人类婴儿会对处于困境中的他人表现出同情吗?

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Béatrice Le Tellier, Olivier Vivier, Henry Markovits, Joyce F. Benenson
{"title":"人类婴儿会对处于困境中的他人表现出同情吗?","authors":"Béatrice Le Tellier,&nbsp;Olivier Vivier,&nbsp;Henry Markovits,&nbsp;Joyce F. Benenson","doi":"10.1111/desc.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Results from a number of studies of human empathy are interpreted as demonstrating that young infants exhibit concern towards others who are suffering. Studies of empathy in young infants, however, often confound interest in intensity and ecologically valid stimuli with concern about others’ suffering. Using a perceptually controlled design with ecologically valid stimuli, we investigated whether very young human infants preferentially look at a peer in distress. We showed 78 3–6-month-old infants videos of four babies who were crying and cooing along with synthetically generated control videos of the same babies that preserved their perceptual features. Results showed that infants overwhelmingly looked longer at babies who were crying versus cooing, with the same relative difference observed for crying versus cooing controls, although infants found real babies more interesting than controls. Results suggest that infants’ attention to differences in emotional valence related to empathy cannot be clearly interpreted without controlling for associated perceptual differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Summary</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Three- to six-month-old infants look more at crying than cooing babies, even when they are perceptually scrambled controls.</li>\n \n <li>Real babies are looked at more than their perceptually scrambled controls.</li>\n \n <li>No clear evidence exists for young infants’ empathy as measured through looking times.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Young Human Infants Show Empathy for Others in Distress?\",\"authors\":\"Béatrice Le Tellier,&nbsp;Olivier Vivier,&nbsp;Henry Markovits,&nbsp;Joyce F. Benenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/desc.70047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Results from a number of studies of human empathy are interpreted as demonstrating that young infants exhibit concern towards others who are suffering. Studies of empathy in young infants, however, often confound interest in intensity and ecologically valid stimuli with concern about others’ suffering. Using a perceptually controlled design with ecologically valid stimuli, we investigated whether very young human infants preferentially look at a peer in distress. We showed 78 3–6-month-old infants videos of four babies who were crying and cooing along with synthetically generated control videos of the same babies that preserved their perceptual features. Results showed that infants overwhelmingly looked longer at babies who were crying versus cooing, with the same relative difference observed for crying versus cooing controls, although infants found real babies more interesting than controls. Results suggest that infants’ attention to differences in emotional valence related to empathy cannot be clearly interpreted without controlling for associated perceptual differences.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Summary</h3>\\n \\n <div>\\n <ul>\\n \\n <li>Three- to six-month-old infants look more at crying than cooing babies, even when they are perceptually scrambled controls.</li>\\n \\n <li>Real babies are looked at more than their perceptually scrambled controls.</li>\\n \\n <li>No clear evidence exists for young infants’ empathy as measured through looking times.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental Science\",\"volume\":\"28 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70047\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.70047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多关于人类同理心的研究结果被解释为,年幼的婴儿对受苦的人表现出关心。然而,对幼儿共情的研究经常将对强度和生态有效刺激的兴趣与对他人痛苦的关注混淆起来。使用感知控制设计与生态有效的刺激,我们调查了是否非常年幼的人类婴儿优先看同伴的痛苦。我们给78个3 - 6个月大的婴儿看了四个婴儿哭闹和咕咕的视频,同时合成了这些婴儿的控制视频,保留了他们的感知特征。结果显示,绝大多数婴儿会更长时间地观察哭泣的婴儿,而不是咕咕叫的婴儿,尽管婴儿发现真正的婴儿比对照组更有趣,但在哭泣和咕咕叫的对照组中观察到的相对差异也是一样的。结果表明,在不控制相关知觉差异的情况下,婴儿对共情相关情绪效价差异的注意不能被清楚地解释。3到6个月大的婴儿比会咕咕叫的婴儿更关注哭泣,即使他们是感知上的混乱控制。真正的婴儿比他们感知上的混乱控制更受关注。没有明确的证据表明婴儿的同理心是通过观察时间来衡量的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Young Human Infants Show Empathy for Others in Distress?

Results from a number of studies of human empathy are interpreted as demonstrating that young infants exhibit concern towards others who are suffering. Studies of empathy in young infants, however, often confound interest in intensity and ecologically valid stimuli with concern about others’ suffering. Using a perceptually controlled design with ecologically valid stimuli, we investigated whether very young human infants preferentially look at a peer in distress. We showed 78 3–6-month-old infants videos of four babies who were crying and cooing along with synthetically generated control videos of the same babies that preserved their perceptual features. Results showed that infants overwhelmingly looked longer at babies who were crying versus cooing, with the same relative difference observed for crying versus cooing controls, although infants found real babies more interesting than controls. Results suggest that infants’ attention to differences in emotional valence related to empathy cannot be clearly interpreted without controlling for associated perceptual differences.

Summary

  • Three- to six-month-old infants look more at crying than cooing babies, even when they are perceptually scrambled controls.
  • Real babies are looked at more than their perceptually scrambled controls.
  • No clear evidence exists for young infants’ empathy as measured through looking times.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信