{"title":"区域社会经济劣势与非小细胞肺癌患者免疫治疗的关系","authors":"Hiroe Suzuki-Chiba, Atsushi Miyawaki, Taiki Hakozaki, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Recent advances in immunotherapy have improved the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the association between patient socioeconomic status (SES) and the use of immunotherapy remain scarce. We examined the association between area-level SES and immunotherapy use in patients with stage IV NSCLC in Japan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data from a national inpatient database were used for this analysis. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, hospitalized for stage IV NSCLC, and treated with immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, and platinum-based chemotherapy alone as first-line pharmacotherapy from April 2016 to March 2022 were analyzed. Area-level SES was measured using the area deprivation index and categorized into quartiles. The primary outcome was the use of immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. A multivariate linear regression model was used, adjusted for patient characteristics, years, and hospital fixed effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 47,291 eligible patients from 843 hospitals, with 22,205 (47%) receiving immunotherapy. Adjusted analyses showed that patients in the most disadvantaged area were less likely to receive immunotherapy compared with those in the least disadvantaged area (adjusted difference, −2.0 percentage points [pp]; 95% confidence interval, −3.6 to −0.5 pp; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Although not significant, this trend persisted when stratified by urban and cancer-designated hospitals. However, this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for hospital fixed effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In Japan, with universal public health insurance with low out-of-pocket costs, living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area is associated with lower rates of immunotherapy use among patients with stage IV NSCLC. These disparities disappeared within the same hospitals using hospital fixed effects; however, such disparities tended to persist in urban, non-academic, and cancer-designated hospitals. These findings suggest the need for interventions to address the structural barriers, including those within the hospitals, to optimize NSCLC treatment and reduce health disparities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Area-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Hiroe Suzuki-Chiba, Atsushi Miyawaki, Taiki Hakozaki, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cam4.71038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recent advances in immunotherapy have improved the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the association between patient socioeconomic status (SES) and the use of immunotherapy remain scarce. We examined the association between area-level SES and immunotherapy use in patients with stage IV NSCLC in Japan.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data from a national inpatient database were used for this analysis. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, hospitalized for stage IV NSCLC, and treated with immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, and platinum-based chemotherapy alone as first-line pharmacotherapy from April 2016 to March 2022 were analyzed. Area-level SES was measured using the area deprivation index and categorized into quartiles. The primary outcome was the use of immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. A multivariate linear regression model was used, adjusted for patient characteristics, years, and hospital fixed effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 47,291 eligible patients from 843 hospitals, with 22,205 (47%) receiving immunotherapy. Adjusted analyses showed that patients in the most disadvantaged area were less likely to receive immunotherapy compared with those in the least disadvantaged area (adjusted difference, −2.0 percentage points [pp]; 95% confidence interval, −3.6 to −0.5 pp; <i>p</i> = 0.01). Although not significant, this trend persisted when stratified by urban and cancer-designated hospitals. However, this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for hospital fixed effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In Japan, with universal public health insurance with low out-of-pocket costs, living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area is associated with lower rates of immunotherapy use among patients with stage IV NSCLC. These disparities disappeared within the same hospitals using hospital fixed effects; however, such disparities tended to persist in urban, non-academic, and cancer-designated hospitals. These findings suggest the need for interventions to address the structural barriers, including those within the hospitals, to optimize NSCLC treatment and reduce health disparities.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71038\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71038\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association Between Area-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Background
Recent advances in immunotherapy have improved the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the association between patient socioeconomic status (SES) and the use of immunotherapy remain scarce. We examined the association between area-level SES and immunotherapy use in patients with stage IV NSCLC in Japan.
Methods
Data from a national inpatient database were used for this analysis. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, hospitalized for stage IV NSCLC, and treated with immunotherapy alone, immunotherapy combined with platinum-based chemotherapy, and platinum-based chemotherapy alone as first-line pharmacotherapy from April 2016 to March 2022 were analyzed. Area-level SES was measured using the area deprivation index and categorized into quartiles. The primary outcome was the use of immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. A multivariate linear regression model was used, adjusted for patient characteristics, years, and hospital fixed effects.
Results
A total of 47,291 eligible patients from 843 hospitals, with 22,205 (47%) receiving immunotherapy. Adjusted analyses showed that patients in the most disadvantaged area were less likely to receive immunotherapy compared with those in the least disadvantaged area (adjusted difference, −2.0 percentage points [pp]; 95% confidence interval, −3.6 to −0.5 pp; p = 0.01). Although not significant, this trend persisted when stratified by urban and cancer-designated hospitals. However, this difference was no longer significant after adjusting for hospital fixed effects.
Conclusion
In Japan, with universal public health insurance with low out-of-pocket costs, living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area is associated with lower rates of immunotherapy use among patients with stage IV NSCLC. These disparities disappeared within the same hospitals using hospital fixed effects; however, such disparities tended to persist in urban, non-academic, and cancer-designated hospitals. These findings suggest the need for interventions to address the structural barriers, including those within the hospitals, to optimize NSCLC treatment and reduce health disparities.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas:
Clinical Cancer Research
Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations
Cancer Biology:
Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery.
Cancer Prevention:
Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach.
Bioinformatics:
Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers.
Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.