to Cancer Rehabilitation at Canada's Largest Comprehensive Cancer Centre

Background

Cancer rehabilitation has become increasingly relevant as the number of cancer survivors grows, coupled with the high-documented rates of adverse effects and related disability. Cancer rehabilitation can reduce functional limitations among cancer survivors and enhance their well-being. However, only a small proportion of individuals are referred to rehabilitation services. To identify and address disparities and foster access, it is essential to develop a better understanding of the factors that drive referral to cancer rehabilitation services.

Methods

The purpose of this study was to: (1) describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and symptom burden of patients who were referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Rehabilitation and Survivorship (CRS) Program between 2017 and 2019 and (2) Compare these variables between patients who were referred to CRS (n = 2783) and matched cases who were not referred over this period (n = 18,434). A retrospective secondary analysis of data extracted from the Princess Margaret (PM) Cancer Registry, electronic patient records, and patient-reported outcome data (PROMs) (including ESAS-r and ECOG status) was performed. Summary statistics were used to describe the patients referred to the CRS program. Multivariable logistic regression modelling was used to identify factors associated with likelihood of referral.

Results

Most referred patients were female (74%), English speakers (93%) and half lived within 15 km of the referred hospital. The most common reasons for referral were musculoskeletal impairment (26%) and lymphedema (25.4%). Many patients (45%) had multiple reasons for referral. Several key predictors of referral were identified including closer distance to hospital, lower age (< 65 years), cancer site, and completion of PROMs. For those who completed PROMs, patient reported function status and pain scores were related to referral.

Conclusion

The findings can be helpful in optimizing the referral processes and addressing disparities regarding access to cancer rehabilitation. Solutions are likely multifaceted including health care provider and patient education and systemic changes to address barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信