全球电离层热层模式与HIWIND测量值的比较

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
A. J. Ridley, A. Alhothali
{"title":"全球电离层热层模式与HIWIND测量值的比较","authors":"A. J. Ridley,&nbsp;A. Alhothali","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Neutral winds in the daytime middle thermosphere are difficult to measure. The High altitude Interferometer WIND Observation instrument made measurements of these winds from a balloon in the summers of 2011 and 2018 during both daytime and nighttime at high latitudes. This paper presents a study comparing HIWIND neutral winds to global ionosphere thermosphere model (GITM) results. The meridional winds from GITM matched the trends and magnitude of the measurements of HIWIND, while the zonal winds showed much more disagreement in general. However, there existed a strong shear in the GITM results. When results from ±5° latitude were considered, they mostly bound the zonal HIWIND measurements. This study showed that: (a) HIWIND was on the edge of the high-latitude convection region where strong shears in the zonal flow occurred. Placement of the ion drifts and the aurora are important in determining the neutral winds in this region. GITM simulations using idealized drivers showed very different results. (b) On three of the 4 days, GITM's dawn region winds didn't match the HIWIND or GOCE wind measurements. These indicate that the placement of the aurora and ion drifts may be incorrect, or GITM's balance between acceleration terms could be off. (c) Viscosity and gradient in pressure accelerations were dominant, but mostly opposite. Ion drag and Coriolis were smaller, but are important, especially when the other two terms cancel each other. Specification of high-latitude drivers (i.e., the electric potential and auroral precipitation) are critically important to modeling the thermospheric winds.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":"130 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033521","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparisons Between the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model and HIWIND Measurements\",\"authors\":\"A. J. Ridley,&nbsp;A. Alhothali\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JA033521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Neutral winds in the daytime middle thermosphere are difficult to measure. The High altitude Interferometer WIND Observation instrument made measurements of these winds from a balloon in the summers of 2011 and 2018 during both daytime and nighttime at high latitudes. This paper presents a study comparing HIWIND neutral winds to global ionosphere thermosphere model (GITM) results. The meridional winds from GITM matched the trends and magnitude of the measurements of HIWIND, while the zonal winds showed much more disagreement in general. However, there existed a strong shear in the GITM results. When results from ±5° latitude were considered, they mostly bound the zonal HIWIND measurements. This study showed that: (a) HIWIND was on the edge of the high-latitude convection region where strong shears in the zonal flow occurred. Placement of the ion drifts and the aurora are important in determining the neutral winds in this region. GITM simulations using idealized drivers showed very different results. (b) On three of the 4 days, GITM's dawn region winds didn't match the HIWIND or GOCE wind measurements. These indicate that the placement of the aurora and ion drifts may be incorrect, or GITM's balance between acceleration terms could be off. (c) Viscosity and gradient in pressure accelerations were dominant, but mostly opposite. Ion drag and Coriolis were smaller, but are important, especially when the other two terms cancel each other. Specification of high-latitude drivers (i.e., the electric potential and auroral precipitation) are critically important to modeling the thermospheric winds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":\"130 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033521\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033521\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

白天中层热层的中性风很难测量。高空干涉仪风观测仪器于2011年和2018年夏季在高纬度地区的白天和夜间用气球测量了这些风。本文介绍了HIWIND中性风与全球电离层热层模式(GITM)结果的比较研究。GITM的经向风与HIWIND测量值的趋势和大小相匹配,而纬向风在总体上表现出更大的差异。然而,GITM结果中存在强烈的剪切作用。当考虑±5°纬度的结果时,它们大多与纬向HIWIND测量相结合。研究表明:(a) HIWIND位于高纬对流区边缘,纬向气流中出现强切变。离子漂移的位置和极光对于确定该地区的中性风很重要。使用理想驱动程序的GITM模拟显示了非常不同的结果。(b)在4天中有3天,GITM的黎明区风与HIWIND或GOCE的风测量值不匹配。这些表明,极光和离子漂移的位置可能是不正确的,或者GITM在加速项之间的平衡可能是错误的。(c)压力加速度的粘度和梯度占主导地位,但大多数相反。离子阻力和科里奥利较小,但很重要,特别是当其他两项相互抵消时。高纬度驱动因素(即电势和极光降水)的具体说明对于模拟热层风至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparisons Between the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model and HIWIND Measurements

Comparisons Between the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model and HIWIND Measurements

Neutral winds in the daytime middle thermosphere are difficult to measure. The High altitude Interferometer WIND Observation instrument made measurements of these winds from a balloon in the summers of 2011 and 2018 during both daytime and nighttime at high latitudes. This paper presents a study comparing HIWIND neutral winds to global ionosphere thermosphere model (GITM) results. The meridional winds from GITM matched the trends and magnitude of the measurements of HIWIND, while the zonal winds showed much more disagreement in general. However, there existed a strong shear in the GITM results. When results from ±5° latitude were considered, they mostly bound the zonal HIWIND measurements. This study showed that: (a) HIWIND was on the edge of the high-latitude convection region where strong shears in the zonal flow occurred. Placement of the ion drifts and the aurora are important in determining the neutral winds in this region. GITM simulations using idealized drivers showed very different results. (b) On three of the 4 days, GITM's dawn region winds didn't match the HIWIND or GOCE wind measurements. These indicate that the placement of the aurora and ion drifts may be incorrect, or GITM's balance between acceleration terms could be off. (c) Viscosity and gradient in pressure accelerations were dominant, but mostly opposite. Ion drag and Coriolis were smaller, but are important, especially when the other two terms cancel each other. Specification of high-latitude drivers (i.e., the electric potential and auroral precipitation) are critically important to modeling the thermospheric winds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信